Say that Alland can produce 32 units of food per person per year or 16 units of clothing per person per year, but Georgeland can produce 36 units of food per year or 18 units of clothing. Which of the following is true? Alland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing food. Alland has both an absolute and a comparative advantage in producing food. Georgeland has both an absolute and a comparative advantage in producing clothing. ● Georgeland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing clothing.

Say that Alland can produce 32 units of food per person per year or 16 units of clothing per person per year, but Georgeland can produce 36 units of food per year or 18 units of clothing. Which of the following is true? Alland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing food. Alland has both an absolute and a comparative advantage in producing food. Georgeland has both an absolute and a comparative advantage in producing clothing. ● Georgeland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing clothing.

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter33: International Trade

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 30P: In Japan, one worker can make 5 tons of rubber or 80 radios. In Malaysia, one worker can make 10...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In Japan, one worker can make 5 tons of rubber or 80 radios. In Malaysia, one worker can make 10 tons of rubber or 40 radios. Who has the absolute advantage in the production of rubber or radios? How can you tell? Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 80 additional radios in Japan and in Malaysia. (Your calculation may involve fractions, which is fine,) Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of radios? Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 10 additional tons of rubber in Japan and in Malaysia. Which country has a comparative advantage in producing rubber? In this example, does each country have an absolute advantage and a comparative advantage in the same good? In what product should Japan specialize? In what product should Malaysia specialize?
In Germany it takes three workers to make one television and four workers to make one video camera. In Poland It takes six workers to make one television and 12 workers to make one video camera. Who has the absolute advantage in the production of televisions? Who has the absolute advantage in the production of video cameras? How can you tell? Calculate the opportunity cost of producing one additional television set in Germany and In Poland. (Your calculation may involve fractions, which Is tine.) Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of televisions? Calculate the opportunity cost of producing one video camera in Germany and in Poland. Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of video cameras? In this example, is absolute advantage the same as comparative advantage, or not? In what product should Germany specialize? In what product should Poland specialize?
Brazil can produce 100 pounds of beef or 10 autos. In contrast the United States can produce 40 pounds of beef or 30 autos. Which country has the absolute advantage in beef? Which country has the absolute advantage in producing autos? What is the opportunity cost of producing one pound of beef In Brazil? What is the opportunity cost of producing one pound of beef in the United States?
Say that Alland can produce 24 units of food per person per year or 6 units of clothing per person per year, but Georgeland can produce 36 units of food per year or 6 units of clothing. Which of the following is true? Georgeland has a comparative advantage, but not an absolute advantage, in producing food. Georgeland has both a comparative and absolute advantage in producing food. Alland has both absolute advantage and comparative advantage, in producing food.
LENTILS (Millions of pounds) 80 70 8 60 50 40 30 20 10 + 0 0 PPF 10 Shenandoah 20 30 40 50 60 PEAS (Millions of pounds) 70 80 (?) LENTILS (Millions of pounds) 80 70 60 50 40 30 PPF 20 10 0 0 T 10 Denali 40 20 30 50 60 PEAS (Millions of pounds) 70 80 (?) Shenandoah has a comparative advantage in the production of , while Denali has a comparative advantage in the production of . Suppose that Shenandoah and Denali specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a comparative advantage. After specialization, the two countries can produce a total of peas. million pounds of lentils and million pounds of Suppose that Shenandoah and Denali agree to trade. Each country focuses its resources on producing only the good in which it has a comparative advantage. The countries decide to exchange 20 million pounds of peas for 20 million pounds of lentils. This ratio of goods is known as the price of trade between Shenandoah and Denali. The following graph shows the same PPF for Shenandoah…
Say that Alland can produce 32 units of food per person per year or 16 units of clothing per person per year, but Georgeland can produce 16 units of food per year or 8 units of clothing. Which of the following is true? Question 35 options: Georgeland has a comparative advantage, but not an absolute advantage, in producing clothing. Georgeland has both a comparative and absolute advantage in producing clothing. Alland has a comparative advantage, but not an absolute advantage, in producing food. Alland has an absolute advantage, but not comparative advantage, in producing food.
In Country T, it takes 10 resources to produce 1 ton of cocoa and 13.5 resources to produce 1 ton of rice. In Country Y, it takes 40 resources to produce 1 ton of cocoa and 20 resources to produce 1 ton of rice. Country T has a comparative advantage over Country Y in cocoa. This follows the theory of comparative advantage, and we can say that engaging in free trade benefits all countries that participate in it; however, this conclusion stems from which of these inaccurate assumptions? Multiple Choice We have assumed constant returns to scale. We have assumed the prices of resources and exchange rates in the two countries are dynamic. We have assumed there are barriers to the movement of resources from the production of one good to another within the same country. We have assumed that agrarian nations do not specialize in producing particular products. We have assumed diminishing returns to specialization.
COFFEE (Millions of pounds) 48 42 36 30 24 18 12 6 0 PPF 1 Maldonia 36 30 POTATOES (Millions of pounds) 06 12 18 24 42 48 COFFEE (Millions of pounds) 48 42 36 30 24 18 12 6 0 PPF 1 0 6 Lamponia 18 42 12 24 30 36 POTATOES (Millions of pounds) 48 Consider the above two graphs which represent production possibilities. What are the comparative advantages? Maldonia has a comparative advantage in potatoes and Lamponia has a comparative advantage in coffee Maldonia has a comparative advantage in both goods O Lamponia has a comparative advantage in both goods O Maldonia has a comparative advantage in coffee adn Lamponia has a comparative advantage in potatoes
Which country has comparative advantage in the production of food? Explain. See attached.