Constitutional Convention 1787 Analysis

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was held to address problems in governing the United States which had been operating under the Articles of Confederation since it’s independence from Britain. Fifty-five delegates from the states attended the convention to address these issues. The delegates consisted of federalists who wanted a strong central government to maintain order and were mainly wealthier merchants and plantation owners and anti-federalists who were farmers, tradesmen and local politicians who feared losing their power and believed more power should be given to the states. The Constitutional Convention dealt with the issue of the debate between federalists and anti-federalists. The debates, arguments and compromises

55 delegates of twelve states wrote the Constitution at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia during the summer of 1787 and in 1788 the states ratified it. That gathering at Philadelphia’s Independence Hall brought nearly all of the nation’s most prominent men together, including Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, James Madison and George Washington. Several of the men appointed had records of service in the army and in the courts and others were experienced in colonial and state government. When Thomas Jefferson found out who had been appointed he wrote “It is really an assembly of demigods” to John Adams. That summer in Philadelphia, the men, drew out a document defining the distinct powers for the the president, the federal courts and the Congress. This division of authority that was established is known as the principle of separation of powers, and it ensures that none of the branches of government can overstep their boundaries.

The Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia was a secret meeting that took place between May and September of 1787. The reason of this meeting was to revise the Articles of Confederation. As well the problem from the Revolutionary War debt. The president of this convention was George Washington. Fifty four individuals attended which most of them were wealthy young persons who wanted to protect the economic of the state. The Constitution that arrived from the convention accepted a government with more limited powers, where each brand would check and balance the authority between the Judicial Executive and Legislative

The Constitutional Convention was held in May 25 1787 in Philadelphia to discuss revising the Article of Confederation. Delegates from the various states met in Philadelphia and George Washington president was elected to preside over Convention. However, the result of convention wasn’t likely what the purpose of convention to revise the Article of Confederation because what it ended up doing could not answer successfully the question of slavery and was creating a new constitution, which was the United States Constitution. There were three plans submitted for government structure which were Virginia, New Jersey, and Connecticut Compromise.

The 1787 Constitutional Convention was paramount in unifying the states after the Revolutionary War. However, in order to do so, the convention had to compromise on many issues instead of addressing them with all due haste. This caused the convention to leave many issues unresolved. Most notably were the issues of slavery, race, secession, and states’ rights. Through the Civil War and the Reconstruction, these issues were resolved, and in the process the powers of the federal government were greatly expanded.

The Constitutional Convention convened in 1787 to discuss to revision of the Articles of Confederation. However, as the debates went on, the delegates soon discovered they needed to write a completely new form of government rather than revise the old one. This convention which created the ensuing Constitution was called because of the various problems with the Articles of Confederation, such as a federal government that was too weak and economic laws that were causing the American economy to decline rather than grow. These characteristics of the Articles built up over the years until the unrest became apparent to the state governments with a rebellion in Massachusetts. The first major problem with the Articles which led to the calling of the convention was the limited power they gave the federal government.

Next I would like to explore the weaknesses and strengths about the New Constitution that the Constitutional Convention adopted in September 1787. Not so long after the Articles of Confederation were enacted, some citizens started to feel that the national government was too weak. As a result of this the Constitutional Convention was called to order in Philadelphia between May and September 1787 to help address the problem of a weak central government. First even though the New Constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation, it also had some weaknesses. One of the main weaknesses of the New Constitution was that it lacked a bill of rights, and the New Constitution still protected slavery. Even with theses weaknesses, the strengths of the New Constitution far out weigh the negatives. One of the greatest strengths of the New Constitution was a central

The 1787 Philadelphia Constitutional Convention involved an extensive amount of compromise among the delegates in order to finalize the U.S. Constitution into the structure that it is known for today. On one end of the spectrum were states' righters, or Antifederalists, who were often delegates from smaller states such as Connecticut, and who sought to scale back the power of the federal government. On the other end of the spectrum were the Federalists, who wanted a strong national government to unite the nation. Additionally, there were other delegates who could not be put into such clear-cut categories. What followed at the convention was the process of compromise: a group of men with different ideas about how government should be structured,

The Convention of 1787 which took place in Philadelphia, was of great significance because its major focus was to address problems with the governing of the United States of America which had formerly been operated by the Articles of Confederation. In this convention, congress called on each state to send delegates from each state so they could revise the articles. Delegates came to the conclusion that fixing the articles would be pointless and instead decided to write a new set of ground rules for an effective government. The Philadelphia Convention set out to correct weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and their five major objectives are as follows, “resolve disputes over representation in the new government, encourage public input while limiting excessive democracy, protect commerce and property, create legitimacy for the new system, and to provide a coordinated approach to international relations as well as national defense.” Out of that convention the 55 delegates decided upon a new framework for the government which was the Constitution.

In May of 1787, the Constitutional Convention was held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. There, 55 delegates met to discuss a new constitution because their current one, the Articles of Confederation, was not working. They needed a newer, stronger central government that they felt was necessary to keep the nation together. However, they feared tyranny due to their past with the King and all of the harsh treatment he brought upon the Americans before. Such as the Intolerable Acts and how the king took away all of their rights.

The Philadelphia Convention was an important meeting when Congress invited each state to send delegates. Between May and September 1787, 55 delegates from 12 states convened in Philadelphia for the Constitutional Convention. Rhode Island was the only state that refused to send representatives to the Convention, because they did not want to revise or replace the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation had proven insufficient to cope with the challenges facing the young nation. The Convention discussed the debate over the size and structure of the federal government, and its result was the U.S Constitution. Though the Articles of Confederation had provided the framework for governance since the declaration of the American Revolution against Britain, many of the fledgling nation’s political leaders agreed that the creation of a stronger central government was essential to the development of the power and potential of the United States.

The Constitutional Convention took place in Philadelphia. It was also called the Federal Convention, the Grand Convention at Philadelphia and the Philadelphia Convention. They were going to revise the Articles of Confederation but instead Alexander Hamilton and James Madison decided to create a new government. While creating their new government, they had many arguments.

Before the Convention of 1787. George Washington and the other delegates from Virginia had abstract a plan called the Virginia Plan. This plan laid out a “completely new instrument of government” which is embedded in our government today. The plan provided for three separate branches of government: legislative, executive, and judicial. The legislative branch would have two houses, with the first house to be elected by the people of each state, and the second by the first house from a list created by the state legislatures. The idea was that no one branch becomes too powerful. Each branch “checks” the power of the other branches to make sure that the power is balanced between them and the fear of a monarchy. was a “Farmer, Slaveholder, General

Danny Chasteen and Susan Rick thought that they had finally gotten their big break when they won $250,000 from the Illinois lottery. But, because the Illinois budget had not passed, they received nothing but a cold promise. No, the lottery situation is not the most pressing problem facing our government, it is merely a trivial outgrowth of a bigger problem: political gridlock in the state legislature. A large majority of the citizens of Illinois are exasperated with the government, and they have the right to be, but a Constitutional Convention is not going to fix any of our problems. Every state has its own dilemmas, and these issues can be solved through the everyday political process. A Constitutional Convention is simply not necessary, when the Constitution itself is not what is holding back the Illinois State government.

Before the creation of the new constitution in 1787, the Articles of Confederation served the new nation. This document was not as comprehensive as the constitution as it was made hurriedly and did not resolve most of the early issues of the republic. Compared to the new constitution the Articles of Confederation gave congress a lot of power which left the national government weak on matters such as tax regulation, foreign policy, and the armed forces. The weakness of the government was seen to threaten the stability of the new nation, this situation together with some issues led to the Constitutional Convention. The Articles of Confederation was considered weak in some ways when compared to the constitution. These weaknesses include (Yazawa, 2016):