It is a good idea to give some thought to the concept of utilizing organized language when discussing processes that are not included in an analysis of systems. This is because structured language facilitates clearer communication. One way to do this is by paying at least some attention to the possibility.

It is a good idea to give some thought to the concept of utilizing organized language when discussing processes that are not included in an analysis of systems. This is because structured language facilitates clearer communication. One way to do this is by paying at least some attention to the possibility.

C++ for Engineers and Scientists

4th Edition

ISBN:9781133187844

Author:Bronson, Gary J.

Publisher:Bronson, Gary J.

Chapter12: Adding Functionality To Your Classes

Section12.4: Class Inheritance And Polymorphism

Problem 3E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Question 17. Due to reusability the overall cost of design, code and testing gets reduced. It also reduces the amount of code and therefore the code becomes understandable.Reusability is possible in conventional language but in object oriented languages reusability can be done effectively.What are the types of reusability explain briefly?
Structured language should be used for explaining methods that do not need systems analysis.
Object-oriented design should be used in contexts where it makes sense to do so. When the conditions warrant it, the use of structured design is the option that should be used. Why is anything even somewhat similar happening, etc.
vWhen comparing an encapsulated object to a message object, the focus of an OO language will be on the former.
No need wrong Answer & wrong Explanation...@ will downvote Show that the language is not context free
Object-oriented design should be utilized in all appropriate contexts. Structured design is a viable choice to consider when the situation calls for it. whether there are any potential explanations for this, what they might be, etc.
It is possible that using structured language is beneficial when discussing processes that are not a part of an investigation into systems. This is something that should be considered. It is not possible to rule out the existence of this option.
Imperative languages like Fortran and C are typically compiled, while scripting languages, in which many issues cannot be settled until run time, are typically interpreted. Is interpretation simply what one “has to do ”when compilation is infeasible, or are there actually some advantages to interpreting a language, even when a compiler is available?
It's helpful to discuss non-systems analytical techniques using structured language.
When applicable, object-oriented design should be used. When the situation calls for it, structured design is an acceptable option. Why does anything similar occur, etc.?
In the realm of computer programming, what is the distinction between cohesion and coupling?
Please elaborate on the meaning of "portability" in the context of different programming languages.