Define wisdom.
Wisdom runs parallel with the ideals of Stoicism, which was first taught by Zeno in Athens. The followers of Stoicism believed that the principle of the world was reason, and this concept led them to idealize apathy and indifference to personal costs. People who are wise make sure to steer clear from making choices because of their benefits or harm to himself or others. A wise man considers the logic and ethics of their actions rather than the emotions they would inflict on an individual.
How does a society choose its morals?
All societies have different means of choosing their morals. In the few millennia that humans have taken over the Earth, we have seen a variety of morals. In the ancient civilizations of Egypt and Mesopotamia, deities had a majority of the control of human life. Men were made to serve, feed, and learn from the deities. In Greece, a shift occurred toward humanism, and from then on cultures began to decide what was best for the human body rather than have their superior beings decide for them. That being said, a society will choose its morals based on where they lie on a spectrum. The people may look to the skies for their ethical decisions, or they may look around to their peers to decide what is best for themselves.
…show more content…
Dignity is modeled by people who are worthy of their public respect. In the back of Julius Caesar’s head, he knew what dignity was when he gave to the poor and “turned down the crown”, but the Roman society despised the man when he killed one third of the population and left the people to fend for themselves. From Julius Caesar, we can determine that a dignified man is one who can respectably earn the admiration of his
Socrates, an Athenian philosopher who lived from 469 BC until his very unnecessary death in 399 BC, has had his wisdom called into question many times since he has been studied. But to know whether some is wise, we must first know what it means to be wise. According to Websters Dictionary, to be is wise is : (1) having or showing good judgment; (2) informed; (3) learned; (4) shrewd amd cunning. From this definition, it is clear to me that Socrates was wise in every aspect of the word. He shows this wisdom while
Wisdom can be defined as, “prudence”, or “the capacity to make sensible decisions and judgments based on personal knowledge or experience.” It is due to wisdom that we are able to differentiate between right and wrong, or at least what we consider right and wrong. The great Greek philosopher, Plato,
Our morals are what defined the line between deviant behaviour and non-deviant behaviour. We get our morals from: family, friends, the way we are brought up and where we have lived through out our lives. Everybody might not have the same morals but we all have a clear perception towards what is and isn’t acceptable in the public eye.
What are morals? Morals, I suspect, had it's origins in biology, but like I said before it's more complicated than that. People are smart, and as such, inventive. Some amount of
This, I believe, is what Socrates viewed wisdom as in Plato’s Apology. While it can be inferred that Socrates viewed wisdom as humility, knowledge, and self-knowledge through his examinations of the politicians, poets, and craftsmen, this is not Socrates’ complete view of wisdom. The more comprehensive view Socrates held of wisdom lies in his belief
Based on the difference in the two parts of the soul that shared in reason, Aristotle then distinguished virtues into two kinds. People with well-formed reasoning part of the are believed to have intellectual virtues. They possess “philosophic wisdom and understanding and practical wisdom” (1103a). Philosophic wisdom here refers to the ability for one to reason logically about complicated philosophic problems, while the practical wisdom makes people understand “what sort of thing conduce to good life in general” (1140a).
Stoic’s aphorism seem to get its best expression in Mrs. Thatcher’s philanthropic adage ‘one-of-us-ness’. Animals, the beautiful creatures of God in stoic and later especially in Porphyry’s sense need to be treated as rational. Stoic asks for justice to all rational beings but it seems to me that there is no relevant proclaim from their side which talks in favour of the animal’s justice. They claim about the rationality of animals but do not confer a right like the human that later Porphyry wonderfully introduced in his writing On Abstinence From Animal Food. Aristotle’s successor Theophratus believes that both animals and humans are made of the same tissues and like human, animals too has the same way of perception, reasoning and appetites.
From seeing the two videos that played to me it depend on what era one has lived whether morality is determined by the culture. The reason I state that is because it depends when you were born into this world if the old way is still relevant.
The Stoics viewed philosophy as a tangible thing. To them, it was not abstract, nor was it theoretical. They posited that it was meant to help with the life’s problems. The Stoics developed a practical philosophy to make sense of the world around them. It was deliberately designed to help its devotees succeed and live good lives. Stoicism touts a quite uncomplicated principle: We do not control the world around us; we control only how we respond. And so we may as well respond well–respond virtuously.
Every civilization from the prehistoric era until the end of time had or will have a moral code. There is no fixed set of ethics that is universally accepted. Each group’s ethics may vary their priorities in aspects of the importance of wealth and family based on religion or pure culture. In certain cultures and religions such as Buddhism, following the moral is rewarded with metaphysical prestige. In contrast, I believe that business and academics should be cutthroat and selfish while human welfare is a priority where people should assist others in order to stay alive and well.
These were handed down by God to govern the ways that people behave. But other religions that are not similar to Christianity have ethical codes as well. For example, many religions have elaborate sets of bans that govern their adherents behaviors. Although religion means something different to those of faith, it carries a immeasurable and persuasive movement of moral and ethical standards that guide the way for humans. While there may be such a wide range of belief systems, religion has a complex set of spiritual and cultural rules and rituals. There are several types of religions in the world today, most of which worships and practices differently. Most of the traditions, beliefs, and rituals these religions are consisted of our
Humans are born with an innate ability to have high morality based on the Natural law Theory as opposed to the Divine Command Theory. Our instincts towards morality come from within ourselves. Fundamentally we have seven basic tools that produce our survival and morality so it’s up to us to utilize them to the fullest in a positive manner. Our morality can be supported by outside influence such as our religion but with so many religions and Gods throughout the world, it would be overwhelming to decide which is ultimately making our choices towards good morality. That has to come from within
Aristotle sustains that wisdom consists in knowing the cause which made a material thing to be what it is. For Aristotle, wise people know more than just what something is; they also know why it is what it is, or what causes it to be what it is. People with wisdom, for instance, a master worker understand not only that fire is hot, but also know why it is hot. Those with experience only, who do not know why something works in a certain manner, cannot teach. Say physicians understand that there is a relationship between the medical condition of this class of patients and the ingredients in this particular drug. They are then motivated to learn why the drug works on these
Morals have been established throughout the centuries to bring order throughout society. Although on the surface all morals appear to be universal, each culture has their own way of carrying them out. Each culture has its own ideas and opinions on what practices are considered right and wrong. Many cultures follow the basic morals, but adjust them a little to fit their needs. Moral standards have evolved to become relative to a particular culture, as the different interpretations of universal morals soon become different morals altogether.
My view of human morality is that it is influenced by individual culture and experience. Because I believe that as human beings, we all have our own values, beliefs and attitudes that we develop throughout the course of our lives and contribute to our own sense of reality of ourselves and the society. Regardless of what will influence and mold us throughout our lives, we have the rationality inclined to know between what is right and wrong so that we will do good as we want others to do so. We are exposed to cultural values from many sources: family, peers, education, authorities, and religion. Because we spend most of our formative years with family, the values of the family whether good or bad, are a powerful influence. These are a reflection of an individual character and culture. We are born into a world of values that have existed throughout humanity 's history. We absorb these values as children while we navigate our social environment, processing and reevaluating them throughout our adult lives. Every individual understands that life is important hence he or she needs moral values, which act as guiding principles. Our values form the foundation of our lives. They dictate the choices we make and determine the direction that our life takes. Our values will influence our decisions related to our relationships, career, and other activities we engage in. The world we lived is complicated that there exist no universal morality and absolute freedom and since our morals are