3. An "interpretation" for a logical statement consists of a domain D (any non-empty set of elements) and a meaning for each predicate symbol. For example, D= {1,2} and P(x): "> 0" is an interpre- tation for the statement Vr ED, P(x) (in this case, one that happens to make the statement true). For each statement below, provide one interpretation under which the statement is true and another interpretation under which the statement is false if either case is not possible, explain why clearly and concisely. You may reuse examples if you wish. (a) (b) (c) xD, Vy € D, P(x, y) Vr ED, Vy ED, P(x,y) P(y, x) P(y, z)] AN ED, Vy ED,-P(x, y)] D.Q(x)] Nx € D, P(x)]

Elements Of Modern Algebra
8th Edition
ISBN:9781285463230
Author:Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Chapter2: The Integers
Section2.1: Postulates For The Integers (optional)
Problem 18E: In Exercises , prove the statements concerning the relation on the set of all integers. 18. If ...
icon
Related questions
Question

Please help me with these questions. I am having trouble understanding what to do. Please complete all the 4 question

Please show your work

Thank you

3. An "interpretation" for a logical statement consists of a domain D (any non-empty set of elements)
and a meaning for each predicate symbol. For example, D = {1,2} and P(r): "r>0" is an interpre-
tation for the statement Vr D, P(r) (in this case, one that happens to make the statement true).
For each statement below, provide one interpretation under which the statement is true and another
interpretation under which the statement is false if either case is not possible, explain why clearly
and concisely. You may reuse examples if you wish.
(a) (x € D, Vy ED, P(x, y) = P(y, x)
(b)
(c)
Vr ED, Vy D, P(x, y) ➡P(y, z)] ^ VrЄ D, Vy Є D, -P(x,y)]
ED, Q(x)]
[√x € D, P(x)]
Transcribed Image Text:3. An "interpretation" for a logical statement consists of a domain D (any non-empty set of elements) and a meaning for each predicate symbol. For example, D = {1,2} and P(r): "r>0" is an interpre- tation for the statement Vr D, P(r) (in this case, one that happens to make the statement true). For each statement below, provide one interpretation under which the statement is true and another interpretation under which the statement is false if either case is not possible, explain why clearly and concisely. You may reuse examples if you wish. (a) (x € D, Vy ED, P(x, y) = P(y, x) (b) (c) Vr ED, Vy D, P(x, y) ➡P(y, z)] ^ VrЄ D, Vy Є D, -P(x,y)] ED, Q(x)] [√x € D, P(x)]
(b)
nd Q
UP()) (x = U, Q(x))] = U.P(z) AQ(@)]
Prove or disprove that, for any
(d)
Prove or disprove that, for any universal set U and predicate P
VxU, P(x)] [3x € U, P(x)]
Transcribed Image Text:(b) nd Q UP()) (x = U, Q(x))] = U.P(z) AQ(@)] Prove or disprove that, for any (d) Prove or disprove that, for any universal set U and predicate P VxU, P(x)] [3x € U, P(x)]
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 41 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Elements Of Modern Algebra
Elements Of Modern Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463230
Author:
Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
College Algebra
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305115545
Author:
James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning