Diversity in organisations is seen to be an imperative part of any company in this day and age. Many companies are adopting diversity policies to ensure that the benefits of having a diverse cohort are realised. In order to achieve these benefits, diverse employees need to be treated fairly and respectfully, which comes under the moral case of an organisation. The business case is concentrated primarily on how a set of diverse employees can be used to a company’s advantage in terms of profits and public image etc. Although these two cases focus on different aspects of diversity, the moral case of organisations and society can often profit an organisation in more ways than one.
The moral case in business focuses on equal opportunity amongst
…show more content…
Due to the many different types of ethnicities people belong to, it’s often the case that the populace encourages inclusion and the mixture of these cultures. Not only is this the case in Australian society, but this is also seen to be encouraged in many Australian businesses. In these establishments, it is required by law to employ people based on merit and not on the primary dimensions of diversity such as age, gender, ethnicity etc. (Amaliyah 2014 p.177). This is further reinforced by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commissions Act 1986, which doesn’t allow exclusion based on these dimensions, but rather encourages diversity. Even though this legislation is enforced in a moral sense, it can nonetheless have a positive effect on a …show more content…
It allows for the employment search of potential candidates that specifically focuses on skills, thus having a disregard for age, disability etc. (Dutta 2015), which potentially leads to the employment of top talent that could be very valuable to a company. It is also particularly noteworthy that companies open up the labour pool as Australia’s population is maturing due to the Baby Boomers pursuing retirement options, which leads companies to question whether there is sufficient employment possibilities to uphold the service industries and income the economy has come to anticipate from the Australian labour force (Jericho 2014). Therefore, if companies are open to other options, they will be able to deal with the pressure the economy is putting on business in Australia.
The Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ) is a company that acknowledges that diversity can have a strong input into their organisation and allow for many awards to be reaped. As a business, ANZ ensures that the strengths of people’s diverse backgrounds are celebrated. Through these strengths, it is hoped that strong connections are formed with customers and that they are innovative in their business decisions (Diversity n.d.). These strengths may not have been present if it weren’t for organisations
Making sure equality and diversity procedures are followed in a business environment will impacts on overall success of organisation. By recognising the strengths of differences between individuals company can get a great advantage in terms of employee motivation and clients satisfaction.
Auburn is a suburb in western Sydney in the state of New South Wales Australia which had major changes that occurred over the years, the three major changes are transport population and culture.
Australia has been a culturally diverse society since long before white settlement. The indigenous people had many different cultures, languages and customs, even members of the First Fleet came from a number of culturally significant backgrounds. Diversity in Australia took large strides 67 years ago with the beginning of the Snowy River Scheme which promoted skilled immigrants to come here and work, because as a nation just after World War II we lacked the manpower and knowledge to complete such a large and complicated project.
Throughout the book The Loudest Duck by Laura A. Liswood, we learn about what it means to be truly diverse and how to obtain this diversity. The book gives many examples of how and why it is important for companies to be diverse. Through this paper I will be outlining the main points the other made and share some of the lessons I feel are important.
Slowly, society is changing its views about diversity. Beginning with strong legislation regarding anti-discrimination in the workplace, laws have been established, in the United States, from the Civil Rights Act and Title VII of 1964 (which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, sex, religion, and natural origin), Age Discrimination Act of 1967, Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, just to name a few. These, and a multitude of other laws, have been created as a need to comply with equal opportunity employment objectives as well as a personal feeling of wanting to “do the right thing.” Now, many decades later, it’s not just doing the right thing but rather doing the “smart thing”. With a global economy, a technological revolution, and both customers and suppliers coming from diverse backgrounds, it makes
On the other hand, 1.7% of the ADF workforce are now indigenous Australians, and they are provided with a plethora of opportunities. Here is two for example:
6). The Diversity and Equity policy (DET 2013) was created to respond to the growingly diverse Victorian Community. Many Victorians face issues of racism and bullying and due to cultural and religious backgrounds, as well as socio-economic status, many do not experience equal or equitable opportunities. This is due to the emergence of our society as neo-liberal. Neo-liberalism means that ‘the agenda of economic and social transformation’ (Connell, 2013, p. 99) has moved from public agencies to ‘companies selling services in a market.’ A society modelled under neo-liberalism is skewed to support those with money and privilege, a majority of which, in Australian society, are middle class Anglo-Australians. As a result, the issues of equity and diversity within a neo-liberal society leave those affected at a marked disadvantage in comparison to the majority of Australians. The Diversity and Equity policy (DET 2013) is an attempt to improve the disadvantage experienced by the
Multiculturalism has evolved and changed over time to become more inclusive of minority groups. From federation to the mid twentieth century the ‘White Australia Policy’ was enforced. This policy aimed to limit non-European migrants to enter Australia to preserve ‘white Australia’. The dictation test was also prevalent up until 1958 (Robertson, Hohmann, & Stewart, 2005, p. 241). This test
While the world has unanimously advanced and is more accepting of change, the workplace continues to be a place of discrimination, prejudice and inequality. Discrimination is broadly defined to ‘distinguish unfavourably’, isolate; and is context based (Pagura, 2012). Abrahams (1991) described the workplace as an ‘inhospitable place’ where gender disparity and wage gaps persist (Stamarski & Son Hing, 2015). Among other states and countries, the Australian government actively implements and passes laws to protect and maintain equal employment rights. While the objective of these laws is ‘to eliminate discrimination,’ the regulatory mechanisms in the legislation are largely ineffective at achieving this ultimate goal (Smith, 2008). However,
The general line of reasoning is that if we learn to incorporate each other’s diverse traits and characteristics in the workplace, we can then use these differences to foster an innovative environment, which will give the company a competitive advantage over the competitors that do not accept workforce diversity. According to the Allied Academies International Conference, “Diversity is rapidly becoming a common practice among companies due to the increasing number of minorities entering the job market today. As these groups become more prevalent throughout companies, upper-level employees are facing numerous challenges when determining what changes must take place to create a positive working environment for everyone. Management is responsible for the development and implementation of effective policies directly relating to diversity to ensure the acceptance of minorities into the workplace and to aid in minorities’ success through equal opportunities and treatment.” (Marcia L. James, 2001, Academy for Studies in International Business Proceedings)
In addition, equality focus on the human right or social justice which is” based on legitimacy, rather than economic circumstance” (Noon, 2007, p781). However, equality is no longer suitable with the competitive international market nowadays, as Kirton and Greene (2016) argued that because of focusing only on the moral and social justice, the equality policy brings little advantages to the company, thus, diversity management policies offer the advantages directly to the success of the companies.
Organisations have sought out to have a more diverse workforce, as it is claimed to increase organisational effectiveness. A team with individuals from different social group, personalities, values and beliefs, and etcetera, when managed well, can be an asset to the organisation. More often than not, there will be some sort of discrimination in the workplace, especially with a very diverse workforce. Therefore, with proper training and benefits to ensure the development of these employees, and legislation and policy to ensure equality and reduce discrimination within the workforce, it can drive competitive advantage and organisational profit. When looking at diversity in the workforce, the business case and the moral case justification are often necessary. The following paragraphs will talk more about the business case and moral case, and the linkages between them, as well as the theories and conceptual frameworks for the business and moral cases justification for diversity management in organisations.
Managing diversity and equality effectively in the workplace is the core responsibility of any organization in the contemporary business world. Shen, Chanda, D’Netto and Monga (2009) conducted a survey whose results revealed the massive diversity within the British society in terms of ethnicity, nationality and religion. As a result, the Equality Act of 2010 was formulated and became law whose provisions focus on legal protection against discrimination based on gender re-assignment, marriage, civil partnership, age, disability, sexual orientation, religion, pregnancy and maternity, sex and beliefs (Monks, 2007). Therefore, managing diversity in the workplace is critical towards the achievement of equality and discrimination free working environment. Bhatia (2008) observed that the ability to understand, accept, value, acknowledge and celebrate differences among people with respect to race, sexual orientation, religion, age, ethnicity and mental ability within an organization is crucial in eliminating discrimination. Discrimination refers to the tendency of denying equal treatment to people believed to be members of the same social group (Ozbilgin, 2009). In other words, discrimination in the work place is related to denial of equal treatment in terms of promotion, compensation, career development, training and empowerment. Therefore, managing diversity in the work place is crucial towards the achievement of a discrimination free working environment and the
Managing diversity within organisation is about ‘recognising this range of differences in people and valuing people as individuals, respecting their differences and their differing needs. It is also about accommodating differences wherever possible so that an individual can play a full part in the working environment’ (Daniels and Macdonald, 2005)
Diversity in workforce “include, but are not limited to: age, ethnicity, ancestry, gender, physical abilities/qualities, race, sexual orientation, educational background, geographic location, income, marital status, military experience, religious beliefs, parental status, and work experience”(Thomas 1992). Diversity in the workforce is initially perceived as a response toward the increasing diversity of the consumers in the market (Agocs & Burr, 1996). From there, it has been observed that capitalizing on existing differences among the employees provide benefits to the organization. Diversity in workforce fosters and encourages