Sarah has a coefficient of risk aversion of 2. Sheng has a coefficient of risk aversion of 4. Given their risk preferences, we do not expect that... Select one: a. The indifference curves of Sheng are steeper than those of Sarah. b. Sheng holds a higher weight of the risky assets than Sarah does. c. None of the options provided. d. Sarah and Sheng hold the same risky assets in their portfolios.

Sarah has a coefficient of risk aversion of 2. Sheng has a coefficient of risk aversion of 4. Given their risk preferences, we do not expect that... Select one: a. The indifference curves of Sheng are steeper than those of Sarah. b. Sheng holds a higher weight of the risky assets than Sarah does. c. None of the options provided. d. Sarah and Sheng hold the same risky assets in their portfolios.

Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337091985

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter9: The Basic Tools Of Finance

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

10. Karl's utility function is U(w) = 20 is w. = 300. He considers a gamble in which he could win 200 with probability p or lose 200 with probability 1 described by expected utility theory. He is indifferent between keeping his initial wealth for sure or taking the gamble if the value of p is where w is wealth. His initial wealth %3D w+200 - p. Karl's preferences in the face of risk are (a). 4 (b) .5 (c) .6 (d) .7 (e) .8
Lottery A refers to a lottery ticket that pays $2,000 with probability 0.2, $4,000with probability 0.3, $6,000 with probability 0.3, and $8,000 with probability 0.2. If Jay paid $4,001 for Lottery A, what can we conclude about his risk attitude? A. He is risk seeking B. he is risk neutral C. He is risk averse D. there is too little information to answer this question
1. Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,00 A. Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain. B. What would be the highest price (premium) that she would be willing to pay for an insurance policy that fully insures her against the flooding damage?
1. A person with U(w) = w² is facing the following lottery: there are four tickets sold, or which only one wins the prize of $100. a. Calculate the expected value of the lottery. b. Calculate the certainty equivalent. c. Comparing parts (a) and (b), what is this person's risk preference and why?
The chief executive officer of a publishing company says she is indifferentbetween the certainty of receiving $7,500 and a gamble where there is a 0.5 chance of receiving $5,000 and a 0.5 chance of receiving $10,000. a). Does she seem to be a risk averter, a risk lover, or risk- neutral? Explain. b). What is the coefficient of variation of the risky option (gamble)?
There are two portfolios available: A: Get $4 for sure B: 70% gaining $10 and 30% losing $10. The expected value of A is $ The expected value of B is $ The standard deviation of A is $ The standard deviation of B is $ (enter all answers with two decimal places.) Amanda is risk neutral, she would choose portfolio О А. В. B. Not enough information to determine. C. A. O D. A or B.
3. Suppose that Jon Snow's utility function is given by U(I)=501 where I represents annual income in thousands of dollars. a. Is Jon risk loving, risk neutral, or risk averse? Explain b. Suppose that Jon is currently earning an income of $1000 and can earn that income next year with certainty. He is offered a chance to take a new night watch job that offers a 0.25 probability of earning $2000 and a 0.75 probability of earning $500. Should he take the new night watch job?
2. Ronald has $18,000. But he is forced to bet it on the flip of a fair coin. If he wins he has $36,000. If he loses he has nothing. Ronald's expected utility function is 0.5x0.5 + 0.5y0.5, where x is his wealth if heads comes up and y is his wealth if tails comes up. What safe income would make him exactly as well off as this bet?
3. The risk free rate is 3%. The optimal risky portfolio has an expected return of 9% and standard deviation of 20%. Answer the following questions. (a) Assume the utility function of an investor is U = E(r) − 0.5Aσ2. What is condition of A to make the investors prefer the optimal risky portfolio than the risk free asset? (b) Assume the utility function of an investor is U = E(r) − 2.5σ2. What is the expected return and standard deviation of the investor’s optimal complete portfolio?
Assume that two investment opportunities have identical expected values of $100,000. Investment A has a variance of 10,500, while investment B's standard deviation is 8,000. We would expect most investors (who dislike risk) to prefer investment opportunity Select one: A. A because it provides higher potential earnings. B. B because it has less risk. C. B because of its higher potential earnings. D. A because it has less risk.
2. Kier, in The scenario, wants to determine how each of the 3 companies will decide on possible new investments. He was able to determine the new investment pay off for each of the three choices as well as the probability of the two types of market. If a company will launch product 1, it will gain 50,000 if the market is successful and lose 50,000 if the market is a failure. If a company will launch product 2, it will gain 25,000 if the market is successful and lose 25,000 if the market will fail. If a company decides not to launch any of the product, it will not be affected whether the market will succeed or fail. There is a 56% probability that the market will succeed and 44% probability that the market will fail. What will be the companies decision based on EMV? What is the decision of each company based on expected utility value?
Define risk aversion and give an example of a risk-averse person?