M12 What do the authors mean by "insulate the FOMC from the political process"? Which politicians is the FOMC being insulated from?OA State governors may pressure the FOMC to increase income tax rates to help increase tax revenues that the states collect.B. State governors may pressure the FOMC to lower income tax rates to help increase consumer spending and stimulate the economy.OC. When running for reelection, members of Congress and the president may pressure the FOMC to employ contractionary policy to help decrease the size of government deficits.OD. When running for reelection, members of Congress and the president may pressure the FOMC to employ expansionary policy without considering the long-term impacts.

FOMC is the federal open market committee that works to implement monetary policy in the economy.

What do the authors mean by "insulate the FOMC from the political process"? Which politicians is the FOMC being insulated from? OA. State governors may pressure the FOMC to increase income tax rates to help increase tax revenues that the states collect. B. State governors may pressure the FOMC to lower income tax rates to help increase consumer spending and stimulate the economy. OG. When running for reelection, members of Congress and the president may pressure the FOMC to employ contractionary policy to help decrease the size of government deficits. OD. When running for reelection, members of Congress and the president may pressure the FOMC to employ expansionary policy without considering the long-term impacts.

What do the authors mean by "insulate the FOMC from the political process"? Which politicians is the FOMC being insulated from? OA. State governors may pressure the FOMC to increase income tax rates to help increase tax revenues that the states collect. B. State governors may pressure the FOMC to lower income tax rates to help increase consumer spending and stimulate the economy. OG. When running for reelection, members of Congress and the president may pressure the FOMC to employ contractionary policy to help decrease the size of government deficits. OD. When running for reelection, members of Congress and the president may pressure the FOMC to employ expansionary policy without considering the long-term impacts.

Microeconomics

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617406

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter18: Public Choice And Special Interet Group Politics

Section18.3: Voters And Rational Ignorance

Problem 2ST

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

How might special interest groups and lobbyists influence campaigns and elections? Group of answer choices political party and influence legislation. They go door to door educating voters on campaign and election issues. While they do not participate in elections, they exercise a lot of influence through their relationships with elected officials. When politicians are elected to office, members of special interest and lobbyists take jobs working for that politician and in this way influence their work, campaigns, and elections.
What is your take on the amount of money politicians spend on political campaigns? Does it have a positive/negative impact on the economy?
In 1989, Senator Bob Packwood asked Congress’s Joint Committee on Taxation how much extra revenue the government would raise if it just started taxing 100% of all income over $200,000 per year. The Joint Committee crunched some numbers and reported an answer: $204 billion per year. a. What is wrong with this answer? In 1989, very few people made over $200,000 a year, so the estimate of the tax revenue is far too high. Increasing government spending by $204 billion each year would have generated economic growth, and subsequently even higher amounts of tax revenues. The Joint Committee on Taxation did not have the tools needed to make such an estimate accurately. No one would have an incentive to work once they had earned $200,000, so much of the taxable income would disappear.
1. Why is there a political divergence in the citizen-candidate model as opposed to Downsian electoral competition? Explain. 2. What is the difference between strategic and sincere voting? 3. Explain why multiple equilibriums occur in the citizen-candidate model?
The controversial campaign spending decision of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Select the correct answer below: O has resulted in very little change in election spending is not a very controversial and changed very little in regards to campaign spending has resulted in a sharp increase in election spending has resulted in a sharp decrease in election spending
Canada's current election system prevents strategic voting. O True False
Which of the following statements is false? a. Public choice economists often explain low voter turnouts in terms of the individual costs and benefits of voting. b. In some instances, simple majority voting leads to a project being undertaken even though the total costs of the project exceed the total benefits. c. If an individual will only vote if he or she feels that his or her vote will make a difference in the election, it is likely that he or she will vote. d. Simple majority voting fails to take into account the intensity of individuals' preferences.
Is pork-barrel spending always a bad thing? Can you think of some examples of pork-barrel projects, perhaps from your own district, that have had positive results?