Economics For Today
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337613040
Author: Tucker
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 14, Problem 2SQP
To determine
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
What are pollution havens? How are they
created or why do they exist? Why do
economists think they may change over time
and develop policies to reduce pollution?
What happens in the market for a good that pollutes the air when it is manufactured if government decides to tax consumers when the product is purchased? Will this reduce the amount of air pollution?
It’s common to think that reducing pollution is necessarily costly because to reduce pollution we need to tax firms who will then produce less. But can you think of one example in which pollution might not only be unpleasant but might actually reduce production?
Chapter 14 Solutions
Economics For Today
Ch. 14.2 - Prob. 1.1GECh. 14.2 - Prob. 1.2GECh. 14.2 - Prob. 1.3GECh. 14.2 - Prob. 2.1GECh. 14.2 - Prob. 2.2GECh. 14.2 - Prob. 2.3GECh. 14.2 - Prob. 2.4GECh. 14 - Prob. 1SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 2SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 3SQP
Ch. 14 - Prob. 4SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 5SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 6SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 7SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 8SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 9SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 10SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 11SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 12SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 13SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 14SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 15SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 16SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 1SQCh. 14 - Prob. 2SQCh. 14 - From an economic viewpoint, the optimal amount of...Ch. 14 - Prob. 4SQCh. 14 - Prob. 5SQCh. 14 - Prob. 6SQCh. 14 - Prob. 7SQCh. 14 - Prob. 8SQCh. 14 - Prob. 9SQCh. 14 - Prob. 10SQCh. 14 - Prob. 11SQCh. 14 - Prob. 12SQCh. 14 - Prob. 13SQCh. 14 - Prob. 14SQCh. 14 - Prob. 15SQCh. 14 - Prob. 16SQCh. 14 - Prob. 17SQCh. 14 - Prob. 18SQCh. 14 - Prob. 19SQCh. 14 - Prob. 20SQ
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- What are the costs of pollution according to the Lancet Commission on pollution and health? Why are those numbers likely to be an underestimate? Explain.arrow_forwardWhat happens in the market for a good that pollutes the air when it is manufactured if government decides to tax its production? Will this reduce the amount of air pollution?arrow_forwardHow do economists determine the optimal amount of pollution control?arrow_forward
- Which of the following best explains why economists believe that there is an optimal amount of pollution reduction? The marginal cost of reducing pollution is decreasing, while the marginal benefit of reducing pollution is increasing. Economists only think about profits The marginal cost of reducing pollution is increasing, while the marginal benefit of reducing pollution is decreasing. Economists focus on the benefits of reducing pollution and ignore the cost.arrow_forwardIn what ways is pollution still a problem?arrow_forwardWhen studying pollution and the environment, economists A) emphasize costs and benefits. B) attempt to reduce pollution at all costs. C) think pollution is good if it occurs when production takes place. D) have no role to play. E) concentrate on the physical aspects of the environment.arrow_forward
- Imagine the government of California has proposed a new tax on vehicles based on the amount of emissions they produce in a year. In 2019, there will be 20 tons of emissions produced. The governor’s office has run the calculations and found that the socially optimal level is 14 tons and the marginal damage from each unit of pollution is $150. Imagine there are two types of drivers in California: commuters and non-commuters. Imagine that the marginal cost of reducing pollution for commuters is MCA_C=150Q and the marginal cost of reducing pollution for non-commuters is MCA_N=30Q. Each type initially created ten tons of pollution each. Their total cost of reductions is equal to TCA_C=75Q^2 and TCA_N=15Q^2. How much would each type choose to reduce under the tax? Imagine the governor instead suggested forcing all drivers to reduce their emissions by 30% from their 2019 levels. How would the costs of reduction here compare to the taxation case (please provide actual numbers)? Do you…arrow_forwardFirst, is it possible to have zero pollution? Next, even if it is possible, would we want to achieve zero pollution? Lastly, do you think there is too much pollution, and if so why?arrow_forwardIs zero pollution an optimal goal?arrow_forward
- What is the air pollution policy in Hawaii? What is the air pollution policy in the United states?arrow_forwardWhich of the following describes the effect of an optimal tax on pollution?Select one:a. a benevolent social planner is able to maximize productionb. producers choose not to produce any pollutionc. the value to consumers at market equilibrium exceeds the cost of production (including tax)d. producers internalize the cost of the pollutionarrow_forwardExplain: “Without a market for pollution rights, dumping pollutants into the air or water is costless; in the presence of the right to buy and sell pollution rights, dumping pollutants creates an opportunity cost for the polluter.” What is the significance of this opportunity cost to the search for better technology to reduce pollution?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & PolicyEconomicsISBN:9781337794992Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. SolowPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & Policy
Economics
ISBN:9781337794992
Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow
Publisher:Cengage Learning