Improving Performance Management Strategies And Alignment Between And Organizational Goals

CNI's use of this type of technology allows a collaborative exchange of information between coworkers and gives full participation between the audience and presenter. Yahoo instant messenger is also used within the workspace which allows employees to get immediate feedback from other employees when they are working off site and need support from team members. Blackberry telephones allow the management structure of CNI the ability to be in touch with their production / organizational teams as needed. And the use of webcams allowed the management teams from different geographical areas to communicate virtually face to face. Another valid strength of CNI's management is that they consistently deliver feedback on the performance of their subordinates through quarterly appraisals, specific achievement recognition, and annual appraisals. This type of feedback allows the individual to know what their work is having on other employees, the company, and the customer. Constructive feedback alerts an individual to an area in which his performance could improve. Constructive feedback is not criticism; it is descriptive and should always be directed to the action, not the person. The main purpose of constructive feedback is to help the employees to understand where they stand in relation to expected and / or productive job behavior. Recognition for effective performance is a powerful motivator. Most

Performance appraisal is a method which is increasingly used to evaluate employees to determine the degree to which they are performing effectively and encourage them to direct their energies towards organizational performance. Although the appraisal is being practiced, there are criticisms made against the system which generally arise from within the Orthodox and radical management frame work.

In order to create a high performance organization, we need to develop the capacity of Tamarack staff to perform and contribute to a workplace in which employees can develop their full potential. An effective performance management/appraisal system, which managers lead and own, helps us to achieve our goals by connecting employee contributions to the overall organizational goals and providing a system of appraisal that is forward thinking and supports development.

We could create a website where employees could provide their feedback (anonymously, if they wanted). As we progress through implementation and (hopefully) improvements, monthly updates on progress would have to be made as well. What are we measuring ourselves against (metrics) and how are we doing against those? We owe it to the employees to be transparent through this whole process.

Feedback- This area refers to the ongoing information that employees receive in the performance of their jobs. At my job, we receive feedback, letting us know that we exceeded the standards for call wait times or if we have not met this standard. Feedback also goes back to the management in that they become aware of the situations.

* Twice a Quarter Upper Management team members will provide employees with Goal feedback and assessment

case individual`s motivation affects their commitment to work and their work ethicattitude that is mainly influenced by the company`s management and work

A performance management system should consist of planning, monitoring, reviewing and evaluating (Hrcouncil.ca, 2015). During the planning phase management should identify, clarify and agree upon expectations of the employee. Also, in this phase management needs to determine how results will be measured, agree on the monitoring process and document the plan for performance management. Furthermore, this step is imperative for management to identify and ensure the performance objectives are explicitly stated to the employee. In the development of this phase management would

employees to their job description they have also created a system that reviews the employees

The performance review process often gets ignored in today’s agile operating environments where people change jobs quickly and employees often care more about their industry and peer reputations than they do about company rankings. Many companies have replaced the formal performance review with greater managerial input in daily operations, social media and customer reviews and informal check-ins. However, a formal appraisal still generates many critical benefits such as determining salary raises, promotional opportunities and candidates for more advanced training and succession planning.

Performance Management Within the Workplace The basis of the mainstream of performance appraisals within the modern workplace is one person (a manager or executive) rating one more, an intrinsically individual process. There are distinction such as 360 degree appraisals that include the judgment of others such as clientele and peers/colleagues in the process but it is the action of one person transitory judgment upon another that is subjective in nature and the root cause of many of the problems encountered in the research associated with performance appraisals. Performance appraisals are of importance to the organisation, as they often provide the only measure of an individual's contribution and

360 degree feedback system as a performance evaluation tool as long as the understanding of its intent is understood. “There are three key steps in the successful implementation of 360 degree feedback systems in an organization. The three steps are that it must fit the organizations culture, make it psychometrically sound, and used with care” (“Best Practices”, 2012). It is also important to train the feedback providers to be sensitive, respectful and polite. Treating employees in a friendly and respectful manner and offering constructive advice will make them more open to accepting the performance

Performance reviews are designed to both evaluate general performance and measure progress around specific goals. Both negative and positive aspects are incorporated in these reviews as they should serve as a point of reference to both look back in evaluation and ahead in anticipation. Pulling back from daily demands in order to assess and review employee performance allows managers to focus their attention on specific departments and clarify what is high priority to their company. Performance reviews also act as an opportunity to acknowledge working staff and identify professional development which will further support the staff members’ career growth. Reviews are seen as a powerful tool that can be tied to a company’s overall success;

In a typical and effective process of performance management, as demonstrated in Figure 2.1, performance appraisal is not the only but a vital element because it is the activity which evaluate the outcome of the work, recognize the achievement and weaknesses and give employees and managers a straightforward result on these(Armstrong, 2009, Hutchinson, 2013). From a modern perspective, performance appraisal covers more areas not only on what have been achieved but also on the attitude and contribution of the operator (Hutchinson, 2013), which enhance the functions of identifying training needs.

In an article from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management [OPM] (n.d.) it stated that “without feedback, you 're walking blind, at best, you 'll accidentally reach your goal, and at worst, you will wander aimlessly through the dark, never reaching your destination.” Feedback is a critical element in a managers “toolbox” when evaluating employees. It gives an employee a view of how good or bad their previous performance was and what or if they need to improve in their performance. It also reduces