Hsm 542 Week 8 Final Exam

Ethics is a strongly culturally linked area of philosophy interrelated with what is considered acceptable human conduct. There are two branches of ethics; medical ethics and bioethics. The moral conduct and principles which govern practices of medical and health professionals falls under medical ethics, whereas in biomedicine and the health sciences theorised developments in the study of social and moral issues is considered bioethics(1). There are two philosophical principles within the conduction of health care research these are deontology and utilitarianism. Deontology is an approach to ethics that focuses on the rightness or wrongness of actions themselves, as opposed to the rightness or wrongness of the consequences of those actions (2). Utilitarianism states that the most benefit

Moreover, an emphasis is imposed on the rights of a single patient to commit an act or decision even though it is in contrast with the views of the others. In regards to the ethical dilemma, a nurse could not justify the morality of the two possible choices based on their results and consequences. The Deontological approach would encourage the health care staff as well as the patient to ask themselves the most righteous choice for their situation. With this in mind, a combination of ethical theories can also be employed to give light to the dilemma. In view of this, another ethical approach could be applied to solve the issue, and this is the Right-based approach. This theory also aim to promote the rights of every person, and that, they are indispensable just to make ends meet. However, not all ethical theories can be incorporated in every dilemma in a health care setting because their foundations would contradict one another. In order to provide an effective and efficient solution, nurses should be knowledgeable of the principles enveloping each of the ethical theories and should be wise to apply them in appropriate issues and

Select an ethical dilemma related to health policy from the categories of moral values, professional regulation, health of individuals in society, or distributive justice. What are the controversies surrounding this issue? What are the opposing ethical principles? How has past or current health policy addressed this dilemma? Support your reasoning with reference citations.

Sylvia Law, a published author in the University of Maryland Law Review, in her essay, “Physician-Assisted Death: An Essay on Constitutional Rights and Remedies,” addresses the issues in constitutional law surrounding the controversy of a person’s right to die. In the three parts to her essay, Law contends and considers whether “statutes that criminalize medically assisted suicides violate the liberty and privacy rights of terminally ill” and whether “assisted suicide should be considered a constitutionally protected right and also the ways in which these issues come before the courts”. Her purpose is to analyze and inform on the laws and challenges relating to this issue in order to make readers aware of the problems that are created by the

Right to die issues are important to American society because as the as population grows older more people are going to encounter the issue that cannot choose to end their life prematurely, unless the live in state that allows physician assisted suicide which all most all do not, but must instead suffer until they finally perish. The first landmark case involving the right to die was In Re Quinlan 70 N.J. 10 (1976), In Re means in the matter of. The importance of this case was to establish whether medical personnel that remove a life supporting ventilator, with the expectation that the patient would not be able to continue breathing on their own, would result in said medical personnel being charge with the crime of homicide. Karen Quinlan was a 21 year old women that had become

The main focus of this paper is how the rights and decisions of terminally ill patients may impact the rest of us. The audience of this research paper is made up of physicians and nurses practicing physician assisted suicide, patients with terminal illnesses, families of patients with terminal illness, and judges and jurors dealing with cases in this field. The purpose of this paper is to help others understand the importance of this topic and become informed on how the denial of assisted suicide can affect patients.

Conversely, there are many barriers in making decisions about death among family members, including culture, education, knowledge of the health care system, and the delegating of all decisions entirely to the family (Haley). A family member of a patient stated that all she wanted was “another sane adult’ who could “talk in terms…that removed the taboo from the processes by giving a real clear picture of possible approaches without advocating [PAS]” (Spigel). It is obvious that no relative would want to let a member of the family pass away without doing what ever is possible, so that the patient has every fighting chance to pull through. So the burden ways equally on the family, if not, more, because when it comes to assisted suicide grieving will last longer than pain every time. Once the procedure has taken place, the family members are the ones who have to take care of the patient after they are diseased.

In the Healthcare field there are ethical issues that arise daily. From balancing care quality to determining end of life issues, healthcare professionals are constantly trying to find a place of balance. Healthcare professionals do not have an easy job, they face challenging decisions every single day determining what is best for the patient and the organization. When an ethical dilemma arises within a healthcare organization, ethical decision making can help make an onerous decision easier.

When caring for a terminally ill patient, each member of the health care team contributes in providing end-of-life (EOL) care. In order to know our role in the care, it is important to understand the legal rights of the patient. In 1991, the United States legislated the Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) in regards to EOL decision-making. According to our textbook, the PDSA “relies on state laws related to EOL care and was designed to encourage communication about end of life issues” (Grace, 2013, p. 123). This act helps ensure that patients receive adequate information regarding advanced directives and offers protection of their right to self-determination in health care decisions (K, 1992).

Medical ethics and legal issues have been a key topic in medical field for many years now. It is important for medical professionals to understand the importance of the way we care for patients, it is therefore important to be knowledgeable and aware of the medical ethics and legal issues that govern good patient care. Health care professionals must make decisions based on ethical and legal issues to performance their regular duties. However, Medical ethics is not only about avoiding harm to patients. It is rather a norms, values and principles (Ethical theories 2015). Therefore norms, values and principles are intended to govern medical ethical conduct. Ethics is defined as “a standard of behaviour and a concept of right and wrong beyond what the legal consideration is in any given situation”. In another words medical ethics is a discipline that used to handle moral problems coming out the care of patients. Law is another important discipline that often comes together with medical ethics. Law defined as a “rule of conduct or action prescribed or formally recognized as binding or enforced by a controlling authority”. Government imply law to keep the society running smoothly and to control behaviour that could threaten public safety. Medical professionals have to often prioritise these terms before making any clinical decision. The following findings will constructively emphasise on medical ethics, its

Describe the ethical challenges we face in the future in health services as it relates to health care reform in the United States. We face many ethical issues which include: issues in developing resources, in economic support, in organization of services, in management of health services, in delivery of care, and in assuring quality of care. In developing resources, health personnel, facilities, drugs, equipment, and knowledge are all critical to public health. The types and amount of these are will be crucial to meeting the ethical requirements for public health. Personal autonomy and respect

Health care professionals must learn how to balance the principles of Nonmaleficence, Beneficence, Autonomy, and Justice especially in a busy hospital as in the case of Armando Dimas. Health care ethics is a type of normative, applied ethics. It is based on the assumption that, despite all of our differences, we can determine what is right and wrong within the constraints of a human condition prone to error. The goal of health care ethics is to provide health care professionals, students who seek health care careers, and members of the general public with moral guidelines that any rational

The ethical challenges that arise for the standards of care in a healthcare setting include concerns about the choices and care experiences of residents, involvement of families, and other staff members with the healthcare facility laws and policies. Healthcare workforce must be capable of understanding ethical behavior and potential enough to identify the ethical problems in order to contend with the potential risks involved while providing care

Terminally ill patients should have the right to have a doctor help assist them with their suicide. The patients who suffer have the right to determine their fates, when to end the suffering, and how to reduce hospital bills for their families. When determining one’s fate, the patients get to choose when they want to pass. Terminally ill patients suffer tremendously during their time of need. The patient’s look to help their families, instead of putting a burden on them. They try to keep them from having to pay their bills after they have passed. Allowing the patients to choose assisted suicide lets them put an end to their pain and suffering.

This case talks about the right a the spouse in end of life decision making.