Right of Inspection. Jessie Rodriquez offered to deliver two trade-in vehicles—a 2003 Mitsubishi Montero and a 2002 Chevrolet Silverado pickup—to Dickey Chevrolet Buick, Inc., in exchange for a 2006 Silverado pickup. Dickey agreed. The parties negotiated a price, including a value for the trade-in vehicles, plus cash. Rodriquez paid the cash and took the Silverado. On inspecting the trade-in vehicles, however, Dickey found that they had little value. The dealer repossessed the 2006 Silverado. Did the dealership have the right to inspect the goods and reject them when it did? Why or why not

Right of Inspection. Jessie Rodriquez offered to deliver two trade-in vehicles—a 2003 Mitsubishi Montero and a 2002 Chevrolet Silverado pickup—to Dickey Chevrolet Buick, Inc., in exchange for a 2006 Silverado pickup. Dickey agreed. The parties negotiated a price, including a value for the trade-in vehicles, plus cash. Rodriquez paid the cash and took the Silverado. On inspecting the trade-in vehicles, however, Dickey found that they had little value. The dealer repossessed the 2006 Silverado. Did the dealership have the right to inspect the goods and reject them when it did? Why or why not

Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305224414

Author:JENNINGS

Publisher:JENNINGS

Chapter8: Business Crime

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6QAP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

James Koontz agreed to purchase a Plymouth Sundance from Chrysler Credit Corporation (Chrysler) in exchange for sixty payments of $185.92. Koontz soon thereafter defaulted, and Chrysler notified Koontz that, unless he made the payments, it would repossess the vehicle. Koontz responded by notifying Chrysler that he would make every effort to make up missed payments, that he did not want the car repossessed, and that Chrysler was not to enter his private property to repossess the vehicle. A few weeks later, Chrysler sent the M & M Agency to repossess the vehicle. When he heard the repossession in progress, Koontz, dressed only in his underwear, came outside and yelled, “Don’t take it!” The repossessor ignored him and took the car anyway. Koontz did not physically challenge or threaten the repossessor. a. Discuss the arguments that Chrysler legally repossessed the automobile. b. Discuss the arguments that Chrysler illegally repossessed the automobile. c. Who should prevail?
Frankfurt delivers two refrigerators to the warehouse of Duisburg who then issues a negotiable receipt undertaking the delivery of the refrigerators to "Frankfurt or bearer." Frankfurt entrusted the receipt to Leipzig for safekeeping only. Leipzig negotiated it, however, to Stuttgart who bought it in good faith and for value. Who is entitled to the delivery of the refrigerators? a. Frankfurt, since he is the real owner of the refrigerators. b. Stuttgart, since he is a purchaser in good faith and for value. c. Leipzig, since T entrusted the receipt to him. d. Duisburg, since he has as a warehouseman a lien on the goods.
Riker receives $36,000 from Troy as payment for a vehicle that has a fair value of $46,600. The $36,000 constitutes full payment for the vehicle as specified in the sales contract. Assume that the time value of money is viewed as significant for this contract. Required: (a) Did Troy pay Riker before or after delivery of the vehicle? (b) Prepare the journal entry Riker would make to record receipt of Troy's payment, assuming no interest revenue or interest expense had been recorded previously. (c) Prepare the journal entry Riker would make to record delivery of the vehicle, assuming no interest revenue or interest expense had been recorded previously. Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Req A Req B and C Did Troy pay Riker before or after delivery of the vehicle? Troy paid Riker of the vehicle.
Answer the question based on what you have learned on a legal basis. Facts: You offered to sell your automobile to Wil for P100,000.00. After inspecting the automobile, Wil offered to buy it for P80,000.00. This offer was accepted by you. The next day, you offered to deliver the automobile, but Wil being short of funds, secured postponement of the delivery, promising to pay the price “upon arrival of the steamer". The steamer however never arrived because it was wrecked by a typhoon and sank somewhere off the Coast of Samar. Question: Is there a perfected contract in this case? Why or why not? Answer:
Southern motors (seller) agreed to sell to Mr. Bean (Buyer) a specific dump truck for 1,500,000.00 for delivery cash on delivery and the payment of the price to be made on October 15 but Mr. Bean failed to pay the price. What are the remedies of southern motors?
Riker receives $43,000 from Troy as payment for a vehicle that has a fair value of $54,300. The $43,000 constitutes full payment for the vehicle as specified in the sales contract. Assume that the time value of money is viewed as significant for this contract. Required: (a) Did Troy pay Riker before or after delivery of the vehicle? (b) Prepare the journal entry Riker would make to record receipt of Troy’s payment, assuming no interest revenue or interest expense had been recorded previously. (c) Prepare the journal entry Riker would make to record delivery of the vehicle, assuming no interest revenue or interest expense had been recorded previously.
Galicia, a A5 Wagyu supplier, sold 100 40x2 containers of A5 Wagyu to Andalusia who promised to pay once he has sold all the wagyu. Andalusia meantime delivered the goods to Balearic, a warehouseman, who issued a warehouse receipt. Without the knowledge of Galicia and Balearic, Andalusia negotiated the receipt to Basque who acquired it in good faith and for value. Basque then claimed the goods from Balearic, who released them. After the wagyu were loaded on a ship bound for Manila, Galicia invokes his right to stop the goods in transit due to his unpaid lien. Who has a better right to the rice? a. Basque, since he has superior rights as a purchaser for value and in good faith. b. Basque, regardless of whether or not he is a purchaser for value and in good faith. c. Galicia, since as an unpaid seller, he has the right of stoppage in transitu. d. Balearic, since it appears that the warehouse charges have not been paid.
Al's Advertising Company trades in a red vehicle which had originally cost the Company $22,000 for a blue vehicle which has a list price of $18,600. The net book value of the red vehicle is $19,000. The car dealership allows a $17,500 trade-in but Al's Advertising Company has to pay in $1,100 to make it a fair deal. The red vehicle being traded in could be sold, if it wasn't traded in, for $17,300 on the open market as a second-hand vehicle. What value should A's Advertising use to record the blue vehicle on their books? Multiple Choice $19,000 $17,300 sale price of red vehicle on the open market $18,600 list price $18,100 $18,400
On October 2, 2020, Pronghorn Company sold $5,510 of its elite camping gear (with a cost of $3,470) to Lynch Outfitters. As part of the sales agreement, Pronghorn includes a provision that if Lynch is dissatisfied with the product, Pronghorn will grant an allowance on the sales price or agree to take the product back (although returns are rare, given the long-term relationship between Pronghorn and Lynch). Pronghorn expects total allowances to Lynch to be $770. On October 16, 2020, Pronghorn grants an allowance of $390 to Lynch because the color for some of the items delivered was a bit different than what appeared in the catalog.
Can someone help me to find the correct answer and explain it in detail? Thank you X sold his motor vehicle to V who bought it for P200,000. It turned out however, that X has 2 motor vehicles: Toyota valued at P230,000 and Lancer valued at P220,000. Which is correct? A. There is no contract of sale between X and V B. The parties may ask for interpretation or reformation C. The parties can ask for annulment of the contract D. V may choose between the Toyota or Lancer
Recently, a group of university students decided to incorporatefor the purposes of selling a process to recycle thewaste product from manufacturing cheese. Some of theinitial costs involved were legal fees and office expensesincurred in starting the business, state incorporation fees,and stamp taxes. One student wishes to charge thesecosts against revenue in the current period. Anotherwishes to defer these costs and amortize them in thefuture. Which student is correct?
Harmony Auto Group sells and services imported and domestic cars. The owner wants to evaluate the option of outsourcing all of its new auto warranty service work to Winslow, Inc., a private repair service that works on any make and year car. Either a 5-year contract basis or 10-year license agreement is available from Winslow. Revenue from the manufacturer will be shared with no added cost incurred by the car/ warranty owner. Alternatively, Harmony can continue to do warranty work in-house for the foreseeable future. Use the estimates made by the Harmony owner to perform an annual worth evaluation at 10% per year to select the best option. Monetary values are in $ million units. Contract License In-house First cost, $ 0 −2 −20 Annual cost, $ per year −1 −0.2 −4 Annual revenue, $ per year 2.5 1.3 8 Life, years 5 10 ∞