In the short story, “A Piece of Streak” by Jack London, the ideation of oppression and poverty by displayed the protagonist’, Tom King, he is a retired fighter, that struggles with his current situation. The sense of struggle and sadness is developed through the reoccurring themes of oppression and poverty, symbolism of the tobacco-less pipe and the dull and lifeless tone created through diction and literary devices. The theme of oppression is one of the main concepts that is explored by his failure to provide the basics of life, including: food, proper clothes, and a reliable income. Without these basic needs of life, a family in society would be considered improvised. The reader learns that the King family struggles to provide food for the children. The narrator states that, “the two children in the other room had been sent early to bed in order that in sleep they might forget they had gone supperless” (London 1). The inability to provide a meal for his children and wife is a clear example of poverty. In connection, the only food they are able to purchase is considered “lower class” food. The narrator mentions that Tom’s dinner consisted of. “flour [that have been borrowed from the neighbour] for the gravy. The last two ha’pennies had gone to buy bread” (1). As mentioned before, bread and low quality gravy is a “lower class” meal and is inexpensive. However, the family is still unable to provide food for dinner, one of the basics of life. Another component that is mentioned by the narrator that reflects oppression and poverty is the fact that they do not have proper and purposeful clothing. Within the character description, it is stated that Tom’s appearance consists of “a cotton shirt, a cheap, two shilling affair, showed a frayed collar” (1). Due to lack of financial security, they are unable to provide better clothes. The theme of oppression and poverty is an significant to develop the plot and create images throughout the text. The symbolism of the pipe is a significant to the theme of oppression and poverty, while developing the protagonist. The pipe represents what he used to have, which is now gone. In his youthful years, Tom was a successful fighter. However, as he aged, he became unable to continue
The author uses tone and images throughout to compare and contrast the concepts of “black wealth” and a “hard life”. The author combines the use of images with blunt word combinations to make her point; for example, “you always remember things like living in Woodlawn with no inside toilet”. This image evokes the warmth of remembering a special community with the negative, have to use outdoor facilities. Another example of this combination of tone and imagery is “how good the water felt when you got your bath from one of those big tubs that folk in Chicago barbecue in”. Again the author’s positive memory is of feeling fresh after her bath combined with a negative, the fact that it was a barbecue drum.
During these times, minimizing was the key for most families. Often this meant that items such as “shoes, socks and underwear were accessories” if any at all (Gentry 138). Due to this lack in appropriate clothing, many times “the family was held back from ‘social doin’s’ because of their unkempt appearance” (Corder and Miller 42). Along with the emotional embarrassment of their personal appearance, sharecroppers and their families suffered physical consequences. Often a lack of inadequate clothing left them more susceptible to illness, and in their circumstances, that was a risk they could not afford to take.
The essay begins with Henry George referring to his audience as ladies and gentlemen. He then goes on to state that poverty is a crime. A crime not committed by the poor, but rather the poor as victims of the crime. He also does not wholly blame those perpetrating the crime, he also gives a kind of notion that the victim has a hand the situation he or she finds themselves in. He says the poverty is a curse that not only the poor have but is on every level of society even the rich. He says the rich also suffer because it is like the air all the community breathes. They too must breathe it.
To understand literature is to not only understand human nature, but to also understand how the surrounding conditions affect humans. It is often the situation that people are placed in which drives their actions. Similarly, the Marxist approach to studying literature focuses on how certain economic conditions can affect character’s values and actions. In addition, Marxism teaches that wealth is a critical part of society, as without it many opportunities are no longer present. For example, an individual with wealth can go through life leisurely, while a person without it is subject to greater hardships. In the play A Raisin in the Sun by Lorraine Hansberry, the struggle due to economic conditions is evident, as the dreams and aspirations of the Younger family become deferred due to their struggles with poverty. The economic conditions of the Younger family not only lead to the deferral of their dreams, but also to the neglect of their moral values as they begin to see wealth as a necessity.
From the beginning of the story, we are shown racial inequalities. Ellison introduces us to our character who is a broke and hungry African American economically struggling to save his lady friend’s, Laura’s, life. The protagonist “got no birth certificate to
Throughout history, many people have been oppressed because of their race, religion and gender, resulting in the loss of their rights and freedom. Despite the fact that freedom is an inherent rights of any human being, many examples have proven that these rights often require rebellious acts to obtain said rights. Although human rights have evolved over the years, humans still fail to learn from their mistakes, resulting in history repeating itself. Through storytelling and novels, people show depictions of history to honour those who have died and to educate younger generations to prevent unfortunate events from occurring again. In this same vein, Lawrence Hill and Alice Walker display oppression through abuse, structural inequality and gender stereotypes. Although the novels, The Book of Negroes by Lawrence Hill and The Colour Purple by Alice Walker were written in different time periods and revolved around different cultural influences, each demonstrates the theme of oppression throughout various events.
The rich and privilege versus the poor and unprivileged are the people being compared to one another and recognized throughout both “The Lace-Makers” and “Letter From Birmingham Jail.” Otto-Peters throughout her poem compares the working class women to the rich men that take advantage of the product of their labor (lace), bring awareness to the injustices between the working class and those in power. This comparison is seen in, “You live in luxury and debauchery while they perish,” (line 21) where she is addressing the rich men that mentions earlier and how they do not acknowledge the injustices that happen for them to live in luxury. Similarly in “Letter From Birmingham Jail,” King describes the injustices that occur in society due to the government and law enforcement, “Its ugly record of police brutality is known in every section on this country. Its unjust treatment of Negroes in the courts is a notorious reality,” (81). The social injustices are brought into light for black people (and minorities) going unrecognized because they are seen as lesser than those in power and privileged. Both writers try to bring awareness their injustices, but they focus on their own experiences.
At first, Austen reveals the tensions between the working class and the upper class and emphasizes the rigid social structure that existed in nineteenth century London. The rigidity of the social structure can be attributed to the fact that “no class exists for itself but is bound by reciprocated rights and duties to classes above and below” (Kilger 359). Although the classes are separate and very distinct from each other, they still all depend on one another to thrive and succeed. However, this was definitely not the case during the
Source K is supported by Source L because it gives a descriptive insight into how people in lower class English society lived during the Victorian era. Source L helps us to imagine what the narrow passage and the inside and outside of their house looked like. For example, Sims writes; “The walls are damp and crumbling the ceiling is black and peeling off, and the floor is rotten and broken away in places and the wind and the rain sweep in through gaps that seem everywhere”. This descriptive quote written by George Sims in an article named “How the poor live”, gives us an insight of how the majority of the lower class English people lived, thus giving us a more descripted visual representation of what poor people in English society lived like.
A main factor in the storyline is the way the writer portrays society's attitude to poverty in the 18th century. The poor people were treated tremendously different to higher classed people. A lot of people were even living on the streets. For example, "He picked his way through the hordes of homeless
Life in the Iron Mills is a tragic yet poignant story of the effects of a man’s socioeconomic status. Although set in the nineteenth century, the story is all too familiar. The short story begins with a reflective narrator begging the audience to read the story with an open mind not tainted by the ideals of high society (Davis). The narrator suggests the story be read from the perspective of the protagonist, Hugh Wolfe, a lowly puddler at the iron mill (Davis). Hugh works long, hard hours at the mill for little to no pay in attempts to provide not only for himself but also for his cousin, Deborah, and a young girl, Janey (Davis). In Hugh’s spare time at the mill, he carves sculptures out of korl (Davis). Hugh leads a typical life of a working class citizen.
With the looming threat of global warming, overpopulation, and world war III we do not often find ourselves in a position to change the world around us. But what do we do when the situation presents itself? What is our response to injustice? Sometimes nothing. In first world countries it is easy to discuss an issue without taking action because people often feel too minimal to make an impact. However, history shows some of the largest social and political movements were sparked by the actions of a single individual with the audacity to stand up. The truth is power in the hands of an individual has the magnitude to create equal amounts of good as it does bad, but the power for change does not only lie in the hands of powerful, it can be found in the hearts of any individual, no matter their status or origin.
It did not all start with the Stamp Act Congress in 1765, but it was the accumulation of the other injustices that the americans had been going through before. The british were imposing taxes and treating the americans unjustly on their own land. It is not like that the people of that era did not sense that, but it was just a matter of time when they would start taking action for their own right. Individuals, patriots to be more precise, of that time took initiatives to fight for their right against the british people. Every americans must have felt that they were not treated the right way, but the voices of the people who started the discussion on that topic lead to a change.
Jack Finney’s “Contents of the Dead Man’s Pocket” portrays family as the most vital aspect of life by making Tom Benicke decide between his drudgery for money and closeness of his kinship. Firstly, in the short story, the author uses an idiom to reveal that Tom is acquisitive. This trait of Tom is evident when he says these lines to his wife Clare “You won’t mind, will you when money comes rolling” (Finney). The idiom “money comes rolling” depicts the riches of Tom and his hard work on materialistic things. Tom values opulent life more than family and is highlighted when Tom devotes less time for his wife making him acquisitive. Secondly, in the short story the
When jane was questioned if she had poor family would she rather live with them and be happy or stay miserable with the reeds she made it evident that despite her unhappiness she preferred to live with the rich because poverty was looked down. Those who were poor were treated badly, jane eyre is a perfect example.