preview

European Imperialism In Africa

Decent Essays

New Imperialism in Africa was caused by many factors, and had a great impact on the histories of both Europe and Africa, because of Europe’s gain of land, money, and power, and Africa’s loss of culture and way of life. Although I see and understand motives by the Europeans, I do not agree that they were justified for their actions in Africa. New Imperialism was a period of colonial expansion into closer regions, such as Africa, by the strong European nations in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. In 1869, the French finished the Suez Canal in Egypt, which connects the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea, which ultimately leads to the Indian Sea. This shortcut to India was wanted by all of Europe, and this worried Britain about their colony …show more content…

The Principle of Effective Occupation explained effectively occupied territory, and this structure created even more competition and tension between the European powers. The reasons for imperialism went much further than increasing wealth, such as industrialization, nationalism, social Darwinism, and having obligations to civilize. Written works were written about both the developments of imperialism and colonization, and also their justifications, as pertaining to their countries, such as Friedrich Fabri’s “Does Germany Need Colonies?” and Jules Ferry’s “Defense of French Imperialism”. Fabri describes the reasons why Germany must embark on colonial expansion, how it “has become a matter of life-or-death” (Fabri 1), but is still “the only way to stability and to the growth of national welfare” (Fabri 1). His justifications for keeping up with the other European powers is that Germany cannot be surpassed, so they must not “delay no longer in the task of renewing the call for colonies” (Fabri 2). These European countries were initially after ways to increase their capitalism, and with a surplus in goods, came the idea of creating more markets in …show more content…

Almost every action done by Europeans was with the motive of gaining more wealth and becoming more powerful, and this includes imperialism. In the eyes of the Europeans, by civilizing the natives, the markets created far outweighed the losses of life and also culture to the natives. In my eyes, it was not at all justified. The loss of thousands of years of culture is not worth the expansion, money, or power. It was only a facade that all Europeans agreed with the imperialistic empire, as seen in “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell. The narrator, a European police officer in Burma saw that “imperialism was an evil thing” and “was all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British.” The story shows the expectation placed on the Europeans to uphold this superiority, as seen with the narrator shooting the elephant “solely to avoid looking a fool” in front of the natives. I think that the people agreeing with imperialism were the minority in population, but they were the majority in power, which is why the majority of the world started as European colonies. All in all, I do not believe the Europeans were justified for their actions in Africa, and this part of history directly influenced the

Get Access