Richard The Lionheart Research Paper

In prior years, Richard had gained much public support and accolades for his part in fighting Scotland. He uses this support in his next step of a move for the throne. In the past there had been rumors of Edward the IV being illegitimate, now there was evidence that Edward's son was illegitimate as well, as Edward IV had not been legally wed to Elizabeth when they had Edward V. Upon hearing this news, Richard chose to proceed with caution, only telling chief political players and asking their advice. Richard was wise for these actions. He had been known for his prudence in the past in the war with Scotland. When Edward IV wanted a crushing blow to the Scots, Richard realized that it would be too costly and at the same time England had already accomplished a great feat. Richard pushed

This led to the belief that he was invincible and that no harm could come to him. For example, he sent his whole army to war in Ireland without thinking that he may have a rebellion at home. If all of his army was away at war, nobody was left to protect him and his kingdom. Because Richard believed that he was unassailable, he led himself to his own demise.

Richard The Lionheart was born on September 8, 1157 at Beaumont Palace, Oxford. He gained his infamous nickname “Richard the Lionheart” through his experience of leading rebels in Poitou in 1170s against his father, Henry II. During the third crusades he won in the battles of Cyprus, Acre and Arusf against Saladin. Richard the lionheart was famous for his fighting ability and fought in many key battles during the Crusades.The battle of Arsuf for example is where he displayed his brilliant war tactics and the brutal force of his army. After executing the saracens of Acre the crusader army led by Richard travel south to capture the logistically vital port of Jaffa. By capturing Jaffa it would give the crusaders an intended launching pad to reclaim Jerusalem. Saladin

King Richard I was the brother of King John and was well-known for the wars he fought. His most noble act by far has been his leadership of The Third Crusades, which granted him the name “King Richard the Lionheart” by the

King Richard III was born in Northamptonshire, England, on October 2, 1452. Richard III was the youngest surviving son of Richard Plantagenet. When Richard III was a child his family engaged in a battle against Lancastrians for control for the country. In December of 1460 Richard III lost his father, an uncle and one of his brothers in a battle for the crown. Richard III other brother Edward IV was crowned king in March of 1461 over England. While Richard III’s brother Edward IV was king Richard III was placed as a prince over England. However seven years later King Henry IV fought King Edward IV and resumed power for a year. In 1480 Richard III helped King Edward IV invaded Scotland and was promised power for his help, but in 1483 when King

Richard, as we have seen, was a great warrior. This was probably one of the major reasons why we still remember him today. He was given the name Richard the Lionheart as a testament to his fighting skills. The name Richard the Lionheart probably captured many people’s attentions throughout history, because of its fear and power associated with such a name. The name also allows for a ‘romanticization’ of the Kings of England, because the name Lionheart could easily be thought of as a brave man in shining armour heading out to save a

His father, King Henry died in France at war with older son Richard (1189). Richard joined King Philip of France to attack Normandy. However the king of France failed to obtain Richards possessions while he had been captured. John then occupied Windsor Castle, but when Richard returned, he was recrowned in 1194. In the next five years Richard gained back all his land, only to have John lose it. John was named King at the age of 32 (John Lackland (r. 1199-1216)). However, another brother’s child should have been King, but according to “Plantagenet”, “Richard announced John his heir on his deathbed bed.”

records show two difference figure of King Richard III who is not just a historical,

Richard the lionhearted wears a disguise that makes him look like a big black knight that ends up saving our heroes from their demise. As I said previously I feel like this is a failed character arc and it never really fleshes out. He saved our heroes as “the black knight” and when he arrived I thought they were forming a party like an element to go dethrone/ kill prince Jon. I was sadly mistaken.

Richard I or often called the “Lionheart” was the Duke of Aquitaine, Poitiers, and Normandy. The count of Anjou and his later in his years The king of England. He was the son of King Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine. King Richard was born In Oxford, England on September 8, 1157, according to Geoffrey Wallis Steuart Barrow (2017). Hickman has stated in “Crusades: King Richard I the Lionheart of England” that He was the third son of King Henry II and was believed to be the favorite son of Eleanor of Aquitaine. He was smart, had a very dashing appearance, had skillful in military matters and worked to enforce his father’s rule in France.

King Richard II is a poor Machiavellian; cheating nobility out of their inheritance, listening to flatterers, easily changing his mind depending on what others say, and allowing his people to hate him are all things a Machiavellian prince shouldn't do. His poor qualities and his belief in immunity to a downfall lead others to hate and resent him and ultimately causes his downfall.

He was succeeded on the throne by Henry the VII, the first of the Tudor line who ruled England for the next 118 years. With the death of Richard there were, for all intents and purposes, no Yorkist contenders for the throne. (There were a couple of incidents with pretenders, but these were quickly and violently put down.) As a result, Henry was able to concentrate on his duties as king. As monarchs and heads of state do right up to the present, Henry made sure he was presented in the best light possible, and that Richard was portrayed as a really bad guy. It seems as if this got a little out of hand, and there is no question that Henry and his successors did nothing to rein in the writers of the time. Chief among these authors was none other than William Shakespeare,

The actual Richard II and the Richard III of literature are two distinct people—at least they are today. When the histories that covered the War of the Roses, including the story of Richard III’s rise to power, were first made, the historical version was much closer to the version found in history. This is, partially, due to the fact that the histories coincided with the moment the Tudor family gained control, marking a new chapter in the history of the British monarchy, and it was at this point that the Tudor Myth became cemented in history. The bias of the Tudor Myth is displayed in both the “historical” depictions of Richard and the literature depictions of Richard (Shakespeare’s Richard III, specifically). Both depictions use name calling,

Richard the Lion Hearted was the son of Henry II. He was a successful leader and the hero of the Third crusade. When he died, his brother took over. He was seen as a weak leader. He treated his people terribly. He tried to get all the money from the people. Especially a group of men called Barons. They were the wealthy class. This made a revolt against him. The people forced him to sign a document that included basic rights as no taxation without representation, a jury trial, and protection from the laws. This document will soon later be the foundation of the rights and the Declaration of Independence of the United States of America.

Richard III is seen as a monster and a horrible person, but why? What if people saw him differently or if his family treated him equally like others? Also nobody wants to love an ugly hunchback. This is how Richard is treated in the play. He despises everybody, including God and all of is creations so he decides to conquer the land and become King of England.