Consider the following infinitely repeated Trench Warfare game. Suppose both Allied Soldiersand German Soldiers have the same discount factor, 8.Allied soldiersGerman soldiersKill MissKill 2,2 6,0Miss 0,6 4,4Find the smallest do such that for V8 > do, there is an SPNE with (K, K) and (M, M)alternating each period under a grim trigger strategy.

A Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium (SPNE) is a concept in game theory that represents a set of…

Consider the following infinitely repeated Trench Warfare game. Suppose both Allied Soldiers and German Soldiers have the same discount factor, 6. German soldiers Kill Miss Kill 2,2 6,0 Miss 0,6 4,4 Allied soldiers Find the smallest do such that for V6> do, there is an SPNE with (K, K) and (M, M) alternating each period under a grim trigger strategy.

Consider the following infinitely repeated Trench Warfare game. Suppose both Allied Soldiers and German Soldiers have the same discount factor, 6. German soldiers Kill Miss Kill 2,2 6,0 Miss 0,6 4,4 Allied soldiers Find the smallest do such that for V6> do, there is an SPNE with (K, K) and (M, M) alternating each period under a grim trigger strategy.

Microeconomics: Principles & Policy

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337794992

Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow

Publisher:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow

Chapter13: Between Competition And Monopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10DQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the following two-player game with three options for each player. (Payouts are listed for the row player first, then the column player.) player Y layery 3,3 A 1,5 4,4 6,2 K 8,1 3,7 5,2 0,6 1,1 Find a mixed Nash equilibrium for this game. Solution suggestion: Use two variables per player. If p and are the probabilities of selecting the first two strategies, then 1-p-q is the probability of selecting the third strategy. You will need to solve a system of equations.
Consider the infinite repeated two-player game where at each stage the play- ers play the non-zero-sum game given by A В A (5, 5) (0,7) В (7, 0) | (2, 2) (a) Consider the following strategies: SA: always play A. SB: always play B. • St: play A on the first stage, thereafter copy what the other player did in the preceding stage. Suppose that the total payoff involves a discount factor 8, and that both players are restricted to the pure strategies SA, SB, and sT. Determine the set of d for which (ST, ST) is a Nash equilibrium. (b) Use the one stage deviation principle to determine whether the pair (ST, ST) is a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium for some range of val- ues of 8.
Refer to the payoff matrix below. Assuming this is a sequential game with no collusion, what is the outcome if Firm A moves first to build a new type of commercial aircraft? Explain why fifi rst-mover strategies in the realworld are only as good as the profifit projections on which they are based. How could a supposed “win” from moving first turn out to be a big loss, whereas the “loss” of being preempted turn out to be a blessing in disguise?
Consider the following extensive form game between player 1 and player 2. T B (2, 2) L R R (3, 1) (0, 0) (5, 0) (0, 1) (a). Find the normal form representation of this game. (show the bimatrix) (b). Find all pure strategy NE. (c). Which of these equilibria are subgame perfect?
Analyze payoff matrix below. a-) Consider the grim trigger strategy for the game? Analyze the conditions for which this strategy constitutes an subgame perfect equiillbria. b-) Analyze the conditions for the tit for tat strategy to be equilibrium for the following histories: Histories that ends with (C,C) and (C,D) p1/p2 D 3.3 0.5 D 5,0 1,1
Paramter y = 0 If ⟨a, d⟩ is played in the first period and ⟨b, e⟩ is played in the second period, whatis the resulting (repeated game) payoff for the row player?
Consider the following coordination game: Player 2P1 Comedy Show Concert Comedy Show 11,5 0,0 Concert 0,0 2,2 a. Find the Nash equilibrium(s) for this game.b. Now assume Player 1 and Player 2 have distributional preferences. Specifically, both people greatly care about the utility of the other person. In fact, they place equal weight on their outcome and the other person’soutcome, ρ = σ = ½. Find the Nash equilibrium(s) with these utilitarianpreferences.c. Now consider the case where Player1 and Player2 do not like each other. Specifically, any positive outcome for the other person is viewed as anegative outcome for the individual, ρ = σ = -1. Find the Nashequilibrium(s) with these envious preferences.
In equilibrium, what is the probability that player 1 will use the pure strategy E in this game?
Consider the following game: p 2,10 0,5 5,2 0,5 5,10 Which of the following is FALSE for the SPE of this game? a. If p in [0.6, 1], then playing x is an equilibrim strategy for player 1 b. If p in [0, 0.6], then playing y is an equilibrim strategy for player 1 C. For all possible p values in [0,1], playing x is an equilibrium strategy for player 1 y y R Nature 1 2 1-p y R X 2,10
Consider the payoff matrix below, which describes a symmetric A B A 17,17 0,14 B 14,0 8,8 (a) Find all Nash equilibria of this game, including any mixed strategy equilibria. (b) Draw the expected payoff difference diagram for this game, including all the Nash equilibria you found in (a). is (c) What would you expect to occur most frequently when this game played as a lab experiment? Justify your answer using your answers from (a) and (b).
please solve it in 30 minute please Consider an infinitely repeated game where the stage game is the game of chicken: Swerve Straight Swerve 0,0 -1,1 Straight 1, –1 -10, -10 Assume that the discount factor is very close to one. For concreteness, you can assume that d = 0.99. (a) Is there an SPE in which player l's payoff is 1/(1 – 6)? Explain. (b) Is there an SPE in which each player gets a payoff of 0? Explain. (c) Is there an SPE in which player l's payoff is -2/(1 – 8)? Explain.
(a) Design a two-player game with the property that "the payoff for Player1 is Playerl plays a strategy Sl and Player2 plays a strategy S2 is the same as the payoff for Player2 if Player2 plays Sl and Playerl plays S2". Express your game in terms of payoff matrices. Show the above property holds in your given payoff matrices. Give a case to show that there is one Nash equilibrium and such an equilibrium is also a Pareto efficient (justify your answers) in your given payoff matrices. Prove or disprove the above case that is unique. Give another example to show that there are two Nash equilibria in your given payoff matrices.