Q. 14.21 Two firms are competing in an oligopolistic industry. Firm 1, the larger of the two firms, is contemplating its capacity strategy, which could be either "aggressive" or "passive." The aggressive strategy involves a large increase in capacity aimed at increasing the firm's market share, while the passive strategy involves no change in the firm's capacity. Firm 2, the smaller competitor, is also pondering its capacity expansion strategy; it will also choose between an aggressive strategy and a passive strategy. The following table shows the profits associated with each pair of choices: Firm 2 Aggressive Passive 25, 9 33, 10 Aggressive Passive Firm 1 30, 13 36, 12 a) If both firms decide their strategies simultaneously, what is the Nash equilibrium? b) If Firm 1 could move first and credibly commit to its capacity expansion strategy, what is its optimal strategy? What will Firm 2 do?

Q. 14.21 Two firms are competing in an oligopolistic industry. Firm 1, the larger of the two firms, is contemplating its capacity strategy, which could be either "aggressive" or "passive." The aggressive strategy involves a large increase in capacity aimed at increasing the firm's market share, while the passive strategy involves no change in the firm's capacity. Firm 2, the smaller competitor, is also pondering its capacity expansion strategy; it will also choose between an aggressive strategy and a passive strategy. The following table shows the profits associated with each pair of choices: Firm 2 Aggressive Passive 25, 9 33, 10 Aggressive Passive Firm 1 30, 13 36, 12 a) If both firms decide their strategies simultaneously, what is the Nash equilibrium? b) If Firm 1 could move first and credibly commit to its capacity expansion strategy, what is its optimal strategy? What will Firm 2 do?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two oligopolistic firms have to decide on the pricing strategy. Each can either choose either a high or a low price. If they both choose a high price, each will make $12 million, but if they both choose a low price, each will make $ 8 million. If one sets a high price and other a low one, the low-priced firm will make $16 million, but the high-priced firm will make only $4 million. It is illegal for each firm to communicate with each other. a) Which strategy would both of them ultimately opt for? b) What would be the pay-off for this strategy?
Consider a “punishment” variation of the two-firm oligopoly situation shown in Figure 14.1. Suppose that if one firm sets a low price while the other sets a high price, then the firm setting the high price can fine the firm setting the low price. Suppose that whenever a fine is imposed, X dollars is taken from the low-price firm and given to the high-price firm. What is the smallest amount that the fine X can be such that both firms will want to always set the high price?
Table 17-6 Two home-improvement stores (Lopes and HomeMax) in a growing urban area are interested in expanding their market share. Both are interested in expanding the size of their store and parking lot to accommodate potential growth in their customer base. The following game depicts the strategic outcomes that result from the game. Increases in annual profits (in millions of dollars) of the two home-improvement stores are shown in the following figure. Lopes Do notincreasethe size of store and parking lot Increase the sizeof store and parking lot Lopes = 1.0 Lopes = 0.4 Increasethe size of store and parking lot HomeMax = 1.5 HomeMax = 3.4 HomeMax Lopes = 3.2 Lopes = 2.0 Do notincreasethe size of store and parking lot HomeMax = 0.6 HomeMax = 2.5 Refer to Table 17-6. When this game reaches a Nash equilibrium, annual profit will grow by a. $0.6 million for HomeMax and by $3.2 million for Lopes. b. $2.5 million for HomeMax and by $2.0 million for Lopes. c. $3.4 million for HomeMax and…
Tobacco companies have often argued that they advertise to attract more existing smokers and not to persuade more people to smoke. Suppose there were just two cigarette manufacturers, Jones and Smith. Each can either advertise or not advertise. If neither advertises, they each capture 50 percent of the market and each earns $10 million. If they both advertise, they again split the market evenly, but each spends $2million on ads and so each earns just $8million (remember, advertising is not supposed to encourage more people to smoke). If one company advertises but the other does not, then the company that advertises attracts many of its rival's customers. As a result, the company that advertises earns $12 million and the company that does not earns just $6 million. Advertise Don't Advertise Smith: 8 Smith: 6 Advertise Jones: 8 Jones: 12 Jones Smith: 12 Smith: 10 Don't Advertise Jones: 6 Jones: 10 What is each firm's dominant strategy? Both firms' dominant strategy is to advertise. Both…
Suppose, due to a massive global recession, only two local banks survived the recession (SMBank and A&L Bank) with equal market share. SMBank is considering several duopolistic competitive strategies, with respect to their pricing of loans, to increase profits. SM Bank hires you as an intern to evaluate all possible strategies. a) List and describe the nature of all feasible simultaneous move strategies in which SMBank may be engaged, in the context of this example. Be sure to use graphs where applicable.
Consider whether the promises and threats made toward each other by duopolists and oligopolists are always credible (believable). Look at the figure below. Imagine that the two firms will play this game twice in sequence and that each firm publicly proclaims the following policy. Each says that if both it and the other firm choose the high price in the first game, then it will also choose the high price in the second game (as a reward to the other firm for cooperating in the first game). (Note: Profit payoffs are shown in millions of dollars.) RareAir's price strategy High Low $12 $15 High $12 $6 C $6 $8 Low $15 $8 a. As a first step toward thinking about whether this policy is credible, consider the situation facing both firms in the second game. If each firm bases its decision on what to do in the second game entirely on the payouts facing the firms in the second game, which strategy will each firm choose in the second game? |(Click to select) b. Now move backward in time one step.…
Consider whether the promises and threats made toward each other by duopolists and oligopolists are always credible (believable). Look at the figure below. Imagine that the two firms will play this game twice in sequence and that each firm publicly proclaims the following policy. Each says that if both it and the other firm choose the high price in the first game, then it will also choose the high price in the second game (as a reward to the other firm for cooperating in the first game). (Note: Profit payoffs are shown in millions of dollars.) RareAir's price strategy High Low $12 $15 A High $12 $6 $6 D $8 Low $15 $8 a. As a first step toward thinking about whether this policy is credible, consider the situation facing both firms in the second game. If each firm bases its decision on what to do in the second game entirely on the payouts facing the firms in the second game, which strategy will each firm choose in the second game? (Click to select) b. Now move backward in time one step.…
In the market for video game consoles, Microsoft and Sony are essentially a duopoly, with Nintendo at a distant third. Consider a purely hypothetical game in which the executives of the two companies are deciding how much they will spend on advertising. To simplify, assume that they can either spend a lot or spend a little. If both firms spend a lot, Sony's hypothetical profit will be $2 billion and Microsoft's hypothetical profit will be $1 billion. If they both spend a little, Sony's profit will be $9 billion and Microsoft's profit will be $7 billion. If Sony spends a lot and Microsoft spends a little, Sony's profit will be $8 billion and Microsoft's profit will be $2 billion. Finally, if Sony spends a little and Microsoft spends a lot, Sony's profit will be $3 billion and Microsoft's profit will be $6 billion. Create the payoff matrix for this game. Does Sony have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? Does Microsoft have a dominant strategy? If so, what is…
Suppose, due to a massive global recession, only two local banks survived the recession (SMBank and A&L Bank) with equal market share. SMBank is considering several duopolistic competitive strategies, with respect to their pricing of loans, to increase profits. SM Bank hires you as an intern to evaluate all possible strategies. Assuming new banks cannot enter the market for legal reasons, in which oligopolistic strategies will SMBank not be able to engage and why? List and describe the nature of all feasible simultaneous move strategies in which SMBank may be engaged, in the context of this example. Be sure to use graphs where applicable. Assume SMBank is the first…
Suppose that an oligopolistic is charging $21 per unit of output and selling 31 units each day. What is its daily total revenue? Also suppose that previously it had lowered its price from $21 to $19, rivals matched the price cut, and the firmâ€™s sales increased from 31 to 32 units. It also previously raised its price from $21 to $23, rivals ignored the price hike, and the firmâ€™s daily total revenue came in at $482. Which of the following is most logical to conclude? The firmâ€™s demand curve is (a) inelastic over the $21 to $23 price range, (b) elastic over the $19 to $21 price range, (c) a linear(straight) down sloping line, or (d) a curve with a kink in it?
q19 If you advertise and your rival advertises, you each will earn $4 million in profits. If neither of you advertises, you will each earn $10 million in profits. However, if one of you advertises and the other does not, the firm that advertises will earn $1 million and the non-advertising firm will earn $5 million. If you and your rival plan to be in business for 10 years, then the Nash equilibrium is a. for each firm to not advertise in any year. b. for neither firm to advertise in early years but to advertise in later years. c. for each firm to advertise every year. d. for each firm to advertise in early years but not advertise in later years.
Suppose that each of two firms in an oligopolistic industry has MC = 8 and together they face P = 68 - 2Q a) If the two firms compete in this market what are P, Q, q1, and q2? b) If the two firms collude what are P, Q, q1, and