D. In many parts of the economy, scientific knowledge is what might be thought of as a general purpose tool. There is old wisdom, still relevant, about the funding of scientific discoveries by individuals and firms. From 1883, in Sidgwick's The Principles of Political Economy, we have the following. scientific discoveries... however ultimately profitable to industry, have not generally speaking a market value: the inventions in which the discovery is applied can be protected by patents; but the extent to which any given discovery will aid invention is mostly so uncertain, that even if the secret of a law of nature could be conveniently kept, it would not be worth an inventor's while to buy it, in the hope of being able to make something of it. [Book II, Ch. III, §3] Beyond this, general purpose knowledge has (at least) two other crucial aspects for economics arguments: first, knowledge regularly has spill-overs, positive externalities, and the firm investing in the research cannot capture all of these; and second, general purpose knowledge may not yield payoff for a much longer time than firms or venture capitalists are willing to plan for even if society is willing to plan for the longer run. 1. Explain how the first factor leads firms to under-invest, from society's point of view, in creating new scientific knowledge. 2. Explain how the second factor leads firms to under-invest, from society's point of view, in creating new scientific knowledge. Your answer should include different discount factors.
D. In many parts of the economy, scientific knowledge is what might be thought of as a general purpose tool. There is old wisdom, still relevant, about the funding of scientific discoveries by individuals and firms. From 1883, in Sidgwick's The Principles of Political Economy, we have the following. scientific discoveries... however ultimately profitable to industry, have not generally speaking a market value: the inventions in which the discovery is applied can be protected by patents; but the extent to which any given discovery will aid invention is mostly so uncertain, that even if the secret of a law of nature could be conveniently kept, it would not be worth an inventor's while to buy it, in the hope of being able to make something of it. [Book II, Ch. III, §3] Beyond this, general purpose knowledge has (at least) two other crucial aspects for economics arguments: first, knowledge regularly has spill-overs, positive externalities, and the firm investing in the research cannot capture all of these; and second, general purpose knowledge may not yield payoff for a much longer time than firms or venture capitalists are willing to plan for even if society is willing to plan for the longer run. 1. Explain how the first factor leads firms to under-invest, from society's point of view, in creating new scientific knowledge. 2. Explain how the second factor leads firms to under-invest, from society's point of view, in creating new scientific knowledge. Your answer should include different discount factors.
Chapter14: Monopoly
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 14.7P
Related questions
Question
Image uploaded answer is not allowed please dear expert
![D. In many parts of the economy, scientific knowledge is what might
be thought of as a general purpose tool. There is old wisdom, still
relevant, about the funding of scientific discoveries by individuals
and firms. From 1883, in Sidgwick's The Principles of Political
Economy, we have the following.
scientific discoveries... however ultimately profitable
to industry, have not generally speaking a market value:
the inventions in which the discovery is applied can be
protected by patents; but the extent to which any given
discovery will aid invention is mostly so uncertain, that
even if the secret of a law of nature could be conveniently
kept, it would not be worth an inventor's while to buy it,
in the hope of being able to make something of it. [Book
II, Ch. III, §3]
Beyond this, general purpose knowledge has (at least) two other
crucial aspects for economics arguments: first, knowledge regularly
has spill-overs, positive externalities, and the firm investing in the
research cannot capture all of these; and second, general purpose
knowledge may not yield payoff for a much longer time than firms
or venture capitalists are willing to plan for even if society is willing
to plan for the longer run.
1. Explain how the first factor leads firms to under-invest, from
society's point of view, in creating new scientific knowledge.
2. Explain how the second factor leads firms to under-invest, from
society's point of view, in creating new scientific knowledge. Your
answer should include different discount factors.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Fd5d616fa-0200-42ca-91ed-fd5af48464b8%2Fa1c8b209-01ed-46b8-a8fa-666ec25b5eb6%2F3qastp_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:D. In many parts of the economy, scientific knowledge is what might
be thought of as a general purpose tool. There is old wisdom, still
relevant, about the funding of scientific discoveries by individuals
and firms. From 1883, in Sidgwick's The Principles of Political
Economy, we have the following.
scientific discoveries... however ultimately profitable
to industry, have not generally speaking a market value:
the inventions in which the discovery is applied can be
protected by patents; but the extent to which any given
discovery will aid invention is mostly so uncertain, that
even if the secret of a law of nature could be conveniently
kept, it would not be worth an inventor's while to buy it,
in the hope of being able to make something of it. [Book
II, Ch. III, §3]
Beyond this, general purpose knowledge has (at least) two other
crucial aspects for economics arguments: first, knowledge regularly
has spill-overs, positive externalities, and the firm investing in the
research cannot capture all of these; and second, general purpose
knowledge may not yield payoff for a much longer time than firms
or venture capitalists are willing to plan for even if society is willing
to plan for the longer run.
1. Explain how the first factor leads firms to under-invest, from
society's point of view, in creating new scientific knowledge.
2. Explain how the second factor leads firms to under-invest, from
society's point of view, in creating new scientific knowledge. Your
answer should include different discount factors.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:
9781947172364
Author:
Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:
OpenStax
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506381
Author:
James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:
9781947172364
Author:
Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:
OpenStax
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506381
Author:
James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781337617383
Author:
Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
