Suppose that in a gravimetric analysis, you forget to dry the filter crucibles before collecting precipitate. After filtering the product, you dry the product and crucible thoroughly before weighing them. Is the apparent mass of product always high or always low? Is the error in mass systematic or random?

Suppose that in a gravimetric analysis, you forget to dry the filter crucibles before collecting precipitate. After filtering the product, you dry the product and crucible thoroughly before weighing them. Is the apparent mass of product always high or always low? Is the error in mass systematic or random?

EBK A SMALL SCALE APPROACH TO ORGANIC L

4th Edition

ISBN:9781305446021

Author:Lampman

Publisher:Lampman

Chapter20: Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions: Competing Nucleophiles

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A mixture has thre components. The percentage of sand was determined to be 26.04%, the percentage of benzoic acid was determied to be 25.92%, and the percentage of salt was determined to be 35.97%. Calculate the total precent recovery.
A student was tasked to perform gravimetric analysis of a soluble sulfate. His unknown sample weighed 0.7543 g. The sample underwentprecipitation using BaCl2 and was digested for overnight. The precipitate was then filtered off to obtain white crystalline precipitate that was collected inan ash less filter paper. In performing constant weighing, he obtained a crucible mass that is 29.9442 g. After burning his samples inside the crucible,the obtained mass was 30.3375 g. Compute for the theoretical % SO3 obtained by the student and the theoretical mass (g) of SO3 that should be obtained by the student using his weighed sample
The aluminum in a 1.200-g sample of impure ammonium aluminum sulfate was precipitated with aqueous ammonia as the hydrous Al2O3.xH2O. The precipitate was filtered and ignited at to give anhydrous Al2O3, which weighed 0.2001 g. Express the result of this analysis in terms of %NH4Al(So4)2 %Al2O3 %Al
A student was tasked to perform gravimetric analysis of a soluble sulfate. His unknown sample weighed 0.7543 g. The sample underwentprecipitation using BaCl2 and was digested for overnight. The precipitate was then filtered off to obtain white crystalline precipitate that was collected inan ash less filter paper. In performing constant weighing, he obtained a crucible mass that is 29.9442 g. After burning his samples inside the crucible,the obtained mass was 30.3375 g.29. Compute for the mass (g) of BaSO4 from the experiment.A) 0.3933B) 0.3393C) 0.3133D) 0.3951E) 0.359130. Compute for the experimental mass (g) of SO3 in grams obtained by the student.A) 0.1439B) 0.1349C) 0.1943D) 0.1394E) 0.359131. Compute for the experimental % SO3 obtained by the student.A) 73.21B) 56.33C) 17.89D) 56.89E) 72.8032. Compute for the theoretical % SO3 obtained by the studentA) 0.3933B) 56.37C) 17.33D) 17.89E) 0.425233. Compute for the theoretical mass (g) of SO3 that should be obtained by the student…
A 2.0 g of MgCO3 was dissolved and diluted to exactly 500-mL volumetric flask. If 50-mL aliquot was used in the analysis, what is the weight of MgCO3 present in the aliquot sample
Fluorite, a mineral of calcium, is a compound off the metal with fluorine. Analysis shows that a 43.35-g sample of fluorite contains 21.11 g of fluorine. Calculate the following: (a) Mass of calcium in the sample. g Ca (b) Mass fractions of calcium and fluorine in fluorite. Calculate to 3 significant figures. mass fraction Ca mass fraction F (c) Mass percents of calcium and fluorine in fluorite. Calculate to 3 significant figures. mass % Ca mass % F
A 12.63 g sample of calcium ore was dissolved in HCl and gravimetrically analyzed, through the precipitation of calcium into CaC2O4 · H2O. The precipitate was filtered, washed, dried, and ignited at 500 oC until the weight was constant, giving a final mass of 2.35 grams pure CaCO3 (100.087 g/mol). Calculate the % Calcium (40.078 g/mol) in the sample.
A student determined fluoride in a toothpaste sample using ion chromatography. A toothpaste sample of mass 0.100 g was dissolved in type I water and then quantitatively filtered through a Whatman #1 filter paper into a clean 100 ml volumetric flask. The flask was then made up to volume with type I water and mixed thoroughly.A portion of the solution was filtered through a 0.45 um filter into a sample vial for analysis. Analysis of the sample gave a fluoride concentration of 1.60 mg/l Calculate the % w/w fluoride in the original toothpaste sample. (Give your answer to 3 decimal places please)
In the Analytical Chemistry laboratory, one of the B.Sc student Ms. Fatma wanted to analyze the presence of Iron(II) ion in the water samples collected from Sohar Industrial Area in the Sultanate of Oman and analyzed by Spectrophotometric method. (1) 250.00 mL of this water sample (Solution A) known to contain unknown amount of FeSO4. She has diluted Solution A by a dilution factor 10 to make 250.00 mL solution, which she labeled Solution B. Using Spectrophotometer, she has measured the absorbance value (0.642) for Solution B at 508 nm using 1.00 cm cell (cuvet). The molar absorptivity value for Fe2* ion at 508 nm is ɛ508 = 30.8 M-1cm1. (i) What volume of the solution A did she require to make the 250.00 mL of Solution В? (ii) in (i)? What instrument should she use to transfer the volume of the Solution A calculated (ii) Concentration of FeSO4 in Solution B. (iv) Concentration of FeSO4 in Solution A. Mass of FeSO4 in Solution A (Show your calculation) (v)
Which of the following statements is true? A Liquids can be weighed using a weighing paper. B In weighing hygroscopic substances, containers should always be kept close when not in use. CAfter drying a sample in the oven, you can place it immediately inside the analytical balance. D Place solid reagents / precipitates directly on top of the balance pan.
Precipitimetry The chloride in a 4.321-g food sample was precipitated through the addition of 50.00 mL of a standard AgNO3 solution (10.00 mL AgNO3 = 11.22 mL KSCN). The precipitate was coated with nitrobenzene and the mixture was diluted to 250.0 mL. A 50.00 mL aliquot was taken from the diluted solution and required 4.56 mL back titration with a %3D standard KSCN solution (22.33 mL KSCN = 0.9758 g AgNO3). %3D Formula Masses: AgNO3 = 169.87; CI = 35.45 Calculate the following: 1. Molar concentration of KSCN solution M %3D 2. Molar concentration of AgNO3 solution M %3D 3. % (w/w) chloride in the original sample =
You are preparing a 100.0 mL standard solution needed for titration analysis. The NaOH (40 g/mol) pellets are measured to be 0.5341 g in a balance with acceptable uncertainty of +0.001 g. Mass of the pellets is recorded after taring the container. The pellets are put in a beaker and added with 50 ml distilled water measured by a graduated cylinder. The solution is then quantitatively transferred to a 100-mL volumetric flask with uncertainty of ±0.08 mL and diluted to a 100-mL mark. What is the concentration (M) of the solution and estimate its uncertainty by propagation? Assumption: There is no uncertainty in molar mass. Express your answer as C+/- u M.