Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
3rd Edition
ISBN: 9781107189638
Author: Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 2.4, Problem 2.17P
To determine
The proof that
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The first four Hermite polynomials of the quantum oscillator areH0 = 1, H1 = 2x, H2 = 4x2 − 2, H3 = 8x3 − 12x.
Let p(x) = 12x3 − 8x2 − 12x + 7. Using the basis H = {H0, H1, H2, H3}, find the coordinate vector ofp relative to H. That is, find [p]H.
This is a textbook question, not a graded question
Starting with the equation of motion of a three-dimensional isotropic harmonic
ocillator
dp.
= -kr,
dt
(i = 1,2,3),
deduce the conservation equation
dA
= 0,
dt
where
1
P.P, +kr,r,.
2m
(Note that we will use the notations r,, r2, r, and a, y, z interchangeably, and similarly
for the components of p.)
In terms of the totally antisymmetric E-symbol (Levi-Civita tensor) with €123 = +1, the vector product
can be written as
(A x B) i = tijk Aj Bk,
where i, j, k = 1, 2, 3 and summation over repeated indices (here j and k) is implied.
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
For general vectors A and B, using (2) prove the following relations:
a) A x B=-B x A
b) (A x B) A = (A x B) - B = 0.
The Levi-Civita symbol is related to the Kronecker delta. Prove the following very useful
formula
€ijk€ilm = 8j18km - Sjm³ki.
(2)
Prove the formula
(3)
€imn€jmn = 2dij.
Assuming that (3) is true (and using antisymmetry of the E-symbol), prove the relation
A x (B x C) = (AC) B- (AB) C
Chapter 2 Solutions
Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Ch. 2.1 - Prob. 2.1PCh. 2.1 - Prob. 2.2PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.3PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.4PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.5PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.6PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.7PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.8PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.9PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.10P
Ch. 2.3 - Prob. 2.11PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.12PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.13PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.14PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.15PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.16PCh. 2.4 - Prob. 2.17PCh. 2.4 - Prob. 2.18PCh. 2.4 - Prob. 2.19PCh. 2.4 - Prob. 2.20PCh. 2.4 - Prob. 2.21PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.22PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.23PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.24PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.25PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.26PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.27PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.28PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.29PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.30PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.31PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.32PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.34PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.35PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.36PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.37PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.38PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.39PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.40PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.41PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.42PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.44PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.45PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.46PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.47PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.49PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.50PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.51PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.52PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.53PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.54PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.58PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.63PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.64P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- An electron with kinetic energy E = 3.10 eV is incident on a barrier of width L = 0.230 nm and height U = 10.0 eV (a) What is the probability that the electron tunnels through the barrier? (Use 9.11 10-31 kg for the mass of an electron, 1.055 ✕ 10−34 J · s for ℏ, and note that there are 1.60 ✕ 10−19 J per eV.) b) What is the probability that the electron is reflected? What If? For what value of U (in eV) would the probability of transmission be exactly 25.0% and 50.0%? c) 25.0% d) 50.0%arrow_forwardConsider the function v(1,2) =( [1s(1) 3s(2) + 3s(1) 1s(2)] [x(1) B(2) + B(1) a(2)] Which of the following statements is incorrect concerning p(1,2) ? a. W(1,2) is normalized. Ob. The function W(1,2) is symmetric with respect to the exchange of the space and the spin coordinates of the two electrons. OC. y(1,2) is an eigenfunction of the reference (or zero-order) Hamiltonian (in which the electron-electron repulsion term is ignored) of Li with eigenvalue = -5 hartree. d. The function y(1,2) is an acceptable wave function to describe the properties of one of the excited states of Lit. Oe. The function 4(1,2) is an eigenfunction of the operator S,(1,2) = S;(1) + S,(2) with eigenvalue zero.arrow_forwardConsider an object containing 6 one-dimensional oscillators (this object could represent a model of 2 atoms in an Einstein solid). There are 4 quanta of vibrational energy in the object. (a) How many microstates are there, all with the same energy? (b) If you examined a collection of 38000 objects of this kind, each containing 4 quanta of energy, about how many of these objects would you expect to find in the microstate 000004?arrow_forward
- According to the correspondence principle of quantum mechanics, the same results as in classical theory should be obtained when taking very large quantum numbers. Show that when' n o, the probability of finding a particle trapped in a well of infinite potential between x and x + Ax is Ax / L, which is independent of x; this corresponds to the classical probability.arrow_forwardProblem I mean independent of x as well as 1). In classical mechanics this doesn't change anything, but what about quantum mechanics? Show that the wave function picks up a time-dependent phase factor: exp(-iVot/ħ). What effect does this have on the expectation value of a dynamical variable? Suppose you add a constant Vo to the potential energy (by "constant"arrow_forwardProve that the free energy of a semi-classical ideal gas is given by the following relationship (ZNY F = -kT In N!arrow_forward
- Consider a small volume v in a classical ideal gas with volume V and temperature T. (N)Ne-(N) N! PN = Prove that the probability of finding N gas particles (here, not the total number of gas particles) in the volume v follows the Poisson distribution, where N is the average number of particles in the volume v.arrow_forwardA qubit is initially in state [0). Its state is then transformed by the unitary operation represented by the matrix U ¹ = ¹2 ( √3³ √ ) = √³ (10) (0) + (1¹) (11) + ½ (10) (1| + (1) (01) . a) What is the probability of the qubit to have the value 0 when measured before the transforma- tion? How about the value 1? b) What is the probability of the qubit to have the value 0 when measured after the transforma- tion? How about the value 1? c) Let's say that the qubit is measured after the transformation, and its value is found to be 1. What is the probability of the qubit to have the value 0 immediately after the measurement?arrow_forwardConsider the maximally-entangled state 1 W) = (loo) ® lø0) + |ø1) ® ]¢1)), where the orthonormal basis is defined by (3). Cos O sin 0 sin 0 cos e Now we have a quantum operator cos X - sin x U(x) = sin x cos X Assuming 0, x E R. (i) Find |vv) = (I ® U)|b). (ii) Is |Þv) still an entangled state?arrow_forward
- (AA) ²( ▲ B) ²≥ ½ (i[ÂÂ])² If [ÂÂ]=iñ, and  and represent Hermitian operators corresponding to observable properties, what is the minimum value that AA AB can have? Report your answer as a decimal number with three significant figures.arrow_forwardLet's consider a harmonic oscillator. The total energy of this oscillator is given by E=(p²/2m) +(½)kx?. A) For constant energy E, graph the energies in the range E to E + dE, the allowed region in the classical phase space (p-x plane) of the oscillator. B) For k = 6.0 N / m, m = 3.0 kg and the maximum amplitude of the oscillator xmax =2.3 m For the region with energies equal to or less than E, the oscillator number of states that can be entered D(E).arrow_forwardProperty 2 of the boundary conditions for wave functions specifies that Ψ must be continuous in order to avoid discontinuous probability values. Why can’t we have discontinuous probabilities?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Classical Dynamics of Particles and SystemsPhysicsISBN:9780534408961Author:Stephen T. Thornton, Jerry B. MarionPublisher:Cengage Learning
Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems
Physics
ISBN:9780534408961
Author:Stephen T. Thornton, Jerry B. Marion
Publisher:Cengage Learning