EBK HEALTH ECONOMICS AND POLICY
7th Edition
ISBN: 9781337668279
Author: Henderson
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 10QAP
a)
To determine
The efficiency of the implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) for the survival as well as the life expectancy of the heart patients.
b)
To determine
Improvement of life expectancy during the trial and the best estimate of improved life expectancy after the trial.
c)
To determine
Illustrate the mortality function through a graph for the ICD as well as for the drug-therapy group.
d)
To determine
The difference of the life expectancy between the two groups.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Assume that 5% of the people who receive
Treatment A die. The sixty percent who fully
recover live another 10 years. The treatment is
only partially successful for 35% of the patients,
who live another 4 years. What is the expected
value of Treatment A, expressed as additional
years of life?
If the expected age of death for a male aged 20 is 75, then a 20-year-old man who dies it's considered to have lost how many years of life?
Under intervention A, the status quo, 15% of 3-year-old children in the country of Granada die from Dengue and under intervention B, a new intervention only 10% of children in Granada die from Dengue. The life expectancy at three years in Dengue is 55 years. The cost of intervention A is $100 and the cost of intervention B is $185. What is the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) comparing intervention B to intervention A expressed as
a. cost per life-years
b. cost per life-years saved
Chapter 4 Solutions
EBK HEALTH ECONOMICS AND POLICY
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The Customs Inspection agency at international airports has developed a traveler profiling system (TPS) to detect passengers who are trying to bring more liquor into the country than is allowed by present regulations. Long-term studies indicate that 20% of the passengers are carrying more liquor than is allowed. Tests on the new TPS scheme has shown that of those carrying illegal amounts of liquor, 80% will be identified and subject to complete luggage search. In addition 20% of those not carrying illegal amounts of liquor will also be identified by TPS and subject to a complete luggage search.If a passenger is identified by TPS, what is the probability that the passenger is carrying an illegal amount of liquor? Comment on the value of this system.arrow_forwardPlease provide valuable answer with proper explanation, don't use any AI tool.arrow_forwardA poll commissioned by a politician estimates that t days after he makes a statement denegrating women, the percentage of his constituency (those who support him at the time he made the statement) that still supports him is given by S(t) = 75(t2 − 3t + 25)/t2+3t+25The election is 10 days after he made the statement. Was the approval rate positive or negative on the date of the election?arrow_forward
- A health economist is conducting the analysis and making a choice between the following two choices: Choice A: there is a certain outcome that the patient will stay in chronic health state X for the rest of his life T Choice B: the treatment has two possible outcomes, either the patient is returned to full Health (1) of the rest of his life T with probability p; the patient dies (0) immediately with the remainig probability What is the utilty value of the health state X? X=P X=PT X=(1-P)/P X=PT/(1-P)arrow_forwardIf a person has a medical condition that has a quality of life index of 0.75, and the condition persisted for two years, then the individual would experience: a. 0.25 QALYs b. 1.50 c 0.50 d 0.75arrow_forwardAccording to Barr, the SES into which you were born and spent your childhood has more predictive power for health as an adult than does your SES category as an adult. True Falsearrow_forward
- Given the worldwide average adolescent fertility rate is 45/1000 for women aged 15 to 19. Which of the following countries most likely had an Afr greater than 45? Israel South korea Japan Nigeriaarrow_forwardCompare and contrast two quantitative tools for decision-making in conditions of certaintyarrow_forwardJUST ANSWER SUBPART 2 There are two individuals, Individual A and Individual B. Individual A has an income (Y) of 500 million Rupiah per year. If Individual A is sick, he will lose 25% of his income. Meanwhile, Individual B has an income (Y) of 100 million Rupiah per year, and if Individual B is sick, he will lose 75% of his income. The probability of Individual A and Individual B being sick is the same, which is 10%. If the satisfaction level of Individual A and Individual B is determined by their income level, based on the following function U(Y)=ln Y, would Individual A and Individual B prefer not to have health insurance? Explain Faced with fair actuarially insurance, how much premium is offered to Individual A? Is the premium rate offered the same for Individual B? Explain with the support of graphic illustrations. The government decides to provide compulsory health insurance with a premium rate for Individual A and Individual B, which is 2% of the income of each individual. In…arrow_forward
- In year 2019, 44232 new cases of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) were reported in a country. The estimated mid-year population of the country in 2019 was approximately 290809777. The incidence rate of AIDS in 2019 was 15.2099 new cases of AIDS per 100000 population 15.9099 new cases of AIDS per 100000 population 14.2099 new cases of AIDS per 100000 population 14.5099 new cases of AIDS per 100000 population 16.2099 new cases of AIDS per 10000O populationarrow_forwardSuppose a US medical board is using marginal analysis to determine the optimal screening frequency for a specific disease. Below is the approximate number of early cases that screening at various frequencies will detect. The frequency of screening is how often the entire population (of 5,000 people) will be screened over a 10-year period. For example, a Frequency of 5 means the entire population will be will be screened 5 times over a 10-year period. Suppose further that each early detection case is considered to have a benefit of $50,000 and the cost of screening the population is $9,000,000. Frequency of screening the population (number of times over 10 year period) 10 1 12 3 14 Total Number of Early Detection Cases 10 400 700 900 1000 1000 I 5 Using the marginal benefit/marginal cost rule, what is the optimal frequency for screening (over this ten-year period)? 2 times 5 times 3 times 4 timesarrow_forwardAn individual has the utility function U(I) = I^(1/2), where I is their net income. (Note that I to the exponent/power of 1/2 is the same as the square root of I.) The individual starts with $1600 in income. The individual has a 20% probability of being very sick, 30% probability of being slightly sick, and 50% probability of being healthy. If the individual is sick, they lose net income because they need to pay healthcare costs. The healthcare costs are $1600 if they are very sick, $700 if they are slightly sick, and $0 if they are healthy. Please use this information for the following parts of this question unless otherwise specified. What is the individual's expected utility? Suppose a health insurance company offers the individual a full insurance contract. What is the actuarially fair, full insurance premium for this individual? What is the individual's expected utility if they purchase a full insurance contract at the actuarially fair, full insurance premium?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
