Which of the following gives the best explanation of the differences between RADIUS and TACACS+? TACACS+ employs the UDP protocol, whereas RADIUS uses the TCP protocol. RADIUS is supported by the Cisco Secure ACS software, although TACACS+ is not supported. TACACS+ just encrypts the password, while RADIUS encrypts all of the communication that takes place. In contrast to TACACS+, which keeps authentication and authorization distinct procedures, RADIUS combines both processes into a single flow.

Which of the following gives the best explanation of the differences between RADIUS and TACACS+? TACACS+ employs the UDP protocol, whereas RADIUS uses the TCP protocol. RADIUS is supported by the Cisco Secure ACS software, although TACACS+ is not supported. TACACS+ just encrypts the password, while RADIUS encrypts all of the communication that takes place. In contrast to TACACS+, which keeps authentication and authorization distinct procedures, RADIUS combines both processes into a single flow.

LINUX+ AND LPIC-1 GDE.TO LINUX CERTIF.

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337569798

Author:ECKERT

Publisher:ECKERT

Chapter12: Network Configuration

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10RQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Design a security protocol that will allow a Mutually Agreed Session key (Kabc) to be established between three entities A, B and C. This key can then be used to secure a chat between the three entities. I want you to develop your own design based on the conditions below.Note: The session key should NOT be known to the Chat Server (S) and the Chat Server (S) can only forward the encrypted messages to A, B and C and S cannot read the messages. The secure chat between entities A, B and C must use the Chat Server (S) and session key Kabc as below: (refer image)i.e. A, B and C Do NOT communicate directly. The following conditions apply to your protocol design.1. A, B and C Never communicate directly. 2. Each entity (A, B, C and S) have a Public Key Certificate, ie. CA<<A>>, CA<<B>>, CA<<C>> and CA<<S>>. 3. The Chat Server, S, has access to all Entity Certificates that use its service and can provide these Certificate to its service users if…
Kerberos is a protocol that is based around Needham-Schroeder protocol for many to many authentications. Now answer the following questions. (Use necessary diagrams to justify your answers) i) Explain why the password of the user is not sent over the network and instead session keys are generated and shared in the Kerberos protocol. ii) The information in a TGT (Ticket Granting Ticket) is encrypted so the client cannot access the information in the TGT. However, all information in the ticket is already known to the client. Why is it still necessary to encrypt it? iii) Describe the working mechanism of how a ticket is generated between the client and server by the TGS (Ticket Granting Server) and how it is used for client-server communication.
Recall that TCP can be enhanced with SSL to provide process-to-process security services. including encryption. Does SSL operate at the transport layer or the application layer? If If the application developer wants TCP to be enhanced with SSL, what does the developer have to do?
Show the web client how to build local authentication and authorization services whenever the web client wants to access protected server resources. Which two factors must be met for stacked protocols to work? What kinds of evidence do you have to support the claim you made?
Show the web client how to activate the web server's native authentication and authorization services when the web client requests access to protected resources on the web server. Which of these two arguments in favour of layered protocols do you believe to be more convincing, the first or the second? Are there specific instances that you might use to back up your claim?
Show the web client how to construct native authentication and authorization services whenever the web client seeks access to protected server resources. Which two parameters are necessary for the support of layered protocols? What kinds of proof do you have to back up the allegation that you made?
When a web client tries to access a web server's protected resources, go through the implementation of native authentication and authorization services. Which of these two arguments in favour of layered protocols is more compelling? Provide examples to back up your point.
When a web client requests access to protected resources on a web server, demonstrate the step-by-step implementation of native authentication and authorization services. What are the two most convincing reasons why layered protocols should be used? Give examples to back up your point.
There is a thorough look at many different parts of DNS queries, such as iterated and non-iterated GET requests, authoritative and root server DNS records, and DNS searches in general.
Design a key establishment protocol that will allow a Mutually Agreed Session key (Kabc) to be established between three entities A, B and C. This key can then be used to secure a chat between the three entities. I want you to develop your own design based on the conditions below. Note: The session key should NOT be known to the Chat Server (S) and the Chat Server (S) can only forward the encrypted messages to A, B and C and S cannot read the messages,i.e. End to end encryption/privacy is to be used between the chat parties A, B and C. The secure chat between entities A, B and C must use the Chat Server (S) and session key Kabc as below: i.e. A, B and C Do NOT communicate directly and must exchange messages through the Server S. The following conditions apply to your protocol design. 1. A, B and C Never communicate directly. Each entity (A, B, C and S) have a Public Key Certificate, ie. CA<<A>>, CA<<B>>, CA<<C>> and CA<<S>>.…
For application-level proxies, decrypting end-to-end encryption might be a problem. Make a suggestion for a solution that will enable an application-level proxy to pass a protocol that encrypts its payloads.
Show step by step how native authentication and authorization services are implemented whenever a web client attempts to access the protected resources of a web server. There are primarily two camps of people that support layered protocols: the You may be able to demonstrate that what you are saying is correct by providing instances.