Nike and Adidas face the following coordination problem in trying to decide whether to conduct heavy or light combative advertising against the other firm. Adidas Light Ads Heavy Ads Nike Light Ads $20 M, $24 M $10 M, $8 M Heavy Ads $8 M, $12 M $16 M, $18 M Assuming that both companies announce their strategies simultaneously, which of the following set of strategies are Nash equilibrium? Check all that apply. O {Light Ads with Probability = 0.5909, Light Ads with Probability = 0.6222} O {Light Ads A, Heavy Ads N} O {Light Ads with Probability = 0.4545, Light Ads with Probability = 0.4444} A {Heavy Ads A, Light Ads N} O {Light Ads A, Light Ads N} O {Heavy Ads, Heavy AdsN}

Nike and Adidas face the following coordination problem in trying to decide whether to conduct heavy or light combative advertising against the other firm. Adidas Light Ads Heavy Ads Nike Light Ads $20 M, $24 M $10 M, $8 M Heavy Ads $8 M, $12 M $16 M, $18 M Assuming that both companies announce their strategies simultaneously, which of the following set of strategies are Nash equilibrium? Check all that apply. O {Light Ads with Probability = 0.5909, Light Ads with Probability = 0.6222} O {Light Ads A, Heavy Ads N} O {Light Ads with Probability = 0.4545, Light Ads with Probability = 0.4444} A {Heavy Ads A, Light Ads N} O {Light Ads A, Light Ads N} O {Heavy Ads, Heavy AdsN}

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter15: Imperfect Competition

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 15.8P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

II.2 Companies A and B can compete on advertising or R&D. The profits (in millions of $ million) of the two firms are given in the table below assumig that they play a one-shot simultancous mov game (the profit or firm A is listed first in every cell of the matrix, followed by the profit of firm B): Advertising R&D 50, 25 10, 70 20, 40 60, 35 1. Find the mixed strategy equilibrium. A\B Advertising R&D 2. What are the expected profits for both firms in this equilibrium?
Budweiser Medium High 90, 70 60, 50 Low 120, 90 100, 70 Low 115, 100 Miller Medium 130, 60 High 90, 20 120, 40 100, 80 Numbers in each cell are profits from the size of an advertising budget- Miller first (in bold), then Budweiser. Two beer companies face the payoff table above for choosing an advertising budget. Does this decision problem have a Nash equilibrium? If so, what is it? Select one: O a. Yes. Low for Miller , Low for Budweiser. O b. No. There is no Nash equilibrium. O c. Yes. Low for Miller, Medium for Budweiser. O d. Yes. High for Miller, High for Budweiser.
Is this strategy a sub-game perfect Nash Equilibrium? Player 2: a c e Player 1: A DE C 2 True False A d B e a 2 1 2 1 A D E חח 0 0 1 F -1 1000
◄ Search 12:47 PM Sun Nov 12 ← Note Nov 12, 2023 Uptown's price strategy The Nash equilibrium occurs when High Low LED RareAir's price strategy High $12 $15 The more favorable outcome would be for $12 Tt ✪ $6 B Low $6 D $8. $15 $8 S O both firms have an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the dominant strategy of cell A. 92% neither firm has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the dominant strategy of cell D. O one firm consistently has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the high-price strategy of cell B. O one firm consistently has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the high-price strategy of cell C. O the firms to collude and use the high-price strategy but this strategy requires cooperation. O one firm to take the lead and let the…
Little Kona is a small coffee company that is considering entering a market dominated by Big Brew. Each company's profit depends on whether Little Kona enters and whether Big Brew sets a high price or a low price: True or False: Only Little Kona has a dominant strategy in this game. True or False Which of the following outcomes represent a Nash equilibrium in this case? Check all that apply. Big Brew maintains a high price and Little Kona enters. a.Big Brew maintains a low price and Little Kona enters. b.Big Brew maintains a high price and Little Kona does not enter. c.Big Brew maintains a low price and Little Kona does not enter. Big Brew threatens Little Kona by saying, “If you enter, we're going to set a low price, so you had better stay out.” True or False: Little Kona should not believe the threat. True or False If the two firms could collude and agree on how to split the total profits, what outcome would they…
Please look at the payoff matrix below which shows the benefits that would accrue to each player in a 2-player.non-sequential, non-repeated game. a) Identify the collusive (cooperative) equilibrium. b) Identify the secure strategy (maximin) equilibrium c) Identify the maximax equilibrium d) Identify the Nash equilibrium Apple Inc. Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3 20 40 60 60 1000 200 Strategy A 70 50 90 Banana Inc. 400 70 300 Strategy B 40 80 100 90 150 80 Strategy C
Consider the following game: ● ● U P1 M D P2 C R L 1, 24, 36, 5 1,5 2,7 4, 3 2, 43, 25, 2 Identify the undominated strategies of P1 and P2. Which strategies are rationalizable? Find all the Nash equilibrium of this game. Illustrate your answer by a clearly labelled best response graph, with P1's strategy on the x-axis and P2's strategy on the y-axis.
4. Suppose in 1977 Honda and Toyota each have to decide whether to build an automobile plant in the North American market. The payoff matrix below shows Honda's payoff on the left, and Toyota's on the right. Is there a Nash equilibrium? If so, where, and how do you know? Тoyota Build small Don't build anything plant Build small 16, 16 20, 15 Honda plant Don't build anything 15, 20 18, 18
12. To advertise or not to advertise Suppose that two firms, Hatte Latte and Bean Bruuer, are the only sellers of espresso in some hypothetical market. The following payoff matrix gives the profit (in millions of dollars) earned by each company depending on whether or not it chooses to advertise: Bean Bruuer Advertise Doesn't Advertise Advertise Hatte Latte Doesn't Advertise 9,9 3,15 15,3 11, 11 For example, the lower left cell of the matrix shows that if Bean Bruuer advertises and Hatte Latte does not advertise, Bean Bruuer will make a profit of $15 million, and Hatte Latte will make a profit of $3 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Hatte Latte and Bean Bruuer are both profit-maximizing firms. If Hatte Latte chooses to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ does not advertise. million if Bean Bruuer advertises and a profit of $ million if Bean Bruuer If Hatte Latte chooses not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ does not advertise. million if Bean Bruuer…
The world has changed a bit. Microsoft and Google could still either cooperate or compete in the market for social media video software currently captured by Tik Tok, but their payoffs have changed. The table below shows their profits in billions of USD in each scenario. Use your mouse to point and click on the Nash equilibrium outcome(s). [There may be more than one so make sure you work out all the best response strategies]. Microsoft Cooperate 3,3 4,0 Cooperate O Don't cooperate O Google Don't cooperate O O 0,4 1,1
16. Boeing is considering whether it should develop its next aircraft with a wide body (WIDE) or whether it should make it a long aeroplane (LONG). Airbus, Boeing's competitor, also has a choice between choosing WIDE or LONG. The payoffs to the two companies are shown in the payoff matrix below. What are the (pure strategy) Nash equilibrium in this game? (The first action in the brackets is the strategy of Boeing, while the second is Airbus's strategy.) Airbus WIDE LONG WIDE 40 for Airbus Boeing 50 for Boeing O for Airbus 0 for Boeing LONG 0 for Airbus 0 for Boeing 50 for Airbus 40 for Boeing a. (WIDE, WIDE) for Boeing and Airbus respectively) and (WIDE, LONG) b. (LONG, WIDE) and (WIDE, LONG) c. (WIDE, WIDE) d. (LONG, LONG) e. (WIDE, WIDE) and (LONG, LONG)
Exercise A.2 . Sinergy and Dinaco are the only two companies in a high-tech industry. They are faced with the following matrix of results when deciding their research budget: After analizing the graph, answer the following questions... a) Does Sinergy have a dominant strategy? Reason your answer. b) Does Dinaco have a dominant strategy? Reason your answer. c) Is there a Nash equilibrium in this scenario? Reason your answer.