December 31 (in millions) Raw materials and work in process Finished goods Unbilled shipments Less revaluation to LIFO 2009 2008 $7,581 $8,710 4,105 5,032 759 561 12,445 14,303 (529) (706) $11,916 $13,597 The company reports its inventories using the LIFO inventory costing method. (a) What is the balance in inventories reported on GE's 2009 balance sheet? $0 (million) (b) What would GE's 2009 balance sheet have reported for inventories had the company used FIFO inventory costing? 50 (million)

Financial Accounting: The Impact on Decision Makers
10th Edition
ISBN:9781305654174
Author:Gary A. Porter, Curtis L. Norton
Publisher:Gary A. Porter, Curtis L. Norton
Chapter5: Inventories And Cost Of Goods Sold
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 5.10MCP: Comparison of Inventory Costing Methods—Periodic System Bitten Companys inventory records show 600...
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question

A-5

December 31 (in millions)
Raw materials and work in process
Finished goods
Unbilled shipments
Less revaluation to LIFO
2009 2008
$7,581 $8,710
4,105 5,032
759 561
12,445 14,303
(529) (706)
$ 11,916 $13,597
The company reports its inventories using the LIFO inventory costing method.
(a) What is the balance in inventories reported on GE's 2009 balance sheet?
$0
(million)
(b) What would GE's 2009 balance sheet have reported for inventories had the company used FIFO inventory costing?
$0
(million)
(c) What cumulative effect has GE's choice of LIFO over FIFO had on its pretax income as of year end 2009?
OThe cumulative effect is that pretax income has not changed. LIFO and FIFO are simply two different ways to account for inventories. Both methods lead to the same pretax income.
OThe cumulative effect on pretax income is nonexistent. The LIFO and FIFO methods of inventory accounting cause only cash flow effects, and they do not affect pretax income.
OThe cumulative effect is that pretax income has decreased. LIFO matches more "current" inventory costs against current selling prices, thus avoiding the recognition of holding gains.
OThe cumulative effect is that pretax income has increased. FIFO matches more "current" inventory costs against current selling prices, thus avoiding the recognition of holding gains.
(d) Assume GE has a 35% income tax rate. As of the 2009 year-end, how much has GE saved in taxes by choosing LIFO over FIFO method for costing inventory? (Round your answer to the nearest whole number.)
SO
(million)
(e) What effect has the use of LIFO inventory costing had on GE's pretax income and tax expense for 2009 only (assume a 35% income tax rate)? (Round answers to the nearest whole number.)
2009 pretax income:
by $ 0
million.
2009 tax expense:
by $ 0
Please answer all parts of the question.
million.
Transcribed Image Text:December 31 (in millions) Raw materials and work in process Finished goods Unbilled shipments Less revaluation to LIFO 2009 2008 $7,581 $8,710 4,105 5,032 759 561 12,445 14,303 (529) (706) $ 11,916 $13,597 The company reports its inventories using the LIFO inventory costing method. (a) What is the balance in inventories reported on GE's 2009 balance sheet? $0 (million) (b) What would GE's 2009 balance sheet have reported for inventories had the company used FIFO inventory costing? $0 (million) (c) What cumulative effect has GE's choice of LIFO over FIFO had on its pretax income as of year end 2009? OThe cumulative effect is that pretax income has not changed. LIFO and FIFO are simply two different ways to account for inventories. Both methods lead to the same pretax income. OThe cumulative effect on pretax income is nonexistent. The LIFO and FIFO methods of inventory accounting cause only cash flow effects, and they do not affect pretax income. OThe cumulative effect is that pretax income has decreased. LIFO matches more "current" inventory costs against current selling prices, thus avoiding the recognition of holding gains. OThe cumulative effect is that pretax income has increased. FIFO matches more "current" inventory costs against current selling prices, thus avoiding the recognition of holding gains. (d) Assume GE has a 35% income tax rate. As of the 2009 year-end, how much has GE saved in taxes by choosing LIFO over FIFO method for costing inventory? (Round your answer to the nearest whole number.) SO (million) (e) What effect has the use of LIFO inventory costing had on GE's pretax income and tax expense for 2009 only (assume a 35% income tax rate)? (Round answers to the nearest whole number.) 2009 pretax income: by $ 0 million. 2009 tax expense: by $ 0 Please answer all parts of the question. million.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Accounting for Merchandise Inventory
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Financial Accounting: The Impact on Decision Make…
Financial Accounting: The Impact on Decision Make…
Accounting
ISBN:
9781305654174
Author:
Gary A. Porter, Curtis L. Norton
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Century 21 Accounting General Journal
Century 21 Accounting General Journal
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337680059
Author:
Gilbertson
Publisher:
Cengage
Financial And Managerial Accounting
Financial And Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337902663
Author:
WARREN, Carl S.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Intermediate Accounting: Reporting And Analysis
Intermediate Accounting: Reporting And Analysis
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337788281
Author:
James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald Pagach
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Cost Accounting
Principles of Cost Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781305087408
Author:
Edward J. Vanderbeck, Maria R. Mitchell
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Accounting Volume 1
Principles of Accounting Volume 1
Accounting
ISBN:
9781947172685
Author:
OpenStax
Publisher:
OpenStax College