preview

ASPCA Advertisement Analysis

Decent Essays

According to the ASPCA website, every sixty seconds an animal is abused. Abuse can be in the form of beating, neglecting, or shearing for fur. Animal abuse is a crime that happens far too often in this country. Many cases of animal abuse go undocumented because dogs, cats, horses, birds, sheep, rabbits, etc. do not have a voice. Animal rights organizations try giving these animals a voice to stop horrible abuse. The Humane Society, ASPCA, and Peta display various images, choose specific diction, and express tone to motivate their audience to contribute to their campaign. These campaigns inform people through their advertisements about the issues occurring by using similar and different methods.
Each of these advertisements has the same goal …show more content…

The first advertisement, The Humane Society uses diction to motivate their audience to adopt their pets. The text states “Be a hero for animals”, the word “hero” makes the audience feel like they could have a powerful role in helping these animals find a home. The second part of the text says, “Don’t let another animal be a victim of cruel and senseless abuse”. The Humane Society puts the blame on the audience by implying they have been allowing animals to be abused. The text makes it seem like if the audience does not act now, animal abuse will continue. The audience will feel guilty if they do not adopt a pet. As for the second advertisement, it states, “Her life is in your hands”. Instead of putting the blame on the audience like the first advertisement, it puts pressure on the audience to donate to the ASPCA organization. However, similarly to the first advertisement, it incorporates guilt toward the audience. The text suggests the dog’s life is the responsibility of the audience and if they do not donate they would feel guilty about refusing to help abused animals. In the third advertisement, Peta says “If you wouldn’t wear your dog please don’t wear any fur”. It brings the audience to the realization that animal fur comes from defenseless animals like their own dogs. It does not bring guilt since it does not talk about the consequences of wearing fur; it simply suggests not wearing it. Near the end of the first advertisement, it says “act now” with an arrow and if it is clicked on gives the audience access to their website. The Humane Society does not specifically state what they want the audience to do to support animal rights but they leave a link with more information on how to contribute. The second advertisement does not suggest a specific way of standing up for animal rights. It gives the audience the choice of acting upon the situation. On the other hand, the third

Get Access