Two contrasting opinions on programme remarks are as follows: (a) To make a programme intelligible and maintained, it must include extensive comments. (a) A programme should be as self-documenting as possible, with comments inserted sparingly only when the code is unclear. Language design perspectives on these two ideas. What design elements could help one perspective but not the other? What may help both?

Two contrasting opinions on programme remarks are as follows: (a) To make a programme intelligible and maintained, it must include extensive comments. (a) A programme should be as self-documenting as possible, with comments inserted sparingly only when the code is unclear. Language design perspectives on these two ideas. What design elements could help one perspective but not the other? What may help both?

C++ for Engineers and Scientists

4th Edition

ISBN:9781133187844

Author:Bronson, Gary J.

Publisher:Bronson, Gary J.

Chapter11: Introduction To Classes

Section11.1: Classes

Problem 6E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

What are the advantages of employing formal techniques, as well as the disadvantages that come along with them? It is necessary for there to be a minimum of four separate justifications in order to make use of specifications while designing software.
Two opposing views on programme comments: (a) Programmes should always include thorough comments for readability and maintenance. (a) A software should be self-documenting, with comments only when the code is perplexing. Discuss these two language design viewpoints. What design aspects aid one viewpoint but not the other? What may assist both?
Two contrasting opinions on programme comments: (a) A programme should always provide detailed comments for readability and maintenance. (a) A programme should be self-documenting, with comments only when the code is confusing. Language design-wise, discuss these two perspectives. What design elements help one perspective but not the other? What might help both?
What are the advantages of utilizing formal techniques, and what are the disadvantages of doing so? The usage of specifications in the process of developing software need to be justified by at least four different arguments.
In what ways might formal procedures improve upon informal ones? At least four arguments may be made in favor of using specifications during software development.
What are the objectives of formal techniques, and how do they achieve them?To support the usage of specifications in software development, at least four arguments must be given.
When and how should design patterns be used during software development? To what extent can you demonstrate the variety of design patterns?
What exactly are the functions that design patterns serve in the context of software development, and how can one make the best possible use of them? What are three examples of different design patterns, and how can each of these examples be explained?
When and how should design patterns be employed, and what exactly is the role that design patterns play in the development of software? How many different examples of the design are you able to provide us?
How exactly do formal processes contribute to the achievement of their objectives?In order to provide enough justification for the use of specifications throughout the software development process, at least four reasons need to be presented.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of utilizing formal methods? To utilize specifications while creating software, at least four separate justifications must be included.
What are the benefits of using formal approaches and what are the drawbacks? At least four separate justifications must be shown to support the use of specifications throughout the software development process.