Selection structures are very essential in programming; yet, they are not capable of doing the task on their own. Almost every software has to cope with the scenario when we have to repeat the same sequence of statements for a variety of different customers or transactions or online clients or anything. To accomplish these objectives, what types of organizational structures are required? What are the most significant distinctions between these three structures?

Selection structures are very essential in programming; yet, they are not capable of doing the task on their own. Almost every software has to cope with the scenario when we have to repeat the same sequence of statements for a variety of different customers or transactions or online clients or anything. To accomplish these objectives, what types of organizational structures are required? What are the most significant distinctions between these three structures?

Management Of Information Security

6th Edition

ISBN:9781337405713

Author:WHITMAN, Michael.

Publisher:WHITMAN, Michael.

Chapter6: Risk Management: Assessing Risk

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 11RQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Selection structures are frequently used in programming, although they cannot handle everything. Every software must make the same statements for different consumers, internet clients, transactions, and so on. Do these jobs need specialized frameworks? What distinguishes these structures?
Programming cannot exist without the use of selection structures, however these structures are not without flaws. Because of the large number of users, online customers, and diverse types of transactions, each application must follow the same iterative method. Are those working in these fields required to comply by a certain code of ethics? What exactly is it that sets these constructions apart from others?
Although while selection structures play a crucial role in programming, they are not perfect. Any program that deals with a large number of users, whether they are consumers, online clients, or any other kind of transaction, has to use the same iterative approach. Do those working in these fields adhere to a code of conduct? What makes these structures unique in comparison to others?
While selection structures are crucial in programming, they have their limits. There are some phrases that must be repeated again and over in every program since they apply to every consumer, online client, transaction, etc. Do these professions need unique structures? Just what is it about these buildings that sets them apart?
Although selection structures play a crucial role in programming, they are not perfect. Every application requires the same iterative procedure because of the high volume of consumers, online clients, and other forms of transactions. Do those working in these fields adhere to a code of conduct? What makes these structures unique in comparison to others?
It is worthwhile to think about using structured language to describe processes that are not part of a systems analysis.
Software development and software modeling are two different processes. There has to be a very thorough explanation of the part that each person performs in the growth process. Right? I only wanted to confirm the accuracy of what I had read about you referencing a UML diagram in your post.
Structured language should be used to describe processes that don't entail systems analysis.
Despite their importance, selection structures cannot complete the job on their own. All of us have to deal with the circumstance of having to repeat a succession of statements for various customers or transactions, or for online clients, at some point. To what extent do these jobs need certain types of frameworks? In what way are they different?
Consider the following example: As a software developer, you have been tasked with developing a hospital patient control program. Everything is explained to you right away, and the system requires a high level of dependability. In your perspective, which process model would you propose for this kind of software? In addition to giving compelling reasons in favor of your suggested process model, the description of the recommended process model should be precise and succinct, with the assistance of a visual.
What, in your opinion as a software developer, are the most important functions that design patterns serve? How may these cases be used to define three distinct types of design patterns?
You may find it useful to utilize structured English when describing procedures that are beyond the scope of systems analysis.