Buckwold and Kitunen, Canadian Income Taxation, 2010-2011 Ed.
CHAPTER 10
INDIVIDUALS: DETERMINATION OF TAXABLE INCOME
AND TAXES PAYABLE
Review Questions
1.
Briefly explain the difference, for individuals, between net income for tax purposes and taxable income.
2.
Explain the difference between an allowable capital loss and a net capital loss.
3.
Describe the tax treatment of net capital losses.
4.
Explain how a non-capital loss is created and how it is treated for tax purposes.
5.
Is it always worthwhile to utilize a net capital loss or a non-capital loss as soon as the opportunity arises? Explain.
6.
Is it possible for taxpayers to pay tax on more income than they actually earned over a period of
…show more content…
Net capital losses, therefore, may consist of the unused allowable capital losses of a number of years, and may be available for deduction in other years in arriving at the taxable income of those other years (see 3 below) [ITA 111(1)(b)].
R10-3.
Net capital losses can be carried back three years and forward indefinitely from the year in which they were incurred. During the carry-over period, the net capital losses can be deducted in arriving at taxable income only to the extent that the taxpayer has realized net taxable capital gains (gains minus losses) for that year [ITA 111(1)(b), 111(1.1)].There is an exception to this rule for the year of death and the preceding year. In those two years, an individual may deduct net capital losses against all sources of income [ITA 111(2)].
R10-4.
If, in a particular year, the aggregating formula for determining a taxpayer's net income for tax purposes does not permit the full deduction of employment losses, business losses, property losses, and allowable business investment losses because there is insufficient income in that year, the unused portion is classified as a non- capital loss. Non-capital losses can be carried back three years and forward twenty years from the year in which they are incurred,
11. Capital Accounts can be Negative. Tax Basis can not be Negative so your Tax Basis will be "0", but the Loss can be carried forward under the At-Risk Rules.
According to sec100-50, the net capital gain or net capital loss for the income year is
A corporation cannot use net operating losses between C corporation years and S corporation years, with the only exception that net operating losses from C corporation years can reduce net recognized built-in gains from S corporation years.
25-7 If a loss cannot be accrued in the period when ti is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred because the amount of loss cannot be reasonable estimated, the loss shall be charged to the income of the period in which the loss can be reasonably estimated and shall not be charged retroactively to an earlier period. All estimated losses for loss contingencies shall be charged to income rather than charging some to income and others to retained earnings as prior period adjustments.”
As discussed above, if indicators of impairment exist for an asset (group) to be held and used, an entity determines whether the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the asset (group) in question is less than its carrying amount. If those undiscounted cash flows are less than
Section 360-10-35-17 of the Code states that an impairment loss shall be recognized if the carrying value of a fixed asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying value of the fixed asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and disposal of the asset. An impairment loss shall be measured by the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value.
Net capital loss carryovers but not carrybacks are deductible against capital gains in determining a corporation 's net operating loss for the year. True
ASC 320-10-35-35: “In periods after the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment loss for debt securities, an entity shall account for the other-than-temporarily impaired debt security as if the debt security had
According to ASC 450-20-25-1, “When a loss contingency exists, the likelihood that the future event or events will confirm the loss or impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability can range from probable to remote. As indicated in the definition of contingency, the term loss is used for convenience to include many charges against income that are commonly referred to as expenses and others that are commonly
An impairment loss shall be recognized only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is
As per ASC 450-20-25-2, entities should accrue an estimated loss from a loss contingency by a charge to expense and a liability recorded only if both of the following conditions are met:
The new ‘Carry Forward’ rules allow unused Annual Allowance to be carried forward by up to three years. Where an individual wishes to use ‘Carry Forward’, the Annual Allowance for previous years is deemed to have been £50,000.[pic]
There presents some positive evidence to avoid the recording of valuation allowance. First, Packer, Inc has a profitable operation history from 1995 to 1997, despite a significant loss in 1994. This is agreed by FASB, which states that a “strong earnings history coupled with evidence indicating that the loss (for example, an unusual, infrequent, or extraordinary item) is an aberration rather than a continuing condition” is a piece of positive evidence (FASB 740-10-30-22). These profits may be carried forward into the future to offset net-operating loss. Secondly, Packer may not generate any significant U.S Federal tax net operating loss carry forwards in the near future because it has the ability to utilize tax planning, such as capitalization of R&D. Thirdly, Packer has never lost deferred tax benefits due to expiration of a US net operating loss carry-forwards.
(f) Passive loss allowed (attach Form 8582 if required) (g) Passive income from Schedule K–1 (h) Nonpassive loss from Schedule K–1
INVESTools should definitely capitalize these expenses. The practice of not capitalizing these expenses has led to routine recording of net losses