Scott requested Jenny to work with the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) in further reducing the tax liability of thecompany believing her to be an accountant. Meanwhile, Jennytook advantage of Scott’s mistaken belief and trust and convinced him that he would reduce the company’s tax liability by 50% in exchange for a substantive number of shares in the company. Is Scott’s donation of a substantive number of the company’s shares to Jenny valid? Why or whynot?

Scott requested Jenny to work with the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) in further reducing the tax liability of thecompany believing her to be an accountant. Meanwhile, Jennytook advantage of Scott’s mistaken belief and trust and convinced him that he would reduce the company’s tax liability by 50% in exchange for a substantive number of shares in the company. Is Scott’s donation of a substantive number of the company’s shares to Jenny valid? Why or whynot?

SWFT Comprehensive Vol 2020

43rd Edition

ISBN:9780357391723

Author:Maloney

Publisher:Maloney

Chapter19: Corporations: Distributions Not In Complete Liquidation

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 48P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

John Taylor, a tax consultant, charges his clients a fee based on the percentage of the tax he saves a client. John received a payment from a client, but he realised that Angela didn’t declare income. Therefore, the income tax return that John’s prepared understated income tax liability.Taking into consideration the Accounting Professional Code of Conduct explain the Tax Penalties and actions John should take following his discovery.
Scott requested Jenny to work with the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) in further reducing the tax liability of the company believing her to be an accountant. Meanwhile, Jenny took advantage of Scott’s mistaken belief and trust and convinced him that he would reduce the company’s tax liability by 50% in exchange for a substantive number of shares in the company. Is Scott’s donation of a substantive number of the company’s shares to Jenny valid? Why or why not?
If Bob takes an improper deduction for $10,000 by mistake because he misunderstood the tax law, and Jane knowingly takes a $10,000 improper deduction because she thinks the IRS will not catch it, then should the two taxpayers be treated differently? If your answer is yes that Bob should not be viewed as a tax evader, then what is stopping Jane from asserting ignorance if she is caught?
Your group has formed an Accounting Practice business partnership. Your area of expertise is in Income Tax matters in Australia. Jonathan is one of your clients and he has come to see you seeking advice on how to minimize his tax. You explain to Jonathan of the many ways in which to reduce his tax liability. Jonathan is most impressed by what you have told him and he pays a fee for your professional advice and then carries out your suggestions on tax minimisation. Unfortunately, you have misread the tax legislation and as a result Jonathan is audited by the Australian Taxation Office who then issues him with a tax liability of $600,000.00 plus interest. Discuss what the consequences are to your group for giving Jonathan bad advice.
First Metro Pacific was able to persuade Francis to join the company as its Assistant Vice President for Finance which included a car plan worth P3,000,000 in its compensation The company purchased the vehicle and registered the same in favor of Francis. Assuming further that Francis is a non-resident alien not engaged in trade or business, how much is the fringe benefits tax?
In one of the following situations, the member acted properly. Which one? Group of answer choices a. Joe was providing consulting services to client Lowery Company and in that capacity learned trade secrets that he used to convince Richter Corporation to hire him as a consultant who could help Richter compete against Lowery. b. Fiona prepared a joint tax return for Tom and Pam, a married couple. When Tom and Pam got into a vicious divorce proceeding, Fiona helped Pam, whom she perceived to be the wronged party, and refused to share any information with Tom, whom she thought was a bad husband. c. Han prepared corporate income tax returns for Nadle Corporation until he became uncomfortable with how aggressive in seeking deductions Nadle was asking him to be. He“fired” Nadle as a client. When Nadle sought to replace Han with Jennifer, she called Han and asked: “What can you tell me about Nadle?” Han replied: “Well, I think you should ask Nadle to grant me permission to speak…
Mr A has formed an Accounting Practice business partnership. Your area of expertise is in Income Tax matters in Australia. Jonathan is one of your clients and he has come to see you seeking advice on how to minimize his tax. MR A explains to Jonathan of the many ways in which to reduce his tax liability. Jonathan is most impressed by what MR A has told him and he pays a fee for his professional advice and then carries out Mr A's suggestions on tax minimisation. Unfortunately, MR A has misread the tax legislation and as a result Jonathan is audited by the Australian Taxation Office who then issues him with a tax liability of $600,000.00 plus interest. Discuss what the consequences are to MR A for giving Jonathan bad advice.