Resource Based View is still a hot topic although the theory is more than 20 years old. The Resource-based view's foremost proposition is that an organisation's capacity for competitive advantage is limited to the management of its own bundle of resources (Wernerfelt, 1984;Rumelt, 1984).
Generally, RBV focuses on the internal environment of an organisation and looks for the values that are derived from resources, capabilities and competencies.
Firstly, 'value' describes a resource's ability to enable a firm to employ a value-creating strategy, by either outperforming its competitors or reducing its own shortcomings (Barney 1991, Amit &Schoemaker, 1993). Secondly, 'rarity' presumes that for a resource to be of value, it must be rare or unique in terms of availability as a resource to other
…show more content…
Moreover, it is imperative to believe that functional areas such as marketing have a significant relationship with the resource-based view and directs corporate strategies towards a more marketing-centric approach.
In the early days, it was believed that marketing was tactical and not strategic. In the 1980’s marketing strategy had contributed little to the strategy and majorly contributed in formulating general marketing concepts, therefore, the core aim of marketing strategy was based on micro marketing management concerns. Marketing management research focused on developing 4P’s for certain products and product lines under micro marketing and there was very less contribution to the general effectiveness of organisations. (Day &Wensley, 1983; Wind & Robertson, 1983).
The marketing management research in 1960’s and 1970’s comprised of four broad research points:
1. Need to include competitor position or direction.
2. View the firm on the whole not just a single
If a firm’s resources are both valuable and rare, a firm may achieve a competitive advantage (Newbert, 2008). A resource is considered valuable when it improves the efficiency and effectiveness of a strategy, and when it exploits external opportunities or neutralises external threats (Barney, 1991). This wording is somewhat confusing as it draws a direct connection with the environmental model, i.e. Porter’s (1985) five forces. The ‘value’ variable could therefore be rendered exogenous to the RBV (Priem and Butler, 2001). On the other hand, Peteraf (1993) praises the model for its internal focus and ability to uncover potential sources of competitive advantage which cannot be attributed to the external environment, notably because areas of value are often so difficult to identify (Newbert, 2008). The term ‘potential’ is used because not all resources have the ability to create a SCA
Acquisition and organisation of resources can be critical success factor in an organization. While on the other hand, change requires a firm to gain expand and utilise resource such as human, financial, knowledge as a crucial asset. Resource based approach supports this view and as Tywoniak (2007) claimed by that resource based view is the most dominant theory in history of management. This is achieved by targeting state of sustained competitive advantage by controlling resources and capabilities. This view emphasis on the need for a ‘fit’ among capabilities and external market, and since each firm has unique capabilities and resources, this result in achieving strategic
the internal analysis of the firm and the external analysis of the industry and competitive environment
One of the most important functional areas of a business is marketing. Marketing provides the organization with information,
The resource-based view was developed to help emphasize internal capabilities as a means of creating competitive advantage (Henry, n.d.) In this view, the organization is comprised of a series of resources that are used by management. These resources are the source of new products and the internal improvements that help companies to better compete in the marketplace. There are two different types of resources tangible and intangible. The former category consists of physical assets, and is characterized as physical resources, human resources and capital resources. So physical resources are the buildings, machinery, materials and productive capacity. At Coca-Cola, the company's physical resources
Selecting a business strategy that details valuable resources and distinctive competencies, strategizing all resources and capabilities and ensuring they are all employed and exploited, and building and regenerating valuable resources and distinctive competencies is key. The analysis of resources, capabilities and core competencies describes the external environment which is subject to change quickly. Based off this information a firm has to be prepared and know its internal resources and capabilities and offer a more secure strategy. Furthermore, resources and capabilities are the primary source of profitability. Resources entail intangible, tangible, and human resources.
Barney, J. (2004). Firm resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Strategy: Process Content Context: an international perspective, de Wit & Meyer , 285-292.
He suggested that sustained competitive advantage derives from the resources and capabilities a firm controls that are valuable, rare, imperfectly imitable, and not substitutable. He further added that the resources and capabilities can be viewed in form of tangible and intangible assets. There are four different categories of resources financial, physical, human, and organization.
| Valuable resources which are also rare convey a competitive advantage, but its relative permanence is not assured. The
For a business to be successful and have a competitive advantage, it is important to evaluate the company’s resources and capabilities (Pitt & Koufopoulos, 2012). Resources in a company are the productive assets owned (tangible or intangible) whereas capabilities are what the company can do with this (Grant, 2010). “Establishing competitive
Competitive strategy, after Porter, came to be defined as the strategy of a business unit which seeks to achieve sustainable Competitive Advantage (SCA). The literature on strategy deems the market-based view (MBV) and the resource –based view (RBV) as two approaches to giving businesses the competitive edge they need to compete in their industries. Aside from having competitive advantage as their ultimate goal, the two approaches are also similar in the sense that they both make use of particular tools and models in their undertakings. They also differ in numerous ways,
This strategy emphasizes the use of an organization’s resources and capabilities to achieve a core competence that cannot be imitated by competitors. Furthermore, the resource based school argues that if an organization distinctively improves its internal capability; that is being able to have effective inside machinery to deliver products and services to customers, the organization will enjoy a massive advantage in the market. This school also argues that in order to have a competitive advantage, an organization must have resource and capabilities that are sophisticated to those of competitors (QuickMBA,
The resource-based view(RBV), based on the internal environment of a company, explains the performance differences among firms in an assumption of that having a high performance (Wernerfelt,1984) are made up of bundles of resources that give them advantages in the maketing(Barney and Arikan, 2001). It figures out the resources are valuable, rare, costly-imitated and have an organizational orientation, also known as VRIO framework(Barney, 2002). The resources, refer to the
These two streams of research - market orientation and the RBV of the firm - form
For transforming a short-run competitive advantage into a sustained competitive advantage we require resources that are heterogeneous in nature and not perfectly mobile. This translates into valuable resources that are neither perfectly imitable nor substitutable without great effort. If these conditions are fulfilled then the bundle of resources can sustain the firm's above average returns.