Suppose a firm is investing in a pollution control technology to meet a regulation in three years that can reduce its emissions for any given level of output. The technology costs $40,000 to install now, but will cost only $10,000 three years later due to expected innovations. If the firm does not comply, it will have to pay fines with the amount of $5000 in the next year, $10,000 in two years, and $15,000 in three years. With an interest rate of 3%, should the firm install this technology now or later?

Suppose a firm is investing in a pollution control technology to meet a regulation in three years that can reduce its emissions for any given level of output. The technology costs $40,000 to install now, but will cost only $10,000 three years later due to expected innovations. If the firm does not comply, it will have to pay fines with the amount of $5000 in the next year, $10,000 in two years, and $15,000 in three years. With an interest rate of 3%, should the firm install this technology now or later?

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)

14th Edition

ISBN:9781305506381

Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Chapter17: Long-term Investment Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2.2CE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Data indicates that 20,000 cars in your town face unrecoverable losses totaling $24273776 annually due to theft and accidents. If insurance covers these losses, and 31% of premiums are set aside for operational costs, what premium should be charged to car owners?
There is a company that emits a moderate amount of fossil fuel emissions. It would cost them 10 dollars to reduce emissions by 1 tonne, an additional 15 dollars to reduce emissions by a second tonne, an additional 25 dollars to reduce emissions by a third tonne, an additional 30 dollars to reduce emissions by a fourth tonne, and an additional 100 dollars to reduce emissions for a fifth tonne. If the price for a 1 tonne of emissions in a cap-and-trade program is 25 dollars, how many tonnes of emissions is the company likely to reduce? a. one tonne b. two tonnes c. three tonnes d. four tonnes c. 5 tonnes
Air pollution in the country of Gawanza has grown over the last ten years with an increase in manufacturing industries. The government of Gawanza now has a plan to reduce the CO2 emissions into the air by 10% per year over the next 10 years. What do you expect will happen? The marginal cost and marginal benefits to Gawanza of reducing CO2 will be lowest in the last few years of implementing this plan. The marginal cost and marginal benefits to Gawanza of reducing CO2 will be lowest in the last few years of implementing this plan. The marginal cost of reducing CO2 will be the highest and marginal benefits of reducing CO2 will be the lowest in year ten. The marginal cost of reducing CO2 will be the highest and marginal benefits of reducing CO2 will be the lowest in year ten. The marginal cost and marginal benefits to Gawanza of reducing CO2 will be highest in the last few years of implementing this plan. The marginal cost and marginal benefits to Gawanza of reducing…
Owning, operating, and maintaining an automobile carries with it private internal costs to the driver, as well as public external societal costs. List five internal and external costs
A diesel refinery is upstream of an industrial farm. The runoff from the refinery pollutes the river and damages the crops. The farm earns $499 using the polluted water, but would earn $628 if it were clean. The refinery earns $1772 but would only earn $1607 if it had to divert resources to prevent the runoff. There are no environmental laws. Assume that a scrubbing machine that would prevent the runoff costs $24 plus an installation cost. What is the most that installation could cost for clean water to be the socially optimal outcome achieved through private bargaining? O a. $141.00 O b. $36.00 O c. Anything, the machine is not required as clean water will already be achieved. O d. $105.00 O e. $165
True or False If it costs $1 million to remove 90% of some pollutant from industrial wastewater, then removal of the next 9% might cost an additional million dollars. To get the water 99.9% clean might cost a total of $3 million, and so on.
The Upstream Nukem Co. uses a technology that produces pollutants as a by-product. The company dumps these pollutants into Radiant River. The only way that Nukem can reduce pollution is by cutting output. Nukem's profits, expressed as a function of the amount æ (in tons) of pollutants per day, is IIN(x) = 80x - 5x² The pollution adversely affects the performance of Downstream Glowing Fisheries. Glowing's profit, as a function of the quantity of pollution, is given by IIG(x) = K - 5x² where K is a constant relating to all factors other than pollution. (i) If there are no restraints on pollution and no negotiations between the two companies, how much pollution will Nukem produce per day? x =. O 10 8 06 O 4 02 (ii) What is the socially optimal quantity of pollution? * 02 O 4 O 3 O 1 05 ||
13. The marginal benefit of being able to emit a ton of sulfur dioxide emissions for two firms are given by: MBx = 1000 – (Ex / 2 ) MBY = 600 – (Ey / 3 ) Note that these marginal benefit figures can be interpreted as marginal cost of abating emission down to levels Ex and Ey. Government regulators want to reduce total sulfur dioxide emissions to a total of 1800 tons. a) If the government imposes the same standard of 900 tons maximum emissions on both firms what would be the total cost of abatement (calculated as the aggregated marginal benefits forgone)? b) If the government distributed 900 tradable pollution permits (one ton each) to each firm what would be the final allocation of these permits after the firms trade them? What would be the total cost of abatement in this latter case?
There are two polluters in an industry with the following cost functions: MAC1 = 182 - 0.14E1 MAC2 = 144 - 0.06E2 The government establishes a tradable pollution permit system and gives each polluter 800 permits (1600 permits in total). What will be the net gain for Polluter 1 from the trade?
A cement factory is located near a river which is also used for training sessions by a team of swimmers. When the factory dumps chemicals in the water, the river cannot be used for swimming. Experts estimate that it would cost $100,000 to install a purifying equipment that would completely eliminate the chemicals from the river. Moving the swimming team to train at a different location would cost $90,000 and thus the purifying equipment would not be necessary. 2.1. Identify the 2 externalities. 2.2. What result (theorem) can be applied to fix these externalities? Why might this theorem work in this case? 2.3. What solution would the two parties choose if the right to a clean river is granted to the swimming team and who would bear the costs of fixing the externality problem?
Suppose a power generating plant emits particulates that damage crops and affect human health. The relationship between emissions and environmental damage is represented by the marginal damage function, MD=9e where e represents tons of emissions per month. The cost to the firm (and society) of eliminating emissions is represented the marginal abatement cost function, MAC=108.5 - 6.5e Both MD and MAC are dollar costs per month. If the power generating firm were allowed to ignore the social cost of its emissions, what would be the firm’s monthly emission level? Calculate the socially efficient level of pollution. If the emissions calculated in part B is a level found to shorten some people’s lives, could it still be considered socially efficient? Suppose the EPA set an emission standard at the socially efficient level calculated in part B. Calculate the cost to the firm of achieving this standard. Suppose that instead of a standard, the EPA charged an emissions tax. The tax is set at…
how can Liquid waste be an important aspect of waste management in any society