Paul and Marie Weir moved from a community property state to a common law property state last year. Shortly before their move, Paul used funds from the family bank account to purchase an airplane solely in his name. After they moved, Paul sold the residence that they had acquired during their marriage and used those funds to purchase a new residence of an equivalent value solely in his own name. Paul and Marie entered into a spousal agreement specifying that all household furnishings belong to Marie and the airplane belongs to Paul. Last month, Paul died. What are the estate planning implications of the Weirs' move from the community property state to a common law property state?

Paul and Marie Weir moved from a community property state to a common law property state last year. Shortly before their move, Paul used funds from the family bank account to purchase an airplane solely in his name. After they moved, Paul sold the residence that they had acquired during their marriage and used those funds to purchase a new residence of an equivalent value solely in his own name. Paul and Marie entered into a spousal agreement specifying that all household furnishings belong to Marie and the airplane belongs to Paul. Last month, Paul died. What are the estate planning implications of the Weirs' move from the community property state to a common law property state?

CONCEPTS IN FED.TAX.,2020-W/ACCESS

20th Edition

ISBN:9780357110362

Author:Murphy

Publisher:Murphy

Chapter12: Nonrecognition Transactions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 40P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Paul and Marie Weir moved from a community property state to a common law property state last year. Shortly before their move, Paul used funds from the family bank account to purchase an airplane solely in his name. After they moved, Paul sold the residence that they had acquired during their marriage and used those funds to purchase a new residence of an equivalent value solely in his own name. Paul and Marie entered into a spousal agreement specifying that all household furnishings belong to Marie and the airplane belongs to Paul. Last month, Paul died. What are the estate planning implications of the Weirs' move from the community property state to a common law property state? A)The airplane was never considered to be community property. B)The new residence is still considered to be community property. C)All of their assets remain community property because spousal agreements are invalid in community property states. D)The ownership interests in all of the property are…
Jack and Liz live in a community-property state and their vacation home is community property. This year they transferred the vacation home to an irrevocable trust that provides their son, Tom, a life estate in the home and the remainder to their daughter, Laura. Under the terms of the trust, Tom has the right to use the vacation home for the duration of his life, and Laura will automatically own the property after Tom's death. At the time of the gift, the home was valued at $500,000, Tom was 35 years old, and the 57520 rate was 5.4 percent. Use discount tables Exhibit 25-4, Required: a. What is the amount, if any, of the taxable gifts? b. Would your answer be different if the home was not community property and Jack and Liz elected to gift-spilt? Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Required A Required B What is the amount, if any, of the taxable gifts? Taxable gift to Laura by each Trocable gift to Tom by each Amount $ 33,520 $ 27,000 Required>
Bill and Ana were married on June 10, 1997. They have lived in California all their married life. Ana filed for divorce on December 1, 2019. Bill moved out of the house they owned jointly on May 10, 2021, but they continued with marriage counseling for several months which eventually failed. Their divorce was finalized on November 10, 2021. Under community property rules when did their community rights over joint assets end? OA) June 10, 1997. C) November 10, 2021. B) May 10, 2021. D) December 1, 2019.
Mel and Susan Carter are working with an estate planner for disposition of their property during life and at death. For their personal residence in Los Angeles, they wish to live in the residence for their life and then transfer the property to their two children, Ron T. Carter and Diane L. Carter, as remaindermen at the date of death of the latest surviving spouse. The interest in their residence is transferred as follows: "To Mel Carter and Susan Carter for life, then to Ron T. Carter and Diane L. Carter." What type of ownership interest will Ron Carter and Diane Carter have after this change in the title? Life estate Fee simple absolute Remainder Conditional estate
Dick and Karen are married and live in a community property state. All of their property is also located in this state, except for an undeveloped parcel of land left to Dick by his uncle in a common law state. Dick and Karen have three minor children. Dick and Karen both have wills that leave everything to the survivor, and if there is no survivor, then to the children equally. Each will appoints the other spouse as personal representative (PR). Dick's brother was appointed as guardian of the minor children. Dick's brother has since died. After analyzing Dick and Karen's current estate plan for weaknesses, which one of the following statements is NOT correct? A) Their estates may be subject to their state intestacy statutes to appoint a PR in the event of simultaneous death. B) A guardianship and/or conservatorship proceeding will be necessary for the minor children. C) Dick's estate will require an ancillary probate proceeding. D) The wills are irrelevant…
Bert Baker and Ernestine Moffet were never formally married but have lived together as husband and wife for the last 14 years. Bert and Ernestine reside in Washington, D.C., a jurisdiction that recognizes common law marriages as valid. Consequently, they filed both a joint district income tax return and a joint federal income tax return for the last eight years. Bert and Ernestine are planning to move their household to Frederick, Maryland, and become permanent residents of that state. Maryland doesn’t recognize common law marriages. Will Bert and Ernestine’s change in residence allow them to avoid the marriage penalty by filing as single individuals?
John and Marsha are married and live in AZ. They do not have a prenuptual agreement. There house is titled as community property. They purchased their house after marriage for $300,000. John died this year and the value of the house at the date of death was $481,486. What is Marsha's tax basis in the house?.
Gus (age 84) and Belle (age 18) are married early in the year. Late in the same year, Belle confronts Gus about his failure to transfer to her the considerable amount of property he previously promised. Gus reassures Belle that she will receive the property when he dies. Because the transfer occurs at death, the estate tax martial deduction will avoid any Federal transfer taxes at the time. Comment on the issues involved and any misconceptions Gus may have.
Judy’s mother, Sarah, died on July 2, 2018, leaving Judy her entire estate. Included in the estate was Sarah’s residence. Sarah’s basis in the residence was $30,000. The fair market value of the residence on July 2, 2018, was $155,000. The property was distributed to Judy on January 1, 2018. The Vances have held the property as a rental property and have managed it themselves and they started renting the house to the same tenant starting January 1, 2019. To compute depreciation on the house, the Vances had allocated $15,000 of the property’s basis to the land on which the house is located. The Vances collected rent of $1,000 a month during the months the house was rented during the year. They incurred the following related expenses during this period: Property insurance$500, Property taxes $800, Maintenance$465. Tax return 2019, how to compute rental home income.