Bart Inc. developed a new medical rub called “NoPain Muscular Rub” that can be used in the event of muscular back pains. Bart Inc. via an online advertisement, stated that they are willing to pay $5,000 to anyone who used their muscle rub “Nopain” for one week and still suffers with back pains thereafter.   Bill who suffer from back pains, saw the online advertisement and decided to purchase “NoPain Muscular Rub”. He used it for a full week, but nevertheless still suffered from back pains. Based on the fact that the muscular rub “Nopain” did not relieve his back pains, he sued Bart Inc. for the monies that were promised.   However, Bart Inc. argued that the advertisement was not an offer, but an invitation to invite offers.  They further argued that at no point in time did Bill make an offer and as such, they are not bound to pay him any monies, since the parties did not create any binding agreement.   Advised Bill on his legal options using IRAC

icon
Related questions
Question

Bart Inc. developed a new medical rub called “NoPain Muscular Rub” that can be used in the event of muscular back pains. Bart Inc. via an online advertisement, stated that they are willing to pay $5,000 to anyone who used their muscle rub “Nopain” for one week and still suffers with back pains thereafter.

 

Bill who suffer from back pains, saw the online advertisement and decided to purchase “NoPain Muscular Rub”. He used it for a full week, but nevertheless still suffered from back pains. Based on the fact that the muscular rub “Nopain” did not relieve his back pains, he sued Bart Inc. for the monies that were promised.

 

However, Bart Inc. argued that the advertisement was not an offer, but an invitation to invite offers.  They further argued that at no point in time did Bill make an offer and as such, they are not bound to pay him any monies, since the parties did not create any binding agreement.

 

Advised Bill on his legal options using IRAC 

Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer