1.) Peter Singer, in his article, Fix your Diet, Save the Planet, argues that we should adjust our diet to help with climate change. "Singer is a preference utilitarian. They argue that the consequences to be promoted are those which satisfy the wishes or preferences of the maximum numbers of beings who have preferences."* How might a person who is a preference utilitarian disagree with Singer? Or put another way, construct an argument that supports the idea that eating what we want will ultimately satisfy more people's preferences. please use link to answer thank you ! *https://www.thetablet.co.uk/student-zone/ethics/utilitarianism/preference-utilitarianism

1.) Peter Singer, in his article, Fix your Diet, Save the Planet, argues that we should adjust our diet to help with climate change. "Singer is a preference utilitarian. They argue that the consequences to be promoted are those which satisfy the wishes or preferences of the maximum numbers of beings who have preferences."* How might a person who is a preference utilitarian disagree with Singer? Or put another way, construct an argument that supports the idea that eating what we want will ultimately satisfy more people's preferences. please use link to answer thank you ! *https://www.thetablet.co.uk/student-zone/ethics/utilitarianism/preference-utilitarianism