A writ was lodged in the Supreme Court in the week after year-end claiming damages for illness allegedly caused by chemicals used at a subsidiary company’s manufacturing plant in the 1990s. This is the tenth such writ lodged, and the client has denied responsibility in all cases because it was unreasonable to believe at that time that these chemicals had adverse health effects. The claimant has new scientific evidence that counters this defence. Which subsequent event is this and what is the treatment for this?

A writ was lodged in the Supreme Court in the week after year-end claiming damages for illness allegedly caused by chemicals used at a subsidiary company’s manufacturing plant in the 1990s. This is the tenth such writ lodged, and the client has denied responsibility in all cases because it was unreasonable to believe at that time that these chemicals had adverse health effects. The claimant has new scientific evidence that counters this defence. Which subsequent event is this and what is the treatment for this?

Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305224414

Author:JENNINGS

Publisher:JENNINGS

Chapter3: The Judicial System

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2QAP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Vaughn Manufacturing is being sued for illness caused to local residents as a result of negligence on the company's part in permitting the local residents to be exposed to highly toxic chemicals from its plant. Vaughn's lawyer states that it is probable that Vaughn will lose the suit and be found liable for a judgment costing Vaughn anywhere from $1820000 to $8970000. However, the lawyer states that the most probable cost is $5370000. As a result of the above facts, Vaughn should accrue O a loss contingency of $5370000 but not disclose any additional contingency. O a loss contingency of $1820000 and disclose an additional contingency of up to $7150000. O no loss contingency but disclose a contingency of $1820000 to $8970000. O a loss contingency of $5370000 and disclose an additional contingency of up to $3600000.
c) A writ was lodged in the Supreme Court in the week after year-end claiming damages for illness allegedly caused by chemicals used at a subsidiary company’s manufacturing plant in the 1990s. This is the tenth such writ lodged, and the client has denied responsibility in all cases because it was unreasonable to believe at that time that these chemicals had adverse health effects. The claimant has new scientific evidence that counters this defence. (d) The review of subsequent cash receipts has revealed that several of the trade receivables that were considered doubtful have now been paid. However, the audit procedures have shown that a large debtor that was considered safe at 30 June was unexpectedly declared bankrupton 20 July. The year-end for the company is 30 June and the audit report is due to be signed on 20 August.Required:For each of the items above, explain what type of subsequent event it is and the appropriate treatment of the item in the financial report.
Swifty Corporation is being sued for illness caused to local residents as a result of negligence on the company's part in permitting the local residents to be exposed to highly toxic chemicals from its plant. Swifty's lawyer states that it is probable that Swifty will lose the suit and be found liable for a judgment costing Swifty anywhere from $ 1830000 to $ 8960000. However, the lawyer states that the most probable cost is $ 5410000. As a result of the above facts, Swifty should accrue a loss contingency of $ 1830000 and disclose an additional contingency of up to $ 7130000. a loss contingency of $ 5410000 and disclose an additional contingency of up to $ 3550000. no loss contingency but disclose a contingency of $ 1830000 to $ 8960000. a loss contingency of $ 5410000 but not disclose any additional contingency.
Caplan Pharma, Inc., recently was sued by a competitor for possible infringement of the competitor’s patent on a top-selling flu vaccine. The plaintiff is suing for damages of $15 million. Caplan's CFO has discussed the case with legal counsel, who believes it is possible that Caplan will not be able to successfully defend the lawsuit. The CFO knows that current U.S. accounting guidelines require that come gencies (such as lawsuits) must be disclosed in the annual report when a loss is possible. However, she is unsure whether this rule must be applied in the preparation of interim financial statements. She also knows that disclosure is necessary only if the amount is material, but she is unsure whether materiality should be assessed in relation to results for the interim period or for the entire year. Required Search current U.S. accounting standards to determine whether contingencies are required to be disclosed in interim reports, and, if so, how materiality is to be determined.…
On March 2015, Agency A is taking legal action against its competitor for patent infringement relating to a patent that had been granted to the agency on one of its products. The outcome of the case is uncertain. However, it is probable that the court will order the competitor to pay damages to the entity. Use facts given in No. 1, but assumes that on June 2015 the Chief Legal Counsel of Agency A informs the management that it is now virtually certain that the court will order the competitor to pay damages to the entity. State whether a contingent liability or contingent asset exists. Explain your answers by stating the criteria of your answers below.
Superb Corporation is being sued for illness caused to local residents as a result of negligence on the company's part in permitting the local residents to be exposed to highly toxic chemicals from its plant. Superb’s lawyer states that it is probable that Superb will lose the suit and be found liable for a judgment costing Superb anywhere from $1,200,000 to $6,000,000. However, the lawyer states that the most probable cost is $3,600,000. As a result of the above facts, Superb should accrue Select one: a loss contingency of $3,600,000 and disclose an additional contingency of up to $2,400,000. a loss contingency of $3,600,000 but not disclose any additional contingency. a loss contingency of $1,200,000 and disclose an additional contingency of up to $4,800,000. no loss contingency but disclose a contingency of $1,200,000 to $6,000,000.
Superb Corporation is being sued for illness caused to local residents as a result of negligence on the company's part in permitting the local residents to be exposed to highly toxic chemicals from its plant. Superb's lawyer states that it is probable that Superb will lose the suit and be found liable for a judgment costing Superb anywhere from $1,200,000 to $6,000,000. However, the lawyer states that the most probable cost is $3,600,000. As a result of the above facts, Superb should accrue Select one: а. no loss contingency but disclose a contingency of $1,200,000 to $6,000,000. O b. a loss contingency of $1,200,000 and disclose an additional contingency of up to $4,800,000. Ос. a loss contingency of $3,600,000 but not disclose any additional contingency. O d. a loss contingency of $3,600,000 and disclose an additional contingency of up to $2,400,000.
Wooten Co. is being sued for illness caused to local residents as a result of negligence on the company's part in permitting the local residents to be exposed to highly toxic chemicals from its plant. Wooten's lawyer states that it is probable that Wooten will lose the suit and be found liable for a judgment costing Wooten anywhere from $1,800,000 to $9,000,000. However, the lawyer states that the most probable cost is $5,400,000. As a result of the above facts, Wooten should accrue A) a loss contingency of $1,800,000 and disclose an additional contingency of up to $7,200,000. B) a loss contingency of $5,400,000 and disclose an additional contingency of up to $3,600,000. C) a loss contingency of $5,400,000 but not disclose any additional contingency. D) no loss contingency but disclose a contingency of $1,800,000 to $9,000,000.
ProWasher is the defendant in a patent infringement lawsuit filed by Sue Case over ProWasher’s use of a hydraulic compressor in several of its products. Anna Turney claims that, if the suit goes against ProWasher, the loss may be as much as $5 million. It is more likely than not that ProWasher will have to pay some amount on the settlement. Although the exact amount is not known, the lawyer has been able to assign probabilities and expected payment amounts as follows (based on Statistics - probability distributions): 20% probability that the settlement will be $5 million, 35% probability that the settlement required will be $3 million, and 45% that no settlement will be required. How much is the patent liability?
ProWasher is the defendant in a patent infringement lawsuit filed by Sue Case over ProWasher’s use of a hydraulic compressor in several of its products. Anna Turney claims that, if the suit goes against ProWasher, the loss may be as much as $5 million. It is more likely than not that ProWasher will have to pay some amount on the settlement. Although the exact amount is not known, the lawyer has been able to assign probabilities and expected payment amounts as follows (based on Statistics - probability distributions): 20% probability that the settlement will be $5 million, 35% probability that the settlement required will be $3 million, and 45% that no settlement will be required. How much is the liability and explain
a b Weaver Company is being sued by a former employee, Weaver believes that there is a remote chance that the employee will win. The employee suing Weaver for damages of $40,000 Gulf Refinery had a gas explosion on one of its oil rigsGulf believes it is likely that it will have to pay environmental clean-up costs and damages in the future due to the gas explosion. Gulf cannot estimate the amount of the damages Lawson Enterprises estimates that it will have to pay $75,000 in warranty repairs next year
The review of minutes and confirmation letter obtained from the legal counsel of the company revealed the following information: • EMPLEO has been named a liable party for toxic waste cleanup on its land, and must pay an as-yet undetermined amount for environmental remediation activities. An adjoining land owner, Clear Toothpaste Company, sold its property because of possible toxic contamination of the water supply and resulting potential adverse public reaction towards its product. Clear Toothpaste sued EMPLEO for damages. There is reasonable possibility that Clear Toothpaste will prevail and be awarded between P250,000 and P600,000. o EMPLEO is also the defendant of a lawsuit on an incident involving an accidental crash by its company car to another vehicle. In your inspection of the letter obtained from its legal counsel, they believe that the company would be liable to pay damages amounting to P300,000, but it is also possible that it will pay up to P500,000. Question: How much…