Solve all questions compulsory.... International Trade - End of Chapter ProblemThe United States is highly protective of its agricultural food industry, imposing import tariffs and sometimes quotas onimports of agricultural goods. This chapter presented three arguments for trade protection. For each argument, discusswhether it is a valid justification for trade protection of U.S. agricultural products.ValidThe United States would be vulnerable if all of its food came fromoverseas, so trade protections are necessary for it to maintain nationalsecurity.IncorrectInvalidThe United States has traditionally been a manufacturing economy andrecently moved more resources into the agricultural sector. Because theagricultural sector is relatively new, it requires protection as an infantindustry.Since the agricultural sector employs a large percentage of the laborforce, protection is necessary to prevent job loss.Answer Bank

The issue of trade protection for U.S. agricultural products is complex, with arguments on both…

International Trade - End of Chapter Problem The United States is highly protective of its agricultural food industry, imposing import tariffs and sometimes quotas on imports of agricultural goods. This chapter presented three arguments for trade protection. For each argument, discuss whether it is a valid justification for trade protection of U.S. agricultural products.

International Trade - End of Chapter Problem The United States is highly protective of its agricultural food industry, imposing import tariffs and sometimes quotas on imports of agricultural goods. This chapter presented three arguments for trade protection. For each argument, discuss whether it is a valid justification for trade protection of U.S. agricultural products.

Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)

7th Edition

ISBN:9781285165912

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter9: Application: International Trade

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QCMC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Trade has income distribution effects. For example, suppose that because of a government-negotiated reduction in trade barriers, trade between Germany and the Czech Republic increases. Germany sells house paint to the Czech Republic. The Czech Republic sells alarm clocks to Germany. Would you expect this pattern of trade to increase or decrease jobs and wages in the paint industry in Germany? The alarm clock industry in Germany? The paint industry in Czech Republic? The alarm clock industry in Czech Republic? What has to happen for there to be no increase in total unemployment in both countries?
Assume two countries, Thailand (T) and Japan (J), have one good: cameras. The demand (d) and supply (s) for cameras In Thailand and Japan is described by the following functions: QsT=-5+14P QsJ=-10+14P QdT=60-P QdJ=80-P P is the price measured in a common currency used in both countries, such as the Thai Baht. Compute the equilibrium price (P) and quantities in each country without trade. Now assume that free trade occurs. The free-trade price goes to 56.36 Baht. Who exports and Imports cameras and in what quantities?
Why might Belgium, France, Italy, and Sweden have a higher export to GDP ratio than the United States?
Are the gains from international trade more likely to be relatively more important to large or small countries?
Suppose that Congress imposes a tariff on importedautomobiles to protect the U.S. auto industry fromforeign competition. Assuming that the United Statesis a price taker in the world auto market, show thefollowing on a diagram: the change in the quantityof imports, the loss to U.S. consumers, the gainto U.S. manufacturers, government revenue, andthe deadweight loss associated with the tariff. Theloss to consumers can be decomposed into threepieces: a gain to domestic producers, revenue forthe government, and a deadweight loss. Use yourdiagram to identify these three pieces.
5. You have been asked to quantify the effects of removing a country's tariff on sugar. The ompute its value? nard part of the work is already done: Somebody has estimated how many pouncs Sugar would be produced, consumed, and imported by the country if there were no saber duty. You are given the information shown in the table. Estimated Situation without Tariff Situation with Import Tariff World price $0.10 per pound $0.10 per pound $0.02 per pound $0.12 per pound Tariff $0.10 per pound Domestic price Domestic consumption (billions of pounds per year) Domestic production (billions of pounds per year) Imports (billions of pounds per year) 22 20 8. 16 12 Calculate the following measures: a. The domestic consumers' gain from removing the tariff. b. The domestic producers' loss from removing the tariff. C. The government tariff revenue loss. d. The net effect on national well-being.
QUESTIONS : D. Would you agree if the UK imposed import protection for wheat and corn to protect domestic wheat and corn farmers? Give reasons and basis for your argument. What are the negative and positive impacts that will be faced by the UK when implementing this protection policy (Give at least 5 answers for each positive & negative impact). POINT D ANSWER : Would defeinetly not go with the idea and not accept the trade proctectionsim, as it of more harm than good. Reasons are as follow: -The restricted options of customers and paying more for products and services. A main consequence of trade protectionism would be that, as there can be limits on how much can be imported, buyers may have a restricted variety of products and services. Shoppers would have a very limited option as to the amount, standard and form of product that might otherwise be available to them without competitive protection due to these quotas. -Exchange rate caps have induced long-term inflation because…
Assume, for Vietnam, that the domestic price of textiles without international trade is lower than the world price of textiles. This suggests that, in the production of textiles, O Vietnam has a comparative advantage over other countries and Vietnam will export textiles. O other countries have a comparative advantage over Vietnam and Vietnam will export textiles. O other countries have a comparative advantage over Vietnam and Vietnam will import textiles. O Vietnam has a comparative advantage over other countries and Vietnam will import textiles. MacBook A esc D00 FA F1 F2 F3 FS % 4 Q W E R T tab I A S D F G s lock
What are non-tariff barriers? List and explain 3 examples of non-tariff barriersimposed by the U.S., why they were implemented, andtheir impact on the U.S. and other countries. All trade barriers are suddenly eliminated! Explainwhat would happen to employment, national income,and GDP in America, and why those things wouldhappen?
Sometimes governments use the 'national security' argument to justify protecting an industry with tariffs. (Choose the best answer) O Stockpiling the product is a plausible alternative to ensure national security interests without risking a trade war. O An export subsidy would always be the first best option Most countries are much weaker than the USA and therfore would never retaliate. O This argument is always plausible since tarrifs are the best way to ensure the industry is able to survive.
Which of the following are potentially valid arguments for tariffs or export subsi- dies, and which are not? Explain your answers. a. “Dairy producer earning in Wales are at their lowest peak despite an overallrise in farm business incomes.” b. “ThemoreecologicallycertifiedfoodsEuropeanUnionrequires,thehighertheprice of these products will be on common market.” c. “US soybean exports to China and India don’t just mean increased wealth forfarmers – they mean increased wealth for everyone in the value chain.” d. “ThePETindustrycontinuedtosustainU.S.recyclingprograms;thisshowsthe strength of the PET recycling market in the face of significant global economicslowdown and a drop in virgin feedstock prices.” e. “The price of coal has been stable, but the production dropped 10.3 percent, and workers have been forced to look for other jobs.”
Consider the arguments for restricting trade.a. Imagine that you are a lobbyist for timber, anestablished industry suffering from low-pricedforeign competition, and you are trying to getCongress to pass trade restrictions. Which twoor three of the five arguments discussed in thechapter do you think would be most persuasiveto the average member of Congress? Explain yourreasoning.b. Now assume you are an astute student ofeconomics (not a hard assumption, we hope).Although all the arguments for restricting tradehave their shortcomings, name the two or threearguments that seem to make the most economicsense to you. For each, describe the economicrationale for and against these arguments for traderestrictions.