Modern Physics
3rd Edition
ISBN: 9781111794378
Author: Raymond A. Serway, Clement J. Moses, Curt A. Moyer
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 9Q
To determine
Whether most major experimental discoveries are made by careful planning or by accident.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
Gamma-ray detectors like the one described in the preceding problem often use calorimetry to determine gamma-ray energies. Suppose a beam of 100-MeV gamma rays strikes a target with a mass of 2.5 kg and specifi c heat 430 J/(kg # K). How many gamma rays are needed to raise the target’s temperature by 10 mK?
J 5
Question 2 (1) Assume that the average energy of β-rays (electrons) emitted from the S-ray source is 0.8 MeV, and the average ionization energy of gas molecules (atoms) in the GM counter tube is about 30 eV. Find the number of gas molecules ionized when one electron enters the GM tube (1MeV = 10°eV). (2) Assuming that the electrons and cations thus generated are attracted to the electrode as they are, what is the total amount of negative charge generated by ionization in C (coulombs)? (3) If this ionization takes 10-4s, what is the current flowing through the anode?
(a) After J. J. Thompson experimentally discovered the existence of electrons in 1897, he
went on to propose the plum pudding model of matter. What was the plum pudding model?
What did Ernest Rutherford conclude about the structure of matter based on his experimental
results from bombarding gold foil with alpha particles? (b) What was the proposed atomic
model of matter put forward by Rutherford? Theoretically what was the problem with his
proposed model of the atom? (c) What was the modification made by Niels Bohr to
Rutherford's model, i.e., what were the assumptions that Bohr made for his version of the
atomic model of matter? (d) What observational phenomena was Bohr's proposed model able
to explain? How did his model explain these phenomena? (e) Draw an energy level diagram
with one representative transition to support your answer to part (d).
Chapter 5 Solutions
Modern Physics
Ch. 5.1 - A 0.20-kg ball is thrown upward. How much work is...Ch. 5.5 - Prob. 5ECh. 5 - Prob. 1QCh. 5 - Prob. 2QCh. 5 - Prob. 3QCh. 5 - Prob. 4QCh. 5 - Prob. 5QCh. 5 - Prob. 7QCh. 5 - Prob. 8QCh. 5 - Prob. 9Q
Ch. 5 - Prob. 10QCh. 5 - Prob. 11QCh. 5 - Prob. 1PCh. 5 - Prob. 2PCh. 5 - Prob. 3PCh. 5 - Prob. 4PCh. 5 - Prob. 5PCh. 5 - Prob. 6PCh. 5 - Prob. 7PCh. 5 - Prob. 8PCh. 5 - Prob. 9PCh. 5 - Prob. 10PCh. 5 - Prob. 11PCh. 5 - Prob. 12PCh. 5 - Prob. 13PCh. 5 - Prob. 14PCh. 5 - Show that the group velocity for a nonrelativistic...Ch. 5 - Prob. 16PCh. 5 - Prob. 17PCh. 5 - Prob. 18PCh. 5 - Prob. 19PCh. 5 - Prob. 20PCh. 5 - Prob. 21PCh. 5 - Prob. 22PCh. 5 - Prob. 23PCh. 5 - Prob. 24PCh. 5 - Prob. 25PCh. 5 - Prob. 26PCh. 5 - Prob. 27PCh. 5 - Prob. 28PCh. 5 - Prob. 29PCh. 5 - Prob. 30PCh. 5 - Prob. 31PCh. 5 - Prob. 32PCh. 5 - Prob. 33PCh. 5 - Prob. 34PCh. 5 - Prob. 35PCh. 5 - Prob. 36PCh. 5 - Prob. 37P
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, physics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- (2) Stirling's formula is given by the following, depending on the accuracy you need:* In N! N In N - N or, +즐 In N! ≈ N ln N − N + √ln(2´N) Evaluate the accuracy of these formulas for N = 5, 10, 20, 60. Is it reasonable to expect the same accuracy for both formulas at very large N? *(Aside: Actual Stirling's formula is for gamma function П(z) ≈ FO where z is a complex number, and П(n + 1) = n! for nЄ N.)arrow_forwardUsing Hg gas in the Franck-Hertz experiment, approximately what range of voltages would you expect for the fi rst peak? Explain.arrow_forwardIn the planetary model of the atom where electrons orbit a centralized nucleus, what is the approximate ratio of the radius of the nucleus to that of the electron orbits?arrow_forward
- Spectroscopy based on emission techniques is usually considered more sensitive than techniques based on normal absorption spectroscopy methods. (a) Why is that so if the same number of emitting or absorbing species is involved in the comparison? (b) In many applications, however, Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy can be more sensitive than Atomic Emission Spectroscopy. When can that apply? [Hint: Consider what is required for emission measurements and the number of originating energy levels versus what is required for absorption measurements.arrow_forward1 For the Rutherford (Geiger and Marsden) experiment with 5.5 MeV alpha particles on a 1 um gold foil, and for the six angles (decades) between 10-5 and 10° rad, calculate the Rutherford differential cross section (DCS), dor/d2, (a) without and (b) with screening. Represent both results graphically and draw conclusions. Answer: The nonscreened DCS values vary between 1.7137x10-3 and 2.0273×10 23 cm? rad-' in the interval [10-5-1 rad]. The screening angle is 3.7 x 10-3 rad, and the corresponding screened DCS values vary between 9.3620 x 10-14 and 2.0273 x 10-23 cm² rad-'. The screening Xa cuts off the otherwise increasing DCS with decreasing angle, which remains practically constant below Xarrow_forward(a) How many L values are associated with n= 3? (b) How many mL values are associated with L=1 ?arrow_forward
- Is this the correct way to solve for W(ca)arrow_forwardWhat are some important practical differences that you have observed between spectroscopies of charged-particles and gamma-rays?arrow_forwardIdentify the exponential relationship from the list below: Select one: z = (100+2)e4t z = (100+e4)t+2 2 = (100+2)t+e 4 =(100+e4)t? O a. O b. %| c. O d.arrow_forward
- If the radius of a calcium ion is 0.19 nm, how much energy does it take to singly ionize it? Give your answer in electron-volts (eV) with precision 0.1 eV. Give your answer to 2 significant digits. (with step pls)arrow_forwardWhen adhesive tape is pulled froma dispenser, the detached tape acquires a positive charge and theremaining tape in the dispenser acquires a negative charge. If thetape pulled from the dispenser has 0.14 mC of charge per centimeter, what length of tape must be pulled to transfer 1.8 * 1013electrons to the remaining tape?arrow_forwardIf a student measured the edge length of a cubic metal nine times as follows: 5.16, 5.29, 5.20, 5.08, 5.23, 5.36, 5.11, 5.28 and 5.12 cm. The student also measured the mass of the cube to be 380.5±0.5 g. Answer the following four questions 1.5/6 2. 3. 1. The sample standard deviation for the edge length of the cube is 0.09 cm 0.03 cm 0.05 cm 4. a. c. d. 0.12 cm e. 0.06 cm The best estimate for the edge length of the cube is a. 5.2033+0.0315 cm b. 5.2033+0.0944 cm c. 5.20+0.09 cm d. 5.20+0.06 cm 5.2010.03 cm The volume of the cubic metallic piece is a. 140.910.09 cm3 140.8+0.08 cm3 c. 14113 cm3. d. 140+2 cm3 e. 140+3 cm3 The density of the metal is a. 2.71±0.07 g/cm3 (b) 2.700±0.06 g/cm3 c. 2.700+0.005 g/cm3 d. 2.70±0.06 g/cm3 e. 2.70±0.05 g/cm3 tarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Modern PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781111794378Author:Raymond A. Serway, Clement J. Moses, Curt A. MoyerPublisher:Cengage LearningPhysics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern ...PhysicsISBN:9781337553292Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Physics: A Calculus-Based TextPhysicsISBN:9781133104261Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage Learning
Modern Physics
Physics
ISBN:9781111794378
Author:Raymond A. Serway, Clement J. Moses, Curt A. Moyer
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern ...
Physics
ISBN:9781337553292
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Physics: A Calculus-Based Text
Physics
ISBN:9781133104261
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning