Whirlwind Corporation is one of the largest electrical appliance-based companies in the world. The company employs around 100,000 people and has several sub-brands under its umbrella. In 2019, the company reportedly owned 50 manufacturing and technology research centers while having a global reach in all the continents of the world. The company has been able to successfully expand globally by integrating its manufacturing plants in 11 countries and partnering with suppliers and vendors in large emerging markets like India and China. In December 2019, the safety team of Whirlwind identified that some product lines associated with the washing machine category posed a fire risk to customers of the United Kingdom. The company had sold 550,000 units in the past four years. The situation that the company faced was critical because earlier that year, the company had already announced a recall of 500,000 dryers in the same year. The product recall was due to a potential fire hazard that had caused 750 fires in the five years. Whirlwind’s brand equity was at stake as it was a forced recall initiated under the directives of the British government. Justification for Problem Definition WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION 2 For global companies like Whirlwind Corporation, brand equity is the most valuable asset. The issue is analogous to the one that Samsung faced back in 2016 when its Note category of cellphones posed a threat of getting blown off during regular use. But it has to be noted that Samsung’s response was adequate and timely. The company was able to identify the underlying technical problem and was able to resolve the issue permanently. In this case, Whirlwind had repeated a fatal mistake after already suffering from a major recall that was forced by the British Government. The executive committee had to make a hard decision for the second time in the same year. Courses of action The executive committee of Whirlwind Corporation had three options at their disposal: 1. Give the customers an option to modify or repair the sold units as the company did with its driers. 2. Issue a press release and go for a recall and arrange reimbursement for the customers. 3. Issue a press release and announce the recall of products with an option of free repair or a free replacement of the machine. Evaluate each course of action and propose a Recommendation. What will be the consequences of the proposed recommendati

Whirlwind Corporation is one of the largest electrical appliance-based companies in the world. The company employs around 100,000 people and has several sub-brands under its umbrella. In 2019, the company reportedly owned 50 manufacturing and technology research centers while having a global reach in all the continents of the world. The company has been able to successfully expand globally by integrating its manufacturing plants in 11 countries and partnering with suppliers and vendors in large emerging markets like India and China. In December 2019, the safety team of Whirlwind identified that some product lines associated with the washing machine category posed a fire risk to customers of the United Kingdom. The company had sold 550,000 units in the past four years. The situation that the company faced was critical because earlier that year, the company had already announced a recall of 500,000 dryers in the same year. The product recall was due to a potential fire hazard that had caused 750 fires in the five years. Whirlwind’s brand equity was at stake as it was a forced recall initiated under the directives of the British government. Justification for Problem Definition WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION 2 For global companies like Whirlwind Corporation, brand equity is the most valuable asset. The issue is analogous to the one that Samsung faced back in 2016 when its Note category of cellphones posed a threat of getting blown off during regular use. But it has to be noted that Samsung’s response was adequate and timely. The company was able to identify the underlying technical problem and was able to resolve the issue permanently. In this case, Whirlwind had repeated a fatal mistake after already suffering from a major recall that was forced by the British Government. The executive committee had to make a hard decision for the second time in the same year. Courses of action The executive committee of Whirlwind Corporation had three options at their disposal: 1. Give the customers an option to modify or repair the sold units as the company did with its driers. 2. Issue a press release and go for a recall and arrange reimbursement for the customers. 3. Issue a press release and announce the recall of products with an option of free repair or a free replacement of the machine. Evaluate each course of action and propose a Recommendation. What will be the consequences of the proposed recommendati

Practical Management Science

6th Edition

ISBN:9781337406659

Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.

Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.

Chapter2: Introduction To Spreadsheet Modeling

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 20P: Julie James is opening a lemonade stand. She believes the fixed cost per week of running the stand...

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

100%

Whirlwind Corporation is one of the largest electrical appliance-based companies in the

world. The company employs around 100,000 people and has several sub-brands under its

umbrella. In 2019, the company reportedly owned 50 manufacturing and technology research

centers while having a global reach in all the continents of the world. The company has been able

to successfully expand globally by integrating its manufacturing plants in 11 countries and

partnering with suppliers and vendors in large emerging markets like India and China.

In December 2019, the safety team of Whirlwind identified that some product lines

associated with the washing machine category posed a fire risk to customers of the United

Kingdom. The company had sold 550,000 units in the past four years. The situation that the

company faced was critical because earlier that year, the company had already announced a

recall of 500,000 dryers in the same year. The product recall was due to a potential fire hazard

that had caused 750 fires in the five years. Whirlwind’s brand equity was at stake as it was a

forced recall initiated under the directives of the British government.

Justification for Problem Definition

WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION

For global companies like Whirlwind Corporation, brand equity is the most valuable

asset. The issue is analogous to the one that Samsung faced back in 2016 when its Note category

of cellphones posed a threat of getting blown off during regular use. But it has to be noted that

Samsung’s response was adequate and timely. The company was able to identify the underlying

technical problem and was able to resolve the issue permanently. In this case, Whirlwind had

repeated a fatal mistake after already suffering from a major recall that was forced by the British

Government. The executive committee had to make a hard decision for the second time in the

same year.

Courses of action

The executive committee of Whirlwind Corporation had three options at their disposal:

1. Give the customers an option to modify or repair the sold units as the company did with its

driers.

2. Issue a press release and go for a recall and arrange reimbursement for the customers.

3. Issue a press release and announce the recall of products with an option of free repair or a free

replacement of the machine.

Evaluate each course of action and propose a Recommendation. What will be the consequences

of the proposed recommendation?

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here