SW724_M9_PeerAssessment_Rubric_w (1)

.docx

School

Liberty University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

101

Subject

Communications

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

8

Uploaded by PresidentLightning13006 on coursehero.com

Peer Review Rubric Peer Assessment Form: Mock Diagnostic Interview INTERVIEWER_FELICITY WATSON FOR ALYSSA THACKE_______________________________ CRITERIA RATINGS COMMENTS 1. Did the interviewer introduce herself/himself? X Yes X No What strengths or opportunities for improvement did you observe from the interviewer’s introduction? The interviewer said hello but did not say their name. The interviewer was very welcoming, upbeat, and encouraging. They explained the process of the first session, which can help with nerves. The interviewer also shared if Nina is uncomfortable that we can stop and to be open and honest with her. Opportunities for growth: It might be helpful to share your name just as a reminder for the client. 2. Did the interviewer address issues of confidentiality with the client? X Yes No Describe the content covered in the discussion of confidentiality. Would you have added or omitted anything- why or why not? She clearly said that the only people that would have things shared with them is people on the treatment
Peer Review Rubric CRITERIA RATINGS COMMENTS team. Opportunities for growth: I think clarifying who is on the treatment team would be helpful to remind the client. 3. How thorough was the interviewer’s assessment of the presenting problem? Very comprehensive X Somewhat comprehensive Somewhat deficient Explain to the interviewer what made your assessment of this criteria to be comprehensive or deficient (e.g. what was clearly present or absent.) Client explained what the past had looked like with this situation how long it had gone on etc. Opportunities for growth. After the client shared lots of information, the interviewer then asked how long it had been going on. I think client gave lots of information but repeating back to the client some of what they said can help with active listening and taking notes. I recognize it was a lot, but sometimes if not, it feels to the client like we aren’t listening. If we repeat some information back and say you are just clarifying then it can reassure the client they are listening and just checking for accuracy.
Peer Review Rubric CRITERIA RATINGS COMMENTS 4. How thorough was the interviewer’s assessment of the history of present illness/problem? X Very comprehensive Somewhat comprehensive Somewhat deficient Explain to the interviewer what made your assessment of this criteria to be comprehensive or deficient (e.g. what was clearly present or absent.) There was a lot of empathy expressed by the interviewer and thanks to the client for sharing. When the client shared, the interviewer appeared to be nodding and smiling or having a serious facial expression. 5. How thorough was the interviewer’s assessment of past psychiatric history? X Very comprehensive Somewhat comprehensive Somewhat deficient Explain to the interviewer what made your assessment of this criteria to be comprehensive or deficient (e.g. what was clearly present or absent.) Client shared that they were then placed due to how bad her mental health got and that they were put on medication. Clarified if this is the first time in the therapy. The same psychiatrist in the facility as now on the team. Interviewer repeated back that client had been in inpatient. 6. How thorough was the interviewer’s assessment of safety? Very comprehensive X Somewhat comprehensive Somewhat deficient Explain to the interviewer what made your assessment of this criteria to be comprehensive or deficient (e.g. what was clearly
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help