8. A sociologist focusing on popular culture and media believes that the average number of hours per week (hrs/week) spent using social media is greater for women than for men. Examining two independent simple random samples of 50 individuals each, the researcher calculates sample standard deviations of 2.3 hrs/week and 2.5 hrs/week for women and men respectively. If the average number of hrs/week spent using social media for the sample of women is 1 hour greater than that for the sample of men, what conclusion can be made from testing the null hypothesis that the time spent using social media is the same for women and men against the alternative that it's higher for women? (a = 0.01) A conclusion is not possible without knowing the average number of hrs/week spent using social media in each sample. We can not reject the null hypothesis so we can conclude that the observed difference in average number of hrs/week spent using social media is significant at 1% significance level. We can not reject the null hypothesis so we can conclude that the observed difference in average number of hrs/week spent using social media is not significant at 1% significance level. We reject the null hypothesis so we can conclude that the observed difference in average number of hrs/week spent using social media is significant at 1% significance level. We reject the null hypothesis so we can conclude that the observed difference in average number of hrs/week spent using social media is not significant at 1% significance level.
8. A sociologist focusing on popular culture and media believes that the average number of hours per week (hrs/week) spent using social media is greater for women than for men. Examining two independent simple random samples of 50 individuals each, the researcher calculates sample standard deviations of 2.3 hrs/week and 2.5 hrs/week for women and men respectively. If the average number of hrs/week spent using social media for the sample of women is 1 hour greater than that for the sample of men, what conclusion can be made from testing the null hypothesis that the time spent using social media is the same for women and men against the alternative that it's higher for women? (a = 0.01) A conclusion is not possible without knowing the average number of hrs/week spent using social media in each sample. We can not reject the null hypothesis so we can conclude that the observed difference in average number of hrs/week spent using social media is significant at 1% significance level. We can not reject the null hypothesis so we can conclude that the observed difference in average number of hrs/week spent using social media is not significant at 1% significance level. We reject the null hypothesis so we can conclude that the observed difference in average number of hrs/week spent using social media is significant at 1% significance level. We reject the null hypothesis so we can conclude that the observed difference in average number of hrs/week spent using social media is not significant at 1% significance level.
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter4: Equations Of Linear Functions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 8SGR
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
Transcribed Image Text:8. A sociologist focusing on popular culture and media believes that the average number of hours
per week (hrs/week) spent using social media is greater for women than for men. Examining two
independent simple random samples of 50 individuals each, the researcher calculates sample
standard deviations of 2.3 hrs/week and 2.5 hrs/week for women and men respectively. If the
average number of hrs/week spent using social media for the sample of women is 1 hour greater
than that for the sample of men, what conclusion can be made from testing the null hypothesis
that the time spent using social media is the same for women and men against the alternative
that it's higher for women? (a = 0.01)
A conclusion is not possible without knowing the average number of hrs/week spent using social media in
each sample.
We can not reject the null hypothesis so we can conclude that the observed difference in average number of
hrs/week spent using social media is significant at 1% significance level.
We can not reject the null hypothesis so we can conclude that the observed difference in average number of
hrs/week spent using social media is not significant at 1% significance level.
We reject the null hypothesis so we can conclude that the observed difference in average number of
hrs/week spent using social media is significant at 1% significance level.
We reject the null hypothesis so we can conclude that the observed difference in average number of
hrs/week spent using social media is not significant at 1% significance level.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill