Rebuttal While offering help to refugees is necessary, caution should be taken on the appropriateness of the immigrants. Individuals proposing that employees should be accepted in any country fail to present reliable evidence to justify their claims. In fact, issues arise when the aspect of peace raises questions among the locals. Fundamentally, accepting immigrants from war-torn areas into the U.S. is a way of fulfilling the moral obligation (Hansel 15). Besides, it saves individuals from brutal death and the disastrous outcomes of battle. Equally, it would be shameful for a well-developed country with many resources such as America to just sit back and watch as people suffer in front of their eyes knowing that they can offer assistance. …show more content…
is subject to debate. Firstly, the availability of cheap labor reduces the wages which high schools of Native American dropout get (Tichenor 11). Most refugees perform the difficult tasks that the well-educated citizens cannot undertake since they readily accept low wages. Since the labor intensive tasks do not require sophisticated skills, school dropouts find them as the best opportunities for them to acquire a salary. However, due to the benefits offered to the refugees already working there, the Americans have no option but accept the low wages. Even though the U.S. fulfills its humanitarian responsibility by giving homage to refugees, it would be unethical to do so at the cost of the natives. The danger imposed by the acceptance of immigrants from regions which face terrorism is a critical issue subject to questions. Although the U.S. government screens its refugees, it does not warrant the innocence of the foreigners (Hansel 18). It is possible for terrorists to invade the borders of America in the name of seeking refuge from wars in their countries. Similarly, if allowing immigrants into the nation triggers anxiety among the locals, it is not
A refugee is a person who was forced to leave their country. Whether it be from warfare or natural disaster, their homes are no longer safe to live in, so they need to relocate elsewhere. Once someone sets foot on the journey of becoming a refugee, they become vulnerable and dependent with no sense of what the future will bring. In an attempt to accommodate them, first world countries with the resources necessary to assist these refugees, are struggling to determine whether or not they should step-in and help. Some argue that taking them in could come with excessive consequences, while others believe they could be assets. Although there may be a few consequences, they are outweighed by the benefits and undeniable severity of the situation.
Immigration is both a domestic issue and global concern. It involves economics, politics, and culture. Unlike other current issues, it has been at the center of the American experience for hundreds of years (Tirman, John). Every year, hundreds of thousands of immigrants from around the world, come to the United States. These immigrants have many different motivations as to why they leave their home country; but as currents events indicate, it is injustice, poverty, and violence in their own country that generally make people move to save themselves and to ensure a better future for their families. Many of these people believe the United States is the best place to go, because there is more freedom, protection, and benefits,
Because of America’s great wealth and success, other countries expect us to open our boarders and gladly invite refugees into our towns and cities. Charles Wheelan does a fantastic job of encouraging Americans to do just that. However, he fails to think of the risks and errors that come with allowing hundreds of thousands of suffering people (Wheelan) into our country. People all across the globe think that rich Americans should help these people even though they have not personally asked our government officials to help them. Wheelan views this as a matter of bravery, responsibility, and fear of terrorists in his article Courage in Crises.
This paper will be discussing immigration policy, what fixes the United States needs to make to the current policy and what aspects should remain the same. This paper will first discuss what our current policy is, then transition its focus to immigration quotas, border patrol and security, and lastly discussing refugees. In order to reform the immigration policy, we must have an open policy for refugees. We will allow refugees to enter while still maintaining secure background checks and screenings. Along with that we must get all illegal immigrants currently in the United States on a path to citizenship, and maintain our immigration quotas while still doing what we
Every year, a huge number of immigrants, legal and illegal, from around the globe, decided to come into the United States. These migrants have many different goals that they have in mind. Some enter the United States hoping for a better life and some are refugees escaping from persecution or civil wars that happened in their motherland. Large number of these individuals trust the United States as the best place to go.
Immigrants renew our nation by injecting new capital, businesses, workers, and consumers into our economy, stimulating its growth. Immigrants offer to us a new, rich, and possibly exotic culture that gives us new insights into the deep histories and traditions of other nations. Immigrants give new perspectives on the journey of life, giving us the knowledge of the horrors of persecution and violent war that still persist in our world today. It is said that the success of our community is tied to the success of the people who make it up. As more and more people come to the United States in search of a better life, we must remember that it is our patriotic duty to welcome them and aid them in their quest to fulfill the American Dream. Indeed, we even may echo the famous words of “The New
The connotation of “illegal” immigration implies that a majority of immigrants enter the American border only to organize crime, yet a larger proportion of illegal aliens come to America solely with the intent to work. In reality, illegal immigrants demonstrate strong loyalty to America, placing importance in its function as a shelter and refuge from persecution (Gold 3). Thus, in contrast to the stereotypical portrait of illegal immigrants, the unauthorized population represents a responsible minority that demonstrates respect and compliance with American policies. According to the article,
The utterly diminished and persistently conflicted regime of Bashar Al-Assad has led to several forces, including numerous rebel groups, Kurdish forces, and even ISIL to occupy the war-torn country of Syria in a seemingly never-ending ruination. Most importantly however, it has also led to millions of Syrians becoming dislodged between the remnant regions with the deaths of roughly half a million citizens, according to the Syrian Centre for Policy Research, from a civil war that originated due to a series of protests and differentiating ideologies. The situation has lead for surviving Syrians, now properly known as refugees, to seek asylum in neighboring countries in Europe, but even including some countries as far as in the Western Hemisphere, particularly the United States.
was founded by immigrants and, with the exception of indigenous people, every person living in the U.S. is an immigrant or a descendant of an immigrant” (Dakwar 50). Knowing what people know about the origins of America, not allowing Muslim people or Syrians as a whole to take refuge makes Americans the hypocrisy of society. “Discriminating so overtly by religion, barring 1.6 billion people from entering the country, would be inconsistent with America’s rejection of religious discrimination and place the United States firmly outside international law, putting it in conflict with the founding charter of the United Nations and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights” (Abramsky 72). By not allowing the same thing to happen that founded the country they live in, Americans are effectively tearing down the system and the beliefs that they created. Dakwar reasonably and accurately states the product of the demise of this system, “Yet every new wave of immigrants has faced fear and hostility, especially during times of economic hardship, political turmoil, or war” (50). Not only is there a general message showing through that clearly represents the negative effects that can come of beliefs and taking action based on these principles, there are also specific examples of disasters that came about from similar situations. If anything, society should take something from history and learn from it, as that’s the only way to
Introduction: United states has been the country of immigration from long time. A huge cultural difference shows that U.S has flexible and acceptable policy for immigrants and refugees. But some citizen claims that they are facing a lot of problems and losing their certain opportunity due to immigrants and refugees. In support of immigrants, we will examine the opposition claims, and then we will turn our attention to the benefit and importance of accepting refugees and immigrants to our country.
Earlier this week The New York Times issued an account in their Sunday paper discussing the critical topic in regards to America accepting Refugees from the Middle East. The Times honed in on this topic in the column “ U.S Will Accept More Refugees as Crisis Grows”, written by Michael R. Gordon, Alison Smale, and Rick Lyman. The feature begins to discuss the problems that are being raised in the Middle East. Hundreds of thousands of men, women, and families in countries like Syria, Iraq, Somalia, and Bhutan are in danger due to the fact that their countries are facing war. This leads to the people of these countries being forced to leave in order to escape the war and oppression. These people are called Refugees. The problem cultivates as wealthier neighboring countries become reluctant in helping these refugees because of their anti-refuge politics. Refugees are then forced to travel as far away as they can, paying until they can no longer go any further. They are then forced into labor, later leading them to escape in an unsafe and deathly manner across the Mediterranean sea to Europe. This being the cause of the many deaths of men, women, and children across the Middle East as they had hopes of a better life elsewhere.The Washington Post also reflects on this subject in their column, “Refugees in America: Syrian family rebuilds life in the U.S” by Deepti Hajela. Hajela interviews a Syrian family, the Roustom. The father Hassan Al Roustom exclaims,
The topic of discrimination is one that has been a prominent issue all throughout history. Humans are rather known for taking all of the fear, mistrust, and hatred that they experience and act on it in a way that generalizes and segregates them from one another. Furthermore, they allow these feelings to cloud their judgement of right and wrong. One example of this is the Syrian Refugee crisis. Citizens and government officials are denying these refugees help in their time of need due to their misplaced discrimination and overall lack of compassion. Articles from websites such as CBS , CNN, and Newsweek have all taken a stance on what America needs to do for Syria, touching on aspects such as the statistical
This article talks about immigration and its consequences in America. In addition to this, the paper talks about the reasons behind the ballooning level of immigrants in amerce. Some of the reasons that the article outlines include; search for better employment in the US as they fear their nations which have low levels of employment, escape war from their nations, for adventure, education among other reasons. As per the article, the increasing number of immigrants in the US is a disaster which needs to be solved otherwise the situation may turn out to be worse.
The decision on whether to deny or accept the entry of refugees into America has been a controversial issue in today’s current events. Many American citizens have resolved to heated conflicts when expressing their differing opinions on whether the refugee policy should be revised or not. Refugees should be welcomed into America with open arms, but there must be a limit on the number of these refugees seeking asylum that can enter the country in order to save the economy.
After the horrific events of 9/11, the urgency for national security and amounts of anti-terrorist perceptions has increased. In fact, the national security of a country/state is deemed to be more valuable than the safety of people in desperate need of refuge. Moreover, the border is considered to be symbol of “national sovereignty” which, a state much protect at all costs (Crepeau 2007, pg. 312). In other words, since “security” is a top priority of a country, there are not many regards for the rights and interests of immigrants or non-citizens. Furthermore, in regards to anti-terrorism perceptions, they target a certain group of people by associating their entire race with terrorism and danger, creating many negative stereotypes. More importantly, these perceptions have amplified into major concern about immigrants and immigration. Evidently, this concern is responsible for the increase in immigration laws, which criminalize and prevent the mobility of migrants; and the increase in border control/policing services.