China vs. Rome Compare and Contrast

Han China and Rome are actually very similar in their geographical conquests. First of all, both civilizations were the largest and most expansive in their areas. Rome stretched from Spain, England, and France to Mesopotamia and North Africa. The Han dynasty expanded to Korea, china, and central Asia. These huge areas allowed a feeling of power and more economic stability, but also had a few downfall's. Even though the Roman Empire had close to 60 million people in the lands, the population began to dwindle by the end of its empire, they could no longer supply enough people to protect its borders, so they had to turn to outside sources for its military. These outside sources had distrusting loyalties, so, Rome’s borders were not so well protected and eventually fell to complete invasion. Han Dynasty fell to its fate. Both the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire's weakened so much that they both crippled under the weight of outside invasions. A huge difference between the two civilizations, however, was their level of isolation. Being in China, the Han Dynasty was on the east side and was much more isolated than Rome, which was a peninsula and quite open to everywhere. Though

Though they were both able to trade due to their expansions and coasts, Rome did much more trade than Han China. Also, due to this vastness, both societies’ cultures were spread all over the world (which led to other civilizations forming) and their economies were boosted (which led to better conditions for the people).

With a strong centralized government, both civilizations greatly honored their leaders but the Chinese perceived them differently from the Romans, which is one of the major factors that sets these two civilizations apart. The Chinese

Empires on their outside may seem very different and unique. However, when you get down to their fundamentals, you begin to truly realize how similar they are. Just as the imposing pine tree and humble tomato plant may seem vastly different, their start from a lowly seed and craving for water and sunlight to survive unifies them. Such is also true with the Han and Roman empires. While key differences may be present, their social structures, influencing religions, and causes of collapse unify them.

As you can see the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire possessed many differences both politically and through their accomplishments. That being said, they also shared an extensive variety of similarities. They varied in government, but

3. Evidence – (China) These people were elite members of society. To become involved in politics or to be any leader, a person had to take a test of intelligence, based off Confucian teachings and beliefs. (India) In society, Brahmins (priests) were held in the highest regard. Whatever caste a person was born into, that is where the person stayed, and that’s what determined the person’s importance.

The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire both had a great influence not only on its people but the world as a whole. The two had similar and different methods of political control. Both ruled their people under a bureaucracy, they had civil servants to maintain their large empires, and their foundations were made of great and strong rulers. Aside from the similarities they also had several differences. Take China for example, they focused more on Confucianism and they had a Mandate of Heaven. Rome on the other hand used entertainment to distract and control the masses of its population.

Both Rome and Han China equivalently constructed similar roads, bridges, and water development systems all to strengthen their economy. Verifications of this can be seen when Rome fully realized the potential of arches and bridges in their road systems that spanned more than 400,000 km of roads that were used for trade. Correspondingly, they also built aqueducts as a form of water engineering to constantly bring in a flow of water to the cities and towns. Similarly, Han China built massive fortified roadways for trade and walls for fortification comparable to the Great Wall of China as a means of defense. Also in comparison to Roman aqueducts, Han China built water canals as means to direct water as they pleased. These similarities defined their engineering skills as these inventions and constructions were used to help strengthen their economies. Rome built and constructed roads to aid their trade systems and make easier routes of travel. Furthermore, they used aqueducts to get water into the city saving money and the need for human labor. Similarly, Han China used their fortified roads to trade much easier and as a means of safer travel. This went hand in hand with China’s water canals that also aided their economy by directing water where needed saving much money and limiting the need for human labor as well.

In both civilizations, epidemics broke out within the population. Public baths, sewage systems, and human-animal contact caused diseases such as malaria, smallpox, measles, and the bubonic plague to wipe out entire populations. In addition, both suffered a cultural decay intellectually. Roman scholars wrote textbooks summarizing already discovered information instead of developing new ideas. During that time, Romans became increasingly focused on pleasure seeking, turning away from political and economic ideas that once shaped their civilization. Confucian scholars in Han China became less creative and centered also, causing social and political decline in Confucian philosophies. However; when

Numerous land-based empires and regional states had existed before 3rd century BC. However, none of these empires could be compared to the Han Dynasty in China and the Imperial Rome. The cultural identity built during the Han Dynasty such as the family-organized ancestor worship and culture centered on the Classic Confucian teachings had been influential for the development of China for several centuries . On the other hand, the Roman Empire had shown their authority over the Mediterranean Region and introduced the concept of “citizen” which influenced the development of states even after its fall . In general, both of these empires became powerful and influential forces during their times.

In 600 BCE-600 CE, the early domestication of animals, war, patriarchy, and privately owned property were all contributing factors to the establishment and growth of slavery in civilizations. Imperial Rome and and Han China were socially similar in that they both had inequalities amongst the different classes. In contrast, slavery in Imperial Rome was the basis for society, while in Han China slavery was neither widespread nor was it a major source of labor. Imperial Rome and Han China were socially similar because vast social inequalities led to rebellion. In 73 BCE Rome, a revolt for freedom broke out among gladiators that was named for its leader, Spartacus.

Both the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire had a significant influence on the future of their empires. The Han Dynasty began in 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E. and set the pattern for most of Chinese history. The Roman Empire began in 27 B.C.E. to 476 C.E., lasting almost 500 years. The Han Dynasty has many similarities with the Roman Empire such as their significance of imperial armies and hierarchical structure, but they have differences too such as religion and philosophy ("Roman Empire v. Han Dynasty").

China and Rome are both complex, independent empires with unique characteristics. Although each empire is independent, there are variables that allow them to be similar to one another within their strengths and weaknesses. The Chinese empires were established in around 221 B.C.E., and the Roman Republic was first administered in around 500 B.C.E. Both the Roman and Chinese empires underwent a series of various transitions to obtain their current status in terms of government systems, legal ideas, and in-depth philosophies and teachings.

Roman and Chinese empires in the classical era of civilizations share many similarities and differences in their rise, influence of rulers, control of gained power, and fall. With larger populations and the call for unity, these empires took expansion seriously. Also, they centralized their cities by stabilizing and standardizing for their growing populations. Rulers played important roles in both empires, even though the way rulers consolidated power differed. Through the construction of walls and continual expansion, the Romans and Chinese were able to gain control of their large and diverse populations. Unfortunately, too strong of military forces and rapid expansion, among other factors, negatively impacted the empires and led to their fall.

How was the ancient civilization of China developed. In this essay I will be discussing what physical features, inventions, trade helped the development of Ancient China. I will also be discussing how they ran their government, what food they farmed, and what their society was like.