Imagine the GDP per capita of a country doubles every one hundred years. What would the shape of a linear-scale graph and a ratio-scale graph be? Select one or more: a. Linear scale: an upward-sloping curve with increasing slope (called convex shape) Ratio scale: an upward-sloping straight line b. Linear scale: an upward-sloping straight line Ratio scale: a straight horizontal line c. Linear scale: an upward-sloping straight line Ratio scale: an upward-sloping curve with decreasing slope (called concave shape) d. Linear scale: an upward-sloping convex curve Ratio scale: an upward-sloping convex curve

Imagine the GDP per capita of a country doubles every one hundred years. What would the shape of a linear-scale graph and a ratio-scale graph be? Select one or more: a. Linear scale: an upward-sloping curve with increasing slope (called convex shape) Ratio scale: an upward-sloping straight line b. Linear scale: an upward-sloping straight line Ratio scale: a straight horizontal line c. Linear scale: an upward-sloping straight line Ratio scale: an upward-sloping curve with decreasing slope (called concave shape) d. Linear scale: an upward-sloping convex curve Ratio scale: an upward-sloping convex curve

Macroeconomics

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617390

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

ChapterA: Working With Diagrams

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8QP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

If the GDP per capita of a country doubles every one hundred years, the shape of its graph on a linear scale graph and a ratio scale graph are: Linear scale graph Ratio scale graph An upward-sloping curve with (a) increasing slope (called convex An upward-sloping straight line shape) (b) An upward-sloping straight line A straight horizontal line An upward-sloping curve with (c) | An upward-sloping straight line decreasing slope (called concave shape) An upward-sloping convex (d) An upward-sloping convex curve curve Select one: а. а) O b. b) С. с) O d. d)
The following table lists GDP per capita from 1970 to 2010 for South Korea and the United States. As you can see, both grew substantially over that 40-year period. Plot the five data points for each country on a graph using a nonproportional scale, as in Exhibit 7.3 in the chapter. Connect the points to create a line graph. Plot the five data points for each country on a graph using a proportional scale, that is, a scale where equal distances represent equal percentage changes. Connect the points to create a line graph. Interpret the differences you see in the two graphs.
The following is the graph of the natural log of UK real GDP per capita between 1875 and 2014: Based on this information, which of the following statements is correct? Log of real GDP per capita 11.0 10.5 10.0 9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 -068T ა c Year Show Transcribed Text y-0.0156x 7.7734 R-0.9445 (A) The graph shows that real GDP per capita in the UK in 1955 was about £8,000. (B) The slope of the best-fit straight line is the average annual growth rate. (C) The graph shows that the average growth rate was lower in the decades after 1921 than in the decades before 1918. (D) The graph of real GDP per capita plotted using a ratio scale would look very different to the graph above.
12. The GDP per capita of the United States is equal to $28 020 and that of Chile is equal to $4860. a. Draw a graph with logarithmic scale that shows the GDP per capita of the United States and Chile. b. On the graph from question a., draw horizontal lines corresponding to a GDP per capita of $5, $50, $500, $5000 and $50 000. What do you notice? Explain!
Briefly explain the use of graphs as a way to represent economic relationships. What is an inverse relationship? How does it graph? What is a direct relationship? How does it graph? Graph and explain the relationships (other things equal) you would expect to find between (a) the number of inches of rainfall per month and the sale of umbrellas, (b) the price of bottled water and the number of bottles sold per year, and (c) the popularity of an entertainer and the price of her concert tickets. In each case cite and explain how variables other than those specifically mentioned might upset the expected relationship. Is your graph in part b, above, consistent with the fact that, historically, the quantity and price of bottled water have both increased? If not, explain any difference.
Briefly explain the use of graphs as a way to represent economic relationships. What is an inverse relationship? How does it graph? What is a direct relationship? How does it graph? Graph and explain the relationships you would expect to find between ( a ) the number of inches of rainfall per month and the sale of umbrellas, ( b) the amount of tuition and the level of enrollment at a university, and (c ) the popularity of an entertainer and the price of her concert tickets. In each case cite and explain how variables other than those specififi cally mentioned might upset the expected relationship. Is your graph in previous part b consistent with the fact that, historically, enrollments and tuition have both increased? If not, explain any difference.
Using the following data, calculate productivity: GDP = 100 billion Employment = 1 million %3D Annual hours worked per worker = 2,000
Using Excel: Please prove Ernst Engel's law by using Lao data ( the share of agricultural productsin the GDP of Laos) from 2000-2020 to draw a figure. Note: please write the data source
Examine the relationship between the two countries base on the graph and table provided.
Can you give the relative size of each of the components? (in absolute dollars and as a percentage of GDP) for the year 2023 Q2' Please and thank you
In economics graphs are useful as they express visually and display numbers; equations formulas; relations equations; statistics and data
Using the data in the table below related to nominal GDP, real GDP, and total population, answer the questions for the time period 2010-2019: Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Nominal GDP (in Millions) $9,817,000 10,128,000 10,469,000 10,960,000 11,685,000 12,422,000 13,178,000 13,808,000 14,291,000 13,939,000 14,524,000 15,518,000 16,163,000 16,768,000 17,393,000 18,037,000 18,954,000 19,543,000 20,612,000 21,433,000 For 2019: Nominal GDP per capita = $ Real GDP per capita = $ Real GDP (in Millions) (2012 Base Year) % $13,131,000 13,262,000 13,493,000 13,879,000 14,406,000 14,913,000 15,338,000 15,626,000 15,605,000 Instructions: In part a, round your responses to the nearest dollar. In parts b and c, enter your responses as a percentage rounded to one decimal place. a. Calculate nominal and real GDP per capita for 2010 and 2019. For 2010: 15,209,000 15,599,000 15,841,000 16,197,000 16,495,000 16,912,000 17,432,000…