Please help me with the conclusion,In a paragraph of 150 words state the "best" option(s), and explain how a true Kantian would come to this conclusion. Describe the results of applyingUniversality and Respect-for-Persons. The main ethical issue:Mario is disregarding the new policy against giving free samples to customers, which wasimplemented by grocery Store owners:What should Anthony to do Mario's action?Options:1. Anthony could report Mario's action to his supervisor or Peloni family.2. Anthony could try to convince Mario to stop giving free samples.3. Anthony could ignore Mario action and not report them.4. Anthony could talk to Peloni family about the policy and the potential benefits of offeringfree samples.Apply Categorical Imperative/Universality:1. Anthony could report Mario's action to his supervisor or Peloni family. Would I wantall people, consistently and universally, to report others who break rules orpolicies? Yes. Reporting rule-breakers promotes fairness and equality for all andensures that everyone is held accountable for their actions.X could report Mario's action to his supervisor or Pelopi,family.-Would I want all people, consistently and universally, to report the actions ofothers that violate established policies or rules? Yes.Rationale: Reporting violations of policies or rules is necessary to ensure fairnessand maintain order. If everyone disregarded rules and policies, chaos wouldensue.2. Anthony could try to convince Mario to stop giving free samples. Would I want allpeople, consistently and universally, to try to persuade rule-breakers to comply withpolicies? Yes. Persuasion is a peaceful and non-coercive way to promote adherence torules and can help maintain order and fairness.X could try to convince Mario to stop giving free samples.- Would I want all people, consistently and universally, to try to persuade others tocomply with established policies or rules? Yes.Rationale: Persuasion is a respectful way to encourage compliance withoutresorting to punitive measures. It also promotes dialogue and understanding.3. Anthony could ignore Mario's actions and not report them. Would I want all people,consistently and universally, to turn a blind eye to rule-breaking? No. Ignoring rule-breaking can create a culture of impunity and undermine the effectiveness of policiesand can be unfair to those who do follow the rules.X could ignore Mario's actions and not report them.Would I want all people, consistently and universally, to ignore violations ofestablished policies or rules? No.Rationale: Ignoring violations of policies or rules undermines the authority andlegitimacy of those policies or rules. It also creates an unfair advantage for thosewho violate them.4. Anthony could talk to the Peloni, family about the policy and the potential benefits ofoffering free samples. Would I want all people, consistently and universally, toadvocate for changes to policies that they disagree with? Yes. Advocacy can be aneffective way to promote changes that can benefit individuals and communities if it isdone peacefully and respectfully.X could talk to the Peloni family about the policy and the potential benefits ofoffering free samples.Would I want all people, consistently and universally, to engage in constructivedialogue about policies or rules? Yes.Rationale: Engaging in dialogue promotes understanding and cooperation and canlead to positive changes.Applying Respect:None of the options listed involve using someone for personal gain, so none of theminvolve exploitation. Conclusion - Ifwere a Kantian she couldReminder - the option or combination of options you choose must pass both tests.

Question

Please help me with the conclusion,In a paragraph of 150 words state the &#34;best&#34; option(s), and explain how a true Kantian would come to this conclusion. Describe the results of applyingUniversality and Respect-for-Persons. The main ethical issue:Mario is disregarding the new policy against giving free samples to customers, which wasimplemented by grocery Store owners:What should Anthony to do Mario's action?Options:1. Anthony could report Mario's action to his supervisor or Peloni family.2. Anthony could try to convince Mario to stop giving free samples.3. Anthony could ignore Mario action and not report them.4. Anthony could talk to Peloni family about the policy and the potential benefits of offeringfree samples.Apply Categorical Imperative/Universality:1. Anthony could report Mario's action to his supervisor or Peloni family. Would I wantall people, consistently and universally, to report others who break rules orpolicies? Yes. Reporting rule-breakers promotes fairness and equality for all andensures that everyone is held accountable for their actions.X could report Mario's action to his supervisor or Pelopi,family.-Would I want all people, consistently and universally, to report the actions ofothers that violate established policies or rules? Yes.Rationale: Reporting violations of policies or rules is necessary to ensure fairnessand maintain order. If everyone disregarded rules and policies, chaos wouldensue.2. Anthony could try to convince Mario to stop giving free samples. Would I want allpeople, consistently and universally, to try to persuade rule-breakers to comply withpolicies? Yes. Persuasion is a peaceful and non-coercive way to promote adherence torules and can help maintain order and fairness.X could try to convince Mario to stop giving free samples.- Would I want all people, consistently and universally, to try to persuade others tocomply with established policies or rules? Yes.Rationale: Persuasion is a respectful way to encourage compliance withoutresorting to punitive measures. It also promotes dialogue and understanding.3. Anthony could ignore Mario's actions and not report them. Would I want all people,consistently and universally, to turn a blind eye to rule-breaking? No. Ignoring rule-breaking can create a culture of impunity and undermine the effectiveness of policiesand can be unfair to those who do follow the rules.X could ignore Mario's actions and not report them.Would I want all people, consistently and universally, to ignore violations ofestablished policies or rules? No.Rationale: Ignoring violations of policies or rules undermines the authority andlegitimacy of those policies or rules. It also creates an unfair advantage for thosewho violate them.4. Anthony could talk to the Peloni, family about the policy and the potential benefits ofoffering free samples. Would I want all people, consistently and universally, toadvocate for changes to policies that they disagree with? Yes. Advocacy can be aneffective way to promote changes that can benefit individuals and communities if it isdone peacefully and respectfully.X could talk to the Peloni family about the policy and the potential benefits ofoffering free samples.Would I want all people, consistently and universally, to engage in constructivedialogue about policies or rules? Yes.Rationale: Engaging in dialogue promotes understanding and cooperation and canlead to positive changes.Applying Respect:None of the options listed involve using someone for personal gain, so none of theminvolve exploitation. Conclusion - Ifwere a Kantian she couldReminder - the option or combination of options you choose must pass both tests.

Accepted Answer

Meaning:-
Based on the application of the categorial imperative/universality and…

Please help me with the conclusion, In a paragraph of 150 words state the "best" option(s), and explain how a true Kantian would come to this conclusion. Describe the results of applying Universality and Respect-for-Persons