Issues / Questions Whether or not the actions of Ms. Leslie Gonzales towards Mr. Ray Garcia establishes an act of sexual harassment.
Brief Answer Yes. Ray Garcia may file a sexual harassment complaint against Leslie Gonzales. The actions of Leslie towards Ray may constitute sexual harassment based on the Sexual Harassment Act of 1995 (RA 7877) and in consonance with jurisprudence. Nevertheless, with only the statement of Ray as proof and the lack of witnesses, although the presence of witnesses is not a requisite in RA 7877, the complaint may be faced with difficulties as the burden of proof lies on the claimant.
Statement of Facts Ms. Leslie Gonzales is the VP for Corporate Relations of ILA Company. Ray Garcia directly
…show more content…
4. OVERNIGHT AT PAMPANGA
From there on, for at least twice a month, Ray noticed that Leslie would always require him to drive her to Pampanga and would ask him very personal questions during the trip. On one occasion, when Leslie instructed him to stay overnight, she went inside his room, on a nightwear, bringing a wine, and ordered him to drink with her. Ray again felt that he couldn’t say no to his boss, so after pondering that he is sure he’s not doing anything wrong, he then allowed her to stay in his room.
On this, Leslie expounded that since 2009, even before the permits for the project were granted, she often travel to Pampanga to attend to permitting requirements, local consultation sessions, field assessment, etc. There were many occasions before that she’d ask either Atty. Cesar Carreon, a former Corporate Legal Counsel of PLA Co., or Atty. Henry Sinyo who was then the assisting lawyer of Atty. Carreon, to drive to Pampanga having only her as a companion. 5. POST VALENTINE’S DAY
After Valentines’s day, Leslie summoned Ray to her office. Upon saying that she forgot to greet him on Valentine’s day, Leslie removed her coat revealing a see-through blouse. Leslie then approached him motioning that she will give him a kiss on the cheek. When Ray avoided it, Leslie, who according to Ray
The case Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. v. Douglas Castro asserts that Douglas Castro, a former
Pat McGuiness – lawyer, he was the leading lawyer representing Brenton, after the trial he did more
COUNSEL: For Plaintiff: Mona C. Engel, Esq., Law Offices of Robert F. Danzi, Westbury, New York.
STATEMENT OF FACTS: Sheila White interviewed with Marvin Brown and obtained a job as a “track laborer” with Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company. Shortly after her hire date, however, she assumed forklift operator duties. This new assignment still fell under the “track laborer” position description, and White occasionally performed those duties although her primary responsibility was operating the forklift. Three months into her new job, White complained to the company that her immediate supervisor was sexually harassing her on the job. He was temporarily suspended and required to attend sexual harassment training. White was then informed that she was being reassigned to track labor duties only. White
Crown lawyer was George Dangerfield, he played a huge part in the wrongful conviction of Thomas Sophonow.
I. “ Judge Patrick Pirtle is the district judge of the 251st District Court of Randall County, Texas, and this case, a capital murder case, is on the docket of that Court. “ (http://www.goextranet.net/Seminars/Examples/Disqualify/State%27sRecuseJudge.htm)
		He asked her, ³What are you asking for? Can you put it in plain words?²
him” (122), Faye exclaims realizing that she had once informed him that if he could not buy her what she
find out he is not. As soon as he gets in is to the chair and drinking
GIlbury and Lewiston worked together for several years. Their relationship was “cooperative”. Gilbury reported their relationship began to change and Lewiston’s behavior was “out of the ordinary”. The EEOC’s definition of sexual harassment was his actions “created an extremely sexually hostile environment” Many coworkers stated Lewiston was a “lonely” guy. Lewiston sent Gilbury several cards on different occasions one card accompanied with roses. He also asked her to lunch on 2 different occasions which she responded no to both times and told Lewiston she is “a happily married women”. One card stated “I hope you can
A supplemental affidavit of Mrs. Rodriguez de Olivares providing further details of her marriage to Mr. Olivares and extreme cruelty she suffered during her marriage and the explanation of documentation being requested by USCIS;
In accordance with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) situations that sexual harassment might occur can be verbal and/or physical in manner such as:
to go out with a few friends from work. She said she would be back
Organizations have an obligation to create a harassment free environment for its employees. Harassment doesn’t have to be of a sexual nature. An organization is liable if the harassment is so frequent or severe that it creates a hostile or offensive work environment or when it results in adverse employment actions such as the victim being fired, demoted, or transferred. Harassing a person based on their sex is illegal. Sexual harassment has a great impact on an employee’s productivity as well as poses a major impact on an organization’s finances in litigation.