Introduction to mathematical programming
4th Edition
ISBN: 9780534359645
Author: Jeffrey B. Goldberg
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Expert Solution & Answer
Chapter 3, Problem 28RP
Explanation of Solution
Optimal solution of LP:
To find the optimal solution, follow the steps given below,
Step 1:
Consider each inequality constraint as equality and find 2 pair of points for each of the equations.
Let,
Putting
Putting
Let,
Putting
Putting
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
b) Consider the following linear programming problem:
Min z = x1 + x2
s.t. 3x1 – 2x2 < 5
X1 + x2 < 3
3x1 + 3x2 2 9
X1, X2 2 0
Using the graphical approach, determine the possible optimal solution(s) and comment
on the special case involved, if any.
Variable Cells
Final
Reduced
Objective
Allowable
Allowable
Cell
Name
Value
Cost
Coefficient
Increase
Decrease
Туре А
4
-3.5
1E+30
Туре B
y
Туре С
3.
6.
2
Constraints
Final
Shadow
Constraint
Allowable
Allowable
Cell
Name
Value
Price
R.H. Side
Increase
Decrease
Hours
1.
15
1
15
12
8.
Plastic
20
30
1E+30
30
Cotton
70
70
40
55
Calculate the optimal value of the objective function if the coefficient of "x" changes to 4 and the coefficient of "y" changes to 3.5.
Hint: Since it is proposing a simultaneous change (more than one change at a time), we have to check the 100% rule.
**Enter the number only**
**Do not use any words or symbols**
Answer:
5
M 5
Solve the following LP optimization problem using the simplex method: maximize 40x + 30 subject to x + y <= 12, 2x + y <= 16 x >= 1 , y >= 0
Chapter 3 Solutions
Introduction to mathematical programming
Ch. 3.1 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.1 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.1 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.1 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.1 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.2 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.2 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.2 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.2 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.2 - Prob. 5P
Ch. 3.2 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 8PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 9PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 10PCh. 3.4 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.4 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.4 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.4 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.6 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.6 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.6 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.6 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.6 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.7 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 8PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 9PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 10PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 11PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 12PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 13PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 14PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 8PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 9PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 10PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 11PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 12PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 13PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 14PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 8PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 9PCh. 3.11 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.11 - Show that Fincos objective function may also be...Ch. 3.11 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.11 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.11 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.11 - Prob. 8PCh. 3.11 - Prob. 9PCh. 3.12 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.12 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.12 - Prob. 4PCh. 3 - Prob. 1RPCh. 3 - Prob. 2RPCh. 3 - Prob. 3RPCh. 3 - Prob. 4RPCh. 3 - Prob. 5RPCh. 3 - Prob. 6RPCh. 3 - Prob. 7RPCh. 3 - Prob. 8RPCh. 3 - Prob. 9RPCh. 3 - Prob. 10RPCh. 3 - Prob. 11RPCh. 3 - Prob. 12RPCh. 3 - Prob. 13RPCh. 3 - Prob. 14RPCh. 3 - Prob. 15RPCh. 3 - Prob. 16RPCh. 3 - Prob. 17RPCh. 3 - Prob. 18RPCh. 3 - Prob. 19RPCh. 3 - Prob. 20RPCh. 3 - Prob. 21RPCh. 3 - Prob. 22RPCh. 3 - Prob. 23RPCh. 3 - Prob. 24RPCh. 3 - Prob. 25RPCh. 3 - Prob. 26RPCh. 3 - Prob. 27RPCh. 3 - Prob. 28RPCh. 3 - Prob. 29RPCh. 3 - Prob. 30RPCh. 3 - Prob. 31RPCh. 3 - Prob. 32RPCh. 3 - Prob. 33RPCh. 3 - Prob. 34RPCh. 3 - Prob. 35RPCh. 3 - Prob. 36RPCh. 3 - Prob. 37RPCh. 3 - Prob. 38RPCh. 3 - Prob. 39RPCh. 3 - Prob. 40RPCh. 3 - Prob. 41RPCh. 3 - Prob. 42RPCh. 3 - Prob. 43RPCh. 3 - Prob. 44RPCh. 3 - Prob. 45RPCh. 3 - Prob. 46RPCh. 3 - Prob. 47RPCh. 3 - Prob. 48RPCh. 3 - Prob. 49RPCh. 3 - Prob. 50RPCh. 3 - Prob. 51RPCh. 3 - Prob. 52RPCh. 3 - Prob. 53RPCh. 3 - Prob. 54RPCh. 3 - Prob. 56RPCh. 3 - Prob. 57RPCh. 3 - Prob. 58RPCh. 3 - Prob. 59RPCh. 3 - Prob. 60RPCh. 3 - Prob. 61RPCh. 3 - Prob. 62RPCh. 3 - Prob. 63RP
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- 9. Recall the TJ Inc.'s problem (Chapter 2, Problem 28). Letting W = jars of Western Foods Salsa M = jars of Mexico City Salsa leads to the formulation: Max 1W + 1.25M s.t. 5W + 7M 0arrow_forwardIt is unclear why each LP has an optimal fundamental feasible solution.arrow_forwardWhich of the following provide a solution for the following LP problem? MAX: 3X1 +4X2 Subject to: X1 ≤ 12 X2 ≤ 10 4X1 _ 6X2 ≤ 72 X1, X2 ≥ 0 X1 = 12, X2 = 3 X1= 18, X2=0 PROFIT = 54 PROFIT= 56arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Operations Research : Applications and AlgorithmsComputer ScienceISBN:9780534380588Author:Wayne L. WinstonPublisher:Brooks Cole
Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms
Computer Science
ISBN:9780534380588
Author:Wayne L. Winston
Publisher:Brooks Cole