Can you explain 3.133 part c? ToolsHelpkhem's Kindle for Mac - Statistics: Unlocking the Power of Data, 3rd Editionof 839Page 27424 of the 240 measurements resulted in a positivepesticide detection.200%X53 Location 5848andard Error272 Location 62563.133 pertain to274. Location 6293at Proportion Have818 Location 1828936 (b) (0.28, 0.45)(a) Calculate the sample difference in proportions:proportion of measurements resulting in pesti-cide detection while eating non-organic minusproportion of measurements resulting in pesti-cide detection while eating organic.(b) Figure 3.35 gives a bootstrap distribution for thedifference in proportions, based on 1000 sim-ulated bootstrap samples. Approximate a 98%confidence interval.(c) Interpret this interval in context.0.250.350.400.45Figure 3.35 Bootstrap distribution for the difference inproportions0.303.134 Donating Blood to Grandma? There is someevidence that "young blood" might improve thehealth, both physically and cognitively, of elderly34% Page 274 of 839 Location 6292 of 18730Adrienne Moncrief (Mentor) 8/16/22stapsystandis incareTabinfecTriclcNo TTotal(a) Gest(b) Gival(c) Us.con(d) Inteclucarewe cin st.3.136 H em's Kindle for Mac - Statistics: Unlocking the Power of Data, 3rd EditionPage 274of 83935848on 6256cain totion 6293on Haveation 1828928, 0.45)(b) Simulate more bootstrap samples.(c) Decrease the confidence level from 99% to95%.3.133 What Proportion Have Pesticides Detected?In addition to the quantitative variable pesticideconcentration, the researchers also report whetheror not the pesticide was detected in the urine (atstandard detection levels). Before the participantsstarted eating organic, 111 of the 240 measurements(combining all pesticides and people) yielded a pos-itive pesticide detection. While eating organic, only24 of the 240 measurements resulted in a positivepesticide detection.(a) Calculate the sample difference in proportions:proportion of measurements resulting in pesti-cide detection while eating non-organic minusproportion of measurements resulting in pesti-ide detection while eating organic.(b) Figure 3.35 gives a bootstrap distribution for thedifference in proportions, based on 1000 sim-ulated bootstrap samples. Approximate a 98%confidence interval.(c) Interpret this interval in context.34% Page 274 of 839 Location 6292 of 18730Adrienne Moncrief (Mentor) 8/16/22tvMacBook AirStaph Infadded to Fpaste. It isone's chanthe oppositbiologists srecorded wand which hteria, whiching a seriousin Table 3.16mate the diff.staph bacteriasystem and thand others, this investigatingcare productsTable 3.16 Iinfections?TriclosanNo TriclosanTotal(a) Give notaticestimating.— AR

Question

Can you explain 3.133 part c? ToolsHelpkhem's Kindle for Mac - Statistics: Unlocking the Power of Data, 3rd Editionof 839Page 27424 of the 240 measurements resulted in a positivepesticide detection.200%X53 Location 5848andard Error272 Location 62563.133 pertain to274. Location 6293at Proportion Have818 Location 1828936 (b) (0.28, 0.45)(a) Calculate the sample difference in proportions:proportion of measurements resulting in pesti-cide detection while eating non-organic minusproportion of measurements resulting in pesti-cide detection while eating organic.(b) Figure 3.35 gives a bootstrap distribution for thedifference in proportions, based on 1000 sim-ulated bootstrap samples. Approximate a 98%confidence interval.(c) Interpret this interval in context.0.250.350.400.45Figure 3.35 Bootstrap distribution for the difference inproportions0.303.134 Donating Blood to Grandma? There is someevidence that &#34;young blood&#34; might improve thehealth, both physically and cognitively, of elderly34% Page 274 of 839 Location 6292 of 18730Adrienne Moncrief (Mentor) 8/16/22stapsystandis incareTabinfecTriclcNo TTotal(a) Gest(b) Gival(c) Us.con(d) Inteclucarewe cin st.3.136 H em's Kindle for Mac - Statistics: Unlocking the Power of Data, 3rd EditionPage 274of 83935848on 6256cain totion 6293on Haveation 1828928, 0.45)(b) Simulate more bootstrap samples.(c) Decrease the confidence level from 99% to95%.3.133 What Proportion Have Pesticides Detected?In addition to the quantitative variable pesticideconcentration, the researchers also report whetheror not the pesticide was detected in the urine (atstandard detection levels). Before the participantsstarted eating organic, 111 of the 240 measurements(combining all pesticides and people) yielded a pos-itive pesticide detection. While eating organic, only24 of the 240 measurements resulted in a positivepesticide detection.(a) Calculate the sample difference in proportions:proportion of measurements resulting in pesti-cide detection while eating non-organic minusproportion of measurements resulting in pesti-ide detection while eating organic.(b) Figure 3.35 gives a bootstrap distribution for thedifference in proportions, based on 1000 sim-ulated bootstrap samples. Approximate a 98%confidence interval.(c) Interpret this interval in context.34% Page 274 of 839 Location 6292 of 18730Adrienne Moncrief (Mentor) 8/16/22tvMacBook Air<>Staph Infadded to Fpaste. It isone's chanthe oppositbiologists srecorded wand which hteria, whiching a seriousin Table 3.16mate the diff.staph bacteriasystem and thand others, this investigatingcare productsTable 3.16 Iinfections?TriclosanNo TriclosanTotal(a) Give notaticestimating.— AR

Accepted Answer

The bootstrapping procedure essentially considers multiple resamples (with replacement) for a…

(c) Interpret this interval in context. 0.25 0.40 0.45 Figure 3.35 Bootstrap distribution for the difference in proportions 0.30 0.35