Elliot-Cole is a publicly owned international corporation, with operations in over 90 countries. Netincome has been growing at approximately 15 percent per year, and the stock consistently tradesat about 20 times earnings.To attract and retain key management leadership, the company has developed a compensation plan in which managers receive earnings in the form of bonuses as well as opportunities to pur-chase shares of the company’s stock at a reduced price. In general, the higher the company’s net income each year, the greater the benefit to management in terms of their personal compensation. During the current year, political unrest and economic upheaval threatened Elliot-Cole’s busi-ness operations in three foreign countries. At year-end, the company’s auditors insisted that man-agement write off the company’s assets in these countries, stating that these assets were “severely impaired.” Said one corporate official, “We can’t argue with that. Each of these countries is a realtrouble spot. We might be pulling out of these places at any time, and any assets probably wouldjust be left behind.”Management agreed that the carrying value of Elliot-Cole’s assets in these three countries should be reduced to “scrap value”—which was nothing. These write-downs amounted to approxi-mately 18 percent of the company’s income prior to recognition of these losses. (These write-offs are for financial reporting purposes only; they have no effect on the company’s income tax obligations.)At the meeting with the auditors, one of Elliot-Cole’s officers states, “There’s no doubt weshould write these assets off. But of course, this is an extraordinary loss. A loss of this size can’t beconsidered a routine matter.”Instructionsa. Explain the logic behind writing down the book values of assets that are still in operation.b. Evaluate the officer’s statement concerning the classification of these losses. Do you agree thatthey should be classified as an extraordinary item? Explain.c. Explain the effect that the classification of these losses—that is, as ordinary or extraordinary—will have in the current period on Elliot-Cole’s:1. Net income.2. Income before extraordinary items.3. Income from continuing operations.4. Net cash flow from operating activities.d. Explain how the classification of these losses will affect the p/e ratio reported in newspaperssuch as The Wall Street Journal.e. Does management appear to have any self-interest in the classification of these losses?Explain.f. Explain how (if at all) these write-offs are likely to affect the earnings of future periods.g. What “ethical dilemma” confronts management in this case?
Elliot-Cole is a publicly owned international corporation, with operations in over 90 countries. Net
income has been growing at approximately 15 percent per year, and the stock consistently trades
at about 20 times earnings.
To attract and retain key management leadership, the company has developed a compensation
plan in which managers receive earnings in the form of bonuses as well as opportunities to pur-
chase shares of the company’s stock at a reduced price. In general, the higher the company’s net
income each year, the greater the benefit to management in terms of their personal compensation.
During the current year, political unrest and economic upheaval threatened Elliot-Cole’s busi-
ness operations in three foreign countries. At year-end, the company’s auditors insisted that man-
agement write off the company’s assets in these countries, stating that these assets were “severely
impaired.” Said one corporate official, “We can’t argue with that. Each of these countries is a real
trouble spot. We might be pulling out of these places at any time, and any assets probably would
just be left behind.”
Management agreed that the carrying value of Elliot-Cole’s assets in these three countries
should be reduced to “scrap value”—which was nothing. These write-downs amounted to approxi-
mately 18 percent of the company’s income prior to recognition of these losses. (These write-
offs are for financial reporting purposes only; they have no effect on the company’s income tax
obligations.)
At the meeting with the auditors, one of Elliot-Cole’s officers states, “There’s no doubt we
should write these assets off. But of course, this is an extraordinary loss. A loss of this size can’t be
considered a routine matter.”
Instructions
a. Explain the logic behind writing down the book values of assets that are still in operation.
b. Evaluate the officer’s statement concerning the classification of these losses. Do you agree that
they should be classified as an extraordinary item? Explain.
c. Explain the effect that the classification of these losses—that is, as ordinary or extraordinary—
will have in the current period on Elliot-Cole’s:
1. Net income.
2. Income before extraordinary items.
3. Income from continuing operations.
4. Net
d. Explain how the classification of these losses will affect the p/e ratio reported in newspapers
such as The Wall Street Journal.
e. Does management appear to have any self-interest in the classification of these losses?
Explain.
f. Explain how (if at all) these write-offs are likely to affect the earnings of future periods.
g. What “ethical dilemma” confronts management in this case?
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
