Person BS is a leader who blends innovation with the motive of profit. He implemented an unstructured time in which employees can utilize 10% of their work time to any project of their own wish. He says that employees who love the work will work hard and get more done. Another strategy of Person BS was to focus on the design of the financial software. He also, modified the workspace to ensure more collaboration across different departments. Company IT has grown tremendously under the leadership of Person BS. To explain: The leadership style of Person BS.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 9.24C

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person BS is a leader who blends innovation with the motive of profit. He implemented an unstructured time in which employees can utilize 10% of their work time to any project of their own wish. He says that employees who love the work will work hard and get more done.

Another strategy of Person BS was to focus on the design of the financial software. He also, modified the workspace to ensure more collaboration across different departments. Company IT has grown tremendously under the leadership of Person BS.

To explain: The leadership style of Person BS.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

You have just returned from a conference on leadership held in the lovely Southside of Chicago. You heard from a diverse range of interesting speakers such as Aaron ‘T-Bone’ Walker and Barrelhouse Chuck. However, it was Albert Collins talk on Authentic Leadership which you found the most interesting. Albert was quite critical of Authentic Leadership and since your boss, Eddy ‘The Chief’ Clearwater, wants to know more, he has asked you to prepare a summary for him. Outline the core criticisms of Authentic Leadership in practice AND as a theoretical framework in a memo to your boss. (400 words)

Lou Gerstner, former CEO of IBM, has strong views on why successful companies often fail. He goes on to comment that “enduring companies we see are not really companies that have lasted for 100 years. They’ve changes 25 times or 4 times over the 100 years.” His prescription for this for strong leaders is to inoculate their firms against complacency and continuously push their firms forward. He adds that leadership that really counts is the leadership that keeps a company changing in an incremental, continuous fashion. You are requested to think of an organization leader that you know (or read about). Critically discuss whether or not this leader was effective and was able to bring about a significant organization change. Explain reasons behind this leader success (or failure). I don't want the essay to be solved i just want further explanation on what to write and if you can answer ut i will be very pleased

There are five primary types of leadership: Transformational, Authoritarian, Delegative, Transactional, and Participative. In your initial post: Explain your leadership style. Which of the five primary types of leadership most closely aligns with your style? Why did you pick that style? Why is it the best leadership style for the sector of the economy you choose to work in? (This can either be with your current job or the job you plan to work in after you graduate.) Should leaders change their leadership style to adapt to different circumstances? Why or why not?