Question 2 "To deal with a given risk, a network administrator chooses to mitigate it. What does this exactly mean ?" It means that the administrator will take preventive or proactive measures to reduce or minimize the risk. It means that the administrator will do nothing regarding the risk. It means that the administrator will charge a third party (another company) to take care of the risk instead of him. O It means that the administrator will accept the risk.

Question 2 "To deal with a given risk, a network administrator chooses to mitigate it. What does this exactly mean ?" It means that the administrator will take preventive or proactive measures to reduce or minimize the risk. It means that the administrator will do nothing regarding the risk. It means that the administrator will charge a third party (another company) to take care of the risk instead of him. O It means that the administrator will accept the risk.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A Network Security Design is necessary to strengthen protection and security since servers on a flat network handle the majority of the company's business processes. This is the case because the network is flat. Whenever and whenever a demilitarized zone is established. In what ways would you change the structure of the network that is currently in place?
Risk is defined differently in network/OS environments. Is there any evidence of potential danger that you can give?
A Network Security Design is necessary to strengthen protection and security since servers on a flat network conduct most of the company's commercial processes. When and if a demilitarized zone is established. If you could change anything about the present network setup, what would it be?
When it comes to the protection and safety of a network, a vulnerability assessment is absolutely necessary.
The following illustrations show how a suggested scheme may be of aid in the process of designing and carrying out the implementation of a security apparatus. What exactly are we referring to when we speak about network security regulation, and how does the system really function? Who inside the company has to take the responsibility for making the essential preparations, and how can they do so?
Computer Science Find pen-testing technical mistakes in this scenario? Company XYZ recently conduct a security audit by the internal auditor, after finishing the security audit, the company decided to use one of its staff to test an external pen testing and the company provided him all information regarding their network vulnerabilities, He chose Black box testing methodology but the company has a very tight budget and also allowing very short time to run the test. IT staff decided to start pen-testing at the very early stage without the company’s permission and shut all unused ports in the company. After that, he decided to test an application tester in the live network to find all vulnerabilities. He used dynamic testing to monitor system memory.
Network/OS-only environments define "risk" differently. Are there any specific dangers?
Information Security Case: A client of yours is concerned about the external intrusion on their corporate network, and those inside their environment that they seek to fire! They've heard about firewalls and they need your professional opinion as to whether, with the implementation of firewalls, they can feel 100% secure. Still, on their quest to maintain a secure environment, especially with much concern on external attacks, they would like to understand what Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) and Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) are about Q : With implementation of firewalls, can they feel 100% secure? provide the reason(s) why?
SCENARIO 1: You have just completed a routine security audit on the company’s information systems, and you found several areas of vulnerability. For example, file permissions have not been updated in some time, no comprehensive password policy exists, and network traffic is not fully encrypted. You noted these areas, among others, in a report to your supervisor. The report included specific recommendations to fix the problems. Your supervisor responded by saying that budgets are tight right now, and she could not approve your requests to resolve these issues. As an IT professional, you are very uncomfortable with the risk level, but you have been unable to sway your supervisor. When you discussed the situation with a colleague, he said, “Why worry about it? If it’s good enough for her, it should be good enough for you.” What do you think of your colleague’s advice, and why? Is this an ethical question? If you are still is uncomfortable, what are your options? SCENARIO 2: You work for a…
The concept of risk is defined differently by different network/OS systems. Can you provide any specific examples of potential danger?
One method of protecting a network from attack is to block all incoming traffic; however, is this a realistic solution? Consider the challenges of managing a network in a variety of various kinds of companies (a bank, a university, and others). Is this the most effective method of protecting the organization's network against attack? Why is this so, and why isn't it?
Network/OS-only circumstances define "risk" differently. What should we watch for?